Forum menu
7 billion people - ...
 

[Closed] 7 billion people - Family cap?

Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3286570]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-15368276

So with the population ever increasing and as Britain is already one of the most densely populated countries in Europe, should we introduce a family cap of say 2 kids or would this be very unfair?

What number are you - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-15391515
I'm number 4,750,264,407 strange that's always been my lucky number!


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:40 am
Posts: 11386
Free Member
 

Been thinking this for some time, 1 or 2 at the most,


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Like they did in China? That worked well, with no undesirable consequences.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:45 am
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

The reporter said that all 7 billion people would be able to live in a dense city like london or new york but would have to be the size of France. So I vote all countries send there unwanted residents to France. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it's our god-given [s]right[/s] duty to have as many children as possible.

breed faster!


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:45 am
Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 

it's our god-given right duty to have as many children as possible.

I don't have any children, but I do feel responsible if I ever choose to that I shouldn't have loads! Who wants to live in a pokey house or flat with no green space?


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm number 4,750,264,407

Are you several hundred years old?


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:52 am
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

Who wants to live in a pokey house or flat with no green space?

not me, but plenty do.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We're all going to die of flu/super volcano/asteroid anyway. It's overdue (apparently)


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:53 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i] Little of the current growth is happening in developed countries like yours.[/i]
and
[i]The average family size globally has declined by half since 1950 - from five children in to the current 2.5.[/i]

suggests a family cap in the UK would make no difference, to me. I could be wrong.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 10:54 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I think Dez is right, our own population growth has almost peaked hasn't it? Most Western countries are projected to decrease population in the next hundred years aren't they? That's what the bloke on telly was saying last night. The growth is all happening in developing countries like Ethiopia and Wales.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:00 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

A worldwide family cap does make a lot of sense, on purely logical grounds, but sadly it would be completely impossible to enforce.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:03 am
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

The growth is all happening in developing countries like Ethiopia and Wales.

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:04 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]but sadly it would be completely impossible to enforce. [/i]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes cap the population! I can say that as i already have two kids......

Who wants to live in a pokey house or flat with no green space?

Me! Im in a 1 bed council flat on the first floor. But i do have my local woods just up the road. And im only 10 minutes away from the countryside.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:07 am
Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Apparently not Samuri, below is a wiki copy and paste (wiki is the master top trump in all arguments)

The UK is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe, with a population of approximately 62 million people, and a density of 246 people per square kilometer (992/sq mi).[57] With 50,431,700 inhabitants, or 84% of the UK's total,[58] England is the most populous nation in the United Kingdom. In 2006, an estimated 491,000 migrants[59] arrived to live in the UK for at least a year, while 400,000 people emigrated from the UK for a year or more. [60] Most new arrivals were heading for London and the South East.[61]

The latest population projections for the country indicate that in 2031, the population of Britain would be 71 million, in 2050 it would reach 90 million and by 2081 the population could be 110 million.[62]
The first Census in 1801 revealed that the population of England, Scotland and Wales was 10 million.[63]


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:07 am
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

children are not the problem, old people are.
they must be culled.
I'll light the pyre.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:08 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Yes cap the population! I can say that as i already have two kids......

Two is okay. That's really just replacing you and your partner.

Hence the [url= http://populationmatters.org/stopattwo.html ]OPT "Stop At Two" pledge.[/url]


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:09 am
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

World Bank figures suggest UK pop growth is already very low- these figures include immigration.

[url= http://www.google.co.uk/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=sp_pop_grow&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country&idim=country:NZL:GBR:USA:AUS:CHN&ifdim=country&tstart=-289702800000&tend=1288134000000&hl=en&dl=en&icfg&iconSize=0.5&uniSize=0.035 ]Population growth rate[/url]

edit: how do you embed these?


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Great we could sterilize all the NEDS on council estates and lower the crime rate at the same time.Downside is all the JJBs AND Sports Directs would close as the footfall would decrease


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Two is okay. That's really just replacing you and your partner.

Phew- i feel vindicated now ๐Ÿ˜›

Great we could sterilize all the NEDS on council estates and lower the crime rate at the same time.Downside is all the JJBs AND Sports Directs would close as the footfall would decrease

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:20 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

Just don't talk about immigration OK?


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:21 am
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

Two is okay. That's really just replacing you and your partner

You've got to go for fewer than 2 to get zero population growth in the short to medium term - as brakes alludes to above, old people are not dying as early as they used to.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:25 am
Posts: 29
Free Member
 

Sadly samuri, that would not do the job. Its an SMK XS78, out of the box they tend to be a bit low on power. Fine for rats and short range, but to be honest you'd struggle to do more than make people very angry if you fired that at them.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:32 am
Posts: 1196
Free Member
 

I have 8 kids don't see the problem myself,


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:37 am
Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just don't talk about immigration OK?

According to that BBC thing there are 23 extra immigrants an hour and 19 new births. I guess it depends on what use they are to our society? We don't need any more hand car washers but we do need more care home workers.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:43 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

ccording to that BBC thing there are 23 extra immigrants an hour and 19 new births.

What country are you in?? For the UK it said:

Every hour, there are: 85 Births, 66 Deaths, + 23 Immigrants


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:48 am
Posts: 18202
Full Member
 

Populations have a funny way of self-levelling if they become unsustainable.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:49 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

I daresay that as the population increases more people will look elsewhere to live - more likely the wealthier perhaps who seeing the green belt shrink decide to live in places less desirable to the less well off. Like France.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:51 am
Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What country are you in?? For the UK it said:

Apologies I subtracted the deaths from the births.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:52 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Populations have a funny way of self-levelling if they become unsustainable.

Or expanding till they consume every resource available then very quickly dying out.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 11:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Or expanding till they consume every resource available then very quickly dying out.

Plenty of hydrogen up there. We just need forward thinking engineers to put it to use for massive amounts of power, then use that power to synthesise hydrogen into as many other elements as we want! So, breed more and make more engineers! Fully synthetic future, here we come*.

Just a shame this'll help out the rest of the population too... ๐Ÿ˜€

(*bye bye Happiness and moral rigidity)


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:30 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

How about relaxing the health and safety obsession and letting a few of the more stupid ones cull themselves?


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

uggests a family cap in the UK would make no difference, to me. I could be wrong.

Got to agree - the UK fertility rate is supposedly about 1.95 children per female, which is pretty much flat/downward population.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgdO92JOXxAOdFZIUU1SODRaMXI5cFdvMkRIQm5Obmc#gid=0

all UK population growth seems to be from immigration, and children born to foreign mothers <cue Daily Mail style suggestions>


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:32 pm
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

brakes is right, it's old the old folk clogging up the roads, the pavements and the hospitals.

What we need is an age cap. I propose 90 years is plenty for everyone.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:35 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

We should be thinking about resources here, the homeless and skinny should be allowed to take food off of fat people. ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:37 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

What we need is an age cap. I propose 90 years is plenty for everyone.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:38 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

A good start would be just stopping religious groups preventing the distribution of and education about contraception in developing countries.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We should be thinking about resources here

Soylent Green?


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:46 pm
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

GrahamS: exactly!!!


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Maybe the unreformed church of Rome could make a contribution. That bit about us accepting a situation where millions of the poor grow up in the Third World with hardly enough to eat....its a sin that we allow that, but not as evil as CONDOMS!!!!!


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 12:50 pm
Posts: 5976
Free Member
 

I guess it depends on what use they are to our society? We don't need any more hand car washers but we do need more care home workers.

Quite a few immigrants work with me, in fairly low paid positions. They mostly have degrees from a better education system than ours and a decent work ethic/little sense of entitlement. Anyone able to make a go of it in another culture has something good about them IMO. These people are clearly going to improve the gene pool. So I bred with one. Just doing my bit ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 1:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

some cultures still get big amounts of money in return for the honour of marrying their daughters, pump out the kids and its an investment in the future.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 1:21 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I too work with immigrants although they are not poorly paid! where is this better education system than UK universities??? We have a large amount of immigration for our universities alone as they are the best!


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 1:47 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

We have a large amount of immigration for our universities alone as they are the best!

Not sure about that, universities across Europe are of a pretty similar standard, but I would say that degrees gained in developing countries can be very hit and miss as a guide to the actual education received.


 
Posted : 27/10/2011 2:00 pm
Page 1 / 2