Forum menu
womens bikes
 

[Closed] womens bikes

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

after reading a march edition of a certain mtb mag...there was an article about trying to get a full suss priced under £1,000. and if you shop around in the sales etc, yep there are a just few out there...(but only for the male populatin of this world ! hahaha anyway depending on the spec of bike,, of course cos, everybody has there own individual needs on bike spec. .
BUT .. why the heck is it that womens spec bikes are always alot dearer ?


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:28 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I guess it is to do with supply and demand....sadly 🙁


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They can be cheaper

My womens stumpjumper was 200 pounds cheaper than the (identical apart from red instead of pink) mens version and it was under 1000 pounds 🙂


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What p's me off is that they're mostly so under-spec'd compared to the mens bikes.


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:34 pm
Posts: 46062
Free Member
 

I agree mrsf - womens bikes often same price, less spec.

I guess the price/spec difference is supply/demand/cost of 'different' bits on a minor percentage of a range...


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's the same with a lot of clothes. I see something I really like the look of and then find they don't do a women's version, they stop half way up the range iyswim. Cos obviously we don't go out in the rain or owt. Mind you, things are better now than when I started!


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:41 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Yes, agree with mrsf. One really needs to do one's homework.


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What's the difference between female specific bikes and general "male" bikes anyway? 1cm off the top tube?


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Did some research into Scott bikes and only difference on road bikes were shorter brake levers! Geometry was identical. Oh and a silly pink saddle!


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:50 pm
 taka
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its just sexist bike companies and shops


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Depends on the bike soda. Tweaked angles, shorter top tube, more hideous colours. Patronising sparkly paintjobs. that kind of thing.


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:52 pm
Posts: 46062
Free Member
 

my sis in law likes the sparky red paint job on her contessa - shame about the silly flowers.... 👿


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Angles? Surely that would make it a different bike? Shorter top tube, yeah, well that makes sense (in theory). The skanky patronising pink paintjob nonsense...well, that is just depressing in so many ways. My lady still prefers her small 03 spesh enduro to her current 05 "lady" stumpy, and it's not just the paintjob.


 
Posted : 22/02/2009 11:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I do acutally own a women's bike, I have to say. But SC seem to treat it slightly differently to other brands - they change the frame geometry, but then the colours and build kit you choose are exactly the same as the ones on offer to the men.

my sis in law likes the sparky red paint job
What annoys me is you can have colours that appeal to women without making them patronising. My Juliana is a lovely bright red - beautiful. The Voodoo is a really gorgeous bright bluebell blue. Both well suited to a girls bike (although the voodoo isn't one) but no pastels in sight.


 
Posted : 23/02/2009 12:08 am