Forum menu
Why do people wear ...
 

[Closed] Why do people wear baggy shorts?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3129522]

I never saw the attraction as you still have to wear lycra shorts or liner underneath anyway. I don't normally wear two pairs of trousers so why should I wear two pairs of shorts on the bike? I tried them once but they were just awkward, flapped about and snagged the saddle.
Is it just a case of 'everyone else wears them'?


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:15 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

do you wear a pair of pants and then some trousers?

that's lycra+baggies.

if I wanted to just wear me pants I'd get speedos and spectate at the TdF.

[Edit] lycra and knee pads just looks wrong too.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:17 am
Posts: 9038
Free Member
 

Its because I don't want to look like a sex offender whilst in public.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I feel a bit exposed when riding in just lycra, reckon the baggies give me a some padding if I fall off, plus it looks better imo


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You think that's weird you should see wakeboarders. Boardshorts over a wetsuit. Bizarre!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:18 am
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

daveyboywonder +1


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:20 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

The public think you look weird regardless, baggies make no difference! If it makes one feel better then so be it. Personally, I'm not fat ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:20 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Also, I can ride slowly in baggies and feel alright.

Wearign lycra always made me think I had to be riding fast all the time. Bimbling and lycra don't go well together.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh and for the record I agree with the OP. Lycra on it own does the job perfectly well.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:21 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

as you still have to wear lycra shorts or liner underneath anyway
says who? no you don't.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you're fat and/or uncomfortable in your own skin then they make sense.

I just wear lycra shorts, comfier and I get to look like a sex offender!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:22 am
Posts: 57367
Full Member
 

Why do people wear baggy shorts?

So I don't look like an utter ****!

Anyone who leaves the house only in lycra needs a crash course in self-awareness! What do you think you look like? A finely tuned athlete?

Wrong! You look like a burst cushion! Buy a mirror and get a grip!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:23 am
Posts: 1545
Full Member
 

Don't want to put the regulars down my pub off their food when I stop in for my post ride pint.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:23 am
 gamo
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Weird idea but maybe they like them!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:23 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I just wear lycra shorts, comfier and [s]I get to look like[/s] people realise that I am a sex offender!

๐Ÿ™‚

says who? no you don't.

You don't [i]have[/i] to, but if you want any sort of decent padding then you kinda do...


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:24 am
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Right

[img] [/img]

Wrong

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you still have to wear lycra shorts or liner underneath anyway.

Why?
Can't I just wear a normal pair of shorts, that aren't made of lycra? Or is there some law against it?


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:25 am
Posts: 1109
Free Member
 

Lycra and baggies for me. Always has been (on the MTB anyway).

Used to be lycra only in my road days years ago, but I'll go with L&B when I pick it back up one day too.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:25 am
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

1, to protect lycra shorts from crash damage, and brambles.
2, pockets are handy for rides including beer stops
3, not to look like a sex offender
4, I seem to have grown accustomed to riding more relaxed wearing baggies, I wear lycra for training rides and races.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:26 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Anyone who leaves the house only in lycra needs a crash course in self-awareness! What do you think you look like? A finely tuned athlete?

Wrong! You look like a burst cushion! Buy a mirror and get a grip!

Whilst the public think you look like you've just stepped off the catwalk in your flapping baggy shorts, massive rucksack, bulbous helmet and daft sunglasses. You get a grip FFS!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:26 am
Posts: 13490
Full Member
 

I've gone back to just lycra for 90% of my mtbing (which is pretty placid) and reserve the baggies to be worn when there is a real chance of falling off or pushing through lots of brambles. When road riding I have always worn an undervest of some type as the rub of one layer of fabric over another saves some road rash in a spill - I figure it works the same with baggies over lycra.

Agreed though - anything xc-a-like is better done sans baggies as long as you are not too sensitive about what the image obsessed think of you. Baggies seem to be an british thing - the europeans and even the kiwis and yanks don't seem to feel the need when riding xc like rides.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:26 am
Posts: 8871
Full Member
 

Baggy shorts came in as mountain biking became more mainstream with the resultant influx of, shall we say, 'stout' riders. When I started out all cyclists wore lycra, all this were fields, etc, etc.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:27 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

[img] [/img] /p>

She still looks like she's wearing incontinence pads though.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I just wear lycra shorts, comfier and [s]I get to look like[/s] people realise that I am a sex offender!

Its made worse by the fact I have to stuff a couple of pairs of socks down the front of my shorts aswell.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bare Lycra should never be worn by men. It's horrible. Maybe we all look daft, baggy shorts allow us to look far less so.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:28 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

anything xc-a-like is better done sans baggies

You mean what 99% of people ride?

Its made worse by the fact I have to stuff a couple of pairs of socks down the front of my shorts aswell.

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:28 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whilst the public think you look like you've just stepped off the catwalk in your flapping baggy shorts, massive rucksack, bulbous helmet and daft sunglasses. You get a grip FFS!

Oi! naqrrowminded dude, there's not just 2 options you know?
I don't wear any of the shit you listed.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:28 am
Posts: 24439
Full Member
 

I cant keep my sarnies in lycra shorts


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What do you think you look like? A finely tuned athlete?

I know I look quite the opposite but cycling round in baggy shorts that flap around just seems rather stupid when on a bike.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:29 am
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Very very right.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lycra for winners, baggies for losers.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:29 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cheer up luv ^^

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GW - Member

cheer up luv ^^

She probably realised that photo would be slobbered over whilst fat IT Managers in baggies spaffed themselves dry.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whilst on a skills course a few months ago with about 8 others I asked "why do people wear baggy shorts instead of just lycra shorts nowadays, when they can tend to get caught on the nose of your saddle, etc" to be told by the couurse leader that it was because "Lycra shorts are gay". I hope he meant in the "lame" sense of the word! Personally, I always thought that decent lycra shorts did a good enough job on their own. I guess that baggy shorts are de riguer because everyone else wears them - the old circle of fashion phenomenon


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:33 am
Posts: 57367
Full Member
 

Whilst the public think you look like you've just stepped off the catwalk in your flapping baggy shorts, massive rucksack, bulbous helmet and daft sunglasses. You get a grip FFS!

Erm... I look like a * all the time, but at least I realise it. Its called self-awareness. Getting dressed tends to be an exercise in damage limitation, so why the * would i wear clothing that made out of the same material sported by gymnasts and 80's heavy metal bands? Oh... and sex offenders

Anyone who thinks they look buff/cool/athletic in lycra needs to up their medication a bit. The words 'badly stuffed sausage spring to mind


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@ uplink and the Poles... If you've got it, flaunt it.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i choose depending on the bike:

road bike - lycra
hardtail - lycra or baggies (normally depending on whether a pub is involved)
full suss - baggies

could also be seen as decided based on what i'm carrying:
road bike - bottles on frame, stuff in jersey pockets
hardtail - bottles and jersey pockets (for a whippet ride) or a camelback for day rides, or when i'll need a jacket (night ride to pub)
full suss - camelback (no bottle cages on full suss).

camelback and lycra feels wrong.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:35 am
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Baggies for me, unless it's very, very hot and I'm riding in a sparsely populated area.

Although I'm not out of shape by any means, I'd rather spare the general public the sight of me in lycra unless it's absolutely necessary.

[ninja edit] although baggies and an MX top make for harder going on a windy day.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:36 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Anyone who thinks they look buff/cool/athletic in [s]lycra[/s] cycling kit needs to up their medication a bit. The words 'badly stuffed sausage spring to mind

FTFY.

I know exactly how I look, but I'll continue to wear the most appropriate kit for what I'm doing!

Cycling isn't a 'cool' sport - there's even an article on the BBC today about it.

As I said before though, I'm not fat. Perhaps if I was I'd feel more embarassed and wear baggies.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:38 am
Posts: 4116
Full Member
 

For the pockets.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:38 am
Posts: 13490
Full Member
 

Anyone who thinks they look buff/cool/athletic in lycra needs to up their medication a bit. The words 'badly stuffed sausage spring to mind

Not all of us have (or need to have) body image issues though. Some of us choose clothing by function. If I am paddling a kayak in a rough sea I'll choose one set of clothes, if riding a bike I choose clothes that'll do the job in those conditions and if trying to attract the ladeeez I'll dig out a different set again.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So it would seem;

Lycra wearers - it's about comfort and efficiency on the bike.

Baggy wearers - it's about image and lack of self confidence.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

scruff - the pics of the lovely ladies in lycra...aye carramba!!
women in lycra are a good thing, but blokes in lycra can look so very wrong...just look at those dudes in the pic posted by uplink...that is so wrong on so many levels....


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:39 am
 Haze
Posts: 5445
Free Member
 

Pockets.

And there's usually a lengthy spell in the pub at the end of the night.

Lycra only on the road bike.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 10:40 am
Page 1 / 6