Forum menu
whats wrong with 3x...
 

[Closed] whats wrong with 3x9 anyway

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2599018]

been running 1x9 for a while good idea in theory but if I go to wales peaks etc I need my granny ring and when i'm on a club ride the 44t chainring is good for road sections so there you have it i'm back to 27 speed and happy with it 🙂 when it all wears out I might then go for 2x10 my bike may not be fashionable but it works ! 🙂


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Riding a bike that's not fashionable ?
You really don't get mountain biking, do you ?


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 10:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

whats wrong with 3x9 anyway?
Nothing.


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 10:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm looking forward to 11 speed cassettes. Well, it's one better isn't it.


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 10:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I was just thinking out loud


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 10:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"I'm looking forward to 11 speed cassettes"
[url= http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/346769/campagnolo-2009-11-speed-cassette.html ]how about this? (dated june 2008)[/url]


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 10:22 pm
Posts: 7
Free Member
 

Cycling industry needs innovation to survive. If your current stuff works ok for you I say keep it.
If you've the cash and you think the new stuff will be better for you, buy it. But I don't think we should assume new stuff is necessarily better...


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 10:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

3x9 is fine. But I do very little road riding and local hills are mostly doable with 1x9. So what is the point of a front mech, cable, shifter and 2 unused chainrings?


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 17778
Full Member
 

crocodilian - Member

I'm looking forward to 11 speed cassettes. Well, it's one better isn't it.

😆


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 11:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

3x9 - don't you need a beard to ride that niche?


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 11:42 pm
 Taff
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

I ride around Hampshire... We don't have hills worthy of a granny ring.


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 11:44 pm
Posts: 810
Free Member
 

Bike manufacturers are always coming up with products you didn't know you needed.


 
Posted : 25/03/2011 11:44 pm
Posts: 4468
Full Member
 

Nothing at all... But, I found the chainline on 3x9 terrible if I was on the big ring and anyway north of half way up the cassette. I never use the grannyring. Tried 2x9 and always found myself on the wrong chainring, big too big for climbs small too small for anywhere else than steep climbs. I now run a single 38 on a 11-36 cassette, perfect for where I live, I can get up anything I want to and fast enough for 30mph on the road if I need.


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 8:47 am
 7hz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeh I'm enjoying 1x9 as well - 32 chainring, 11-32 cassette. Not missing the big ring at all, used it once a month for a 3 minute road blast, not worth carrying it about for that, 32/11 is fast enough for a MTB. Not missing the granny ring either, use it very rarely and TBH it's easier just to get out the saddle and mash, or get off the bike and walk, than it is to winch up some crazy gradient. Hated the noise from the front dérailleur. Saved 450 grams not having it + chaingrings + shifter + cable.


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 11:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I ride around Hampshire... We don't have hills worthy of a granny ring.

This is true. There's nowt really that can defeat a single speed in Hampshire, tbh.

Mind you, I din't even use my granny ring in North Wales, and they've got some biggish hills there.

When I started MTBing, the smallest front rings were 28t, and the largest rear, 28t too. 1:1 ratio. And I coped. So, when did a 32/32 or 32/34t combo become inadequate?

Granny rings are aptly named...


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be fair, the granny ring on my FS gets a lot of use because the bike is heavier and slacker and climbs much better sat down than stood up.


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 12:58 pm
Posts: 7972
Free Member
 

I'm going 1x8 as soon as I can afford an Alfine


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 1:05 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

I usualy have a beard


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 3:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm running 2x9 and a bash guard now, changed my ratios from 22t inner 32t middle, to 28,38 rear cassette remains a 11-34

its a nice compromise


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

whats wrong with 3x9 anyway

Ground clearance.
That's the only reason I'm 2x9. Fed up getting left behind on the 500m of road on the way home though!


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 4:32 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

3 x 9 all the way, I've gotten soft since 24-28 was the lowest available (about 20 years ago).


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 5:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you bikers with your fancy gears,im sticking with my trusty penny farthing and i've never had a pedal strike


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 5:19 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

I ride single speed as well.


 
Posted : 26/03/2011 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like doubles. On my FS, with a short chain and short mech it is all nicely neat and tucked in. (clearance front and back) (32/22) and is all ratios Ill ever need round here. 3 rings wouldnt work as well on this one IMO

I needed rings for my hack bike, so I run 39/26 with a longer mech which is fine for the road to work and works fine for the occasional off road it does. (it was cheaper to buy 2 rings than 3! I dont want for more gears on the road and I can still go up. Couldnt care less how many rings I run on this one 🙂


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 9:04 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

the main reason for me is that I kept on smashing teeth off 42t rings or gouging my legs. Now I have 36/22 and a bash ring 🙂

3x10 now there is something pointless


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 9:40 am
Posts: 9966
Full Member
 

I'm about to ride from my home in Bedfordshire

I'm horribley unfit and heavy by forum standards so I love having a granny ring

But I'm certain the climbs on my ride today are as steep as any where else in the country


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 11:20 am
 mboy
Posts: 12651
Free Member
 

3x10 now there is something pointless

Have you tried it?

I can tell you it gives you all the benefits of 3x9, only with closer spaced gear ratios both front and back. It really is pretty good!


 
Posted : 27/03/2011 11:55 am