[Closed] What frames fit this prerequiste?

Let me go off and do the research for you 😀

I'll be as quick as I can! 😛

cheers al - seeing as you don't ride a bike you may as well google for me 😉

Is this a quiz? Pretty dull if yes 😉

Edit: can I use my wildcard and say dialled pa 29?

What size wheels? Like al I really want to help

full sus 26" wheels

Well spotted Rob :love:

I'd go steeper on the seat angle on full suss TBH.

I know.

I'm not going to tell you, though.

Lots

Do I win a prize?

The most (in)famous one is folded from used filing cabinets in Yorkshire. Other alternatives are available for non Audi driving, IT working, Surrey dwelling forumites.

Marin wolf ridge/attack trail.

marin 🙄

Orange Five, invoice in the post to you

ah so we suggest stuff and you roll your eyes at us

I am less interested now in helping

I had some suggestions but don't want to say now in case the OP ridicules me with the rolly eyes thing....

Ideally i would want to slacken my ftm by 2 degrees but their is no way 🙁

Bionicon 😀

LOL

If the problem is that no one makes a frame with exactly your required geometry, ask yourself "why"?

i thought the FTM was the bees knees, are you Hora?

TRc running 140s isnt far off..

Err no. The OP is obviously rich.

I dont get the 'must have a slackset' as soon as brant went back to on one.

Fit offset bushes and/or a shorter i-to-i shock if you must.

rob jackson - Member
marin 🙄

🙄

Ever ridden one? Thought not.

30.9 or 31.6 seat tube [b]30.9[/b]
66 or 67 degree head angle [b] 66[/b]
71 ish seat angle [b]73.5[/b]
140 or 150mm front travel [b] 150mm[/b]
43" plus wheel base [b] 45"[/b]

Whyte 146

jackal - unfortunately, YES

I dont get the 'must have a slackset' as soon as brant went back to on one.

rd - love the ftm but wish 2 degrees slacker

Careful I typed 'brant'. He will pop up soon selling frames on this topic 😆

Whats wrong with the el guapo??? Bikeradar loved it just like the ti456 before!!

30.9 or 31.6 seat tube 30.9
66 or 67 degree head angle 66
71 ish seat angle 73.5
140 or 150mm front travel 150mm
43" plus wheel base 45"
Quite flexy
Poor build quality

Whyte 146

ftfy 😉

rob jackson - Member
jackal - unfortunately, YES

An attack trail/wolf ridge?
Its fits every one of your criteria, and you didn't like it.
You sure you know what you actually want?

[url= http://www.morewoodbikes.com/bikes/sukuma#section-gallery ]This one[/url].

Have I missed out on the "2012 Trail Bike" Top Trumps as well as Rob?

😛

jackal - yes- not a ****ing marin!

My first 146 was replaced due to the paint around the BB, structurally it was fine, replacement has been perfect and I cant feel any flex when riding although I have read about it.

Like the look of that Sukuma

Yeti 575.

I do not live in Surrey or own an Audi.

(BMW and Harrogate, is that worse?)

Sukuma...for those that want a boutiqued-2009 specialized stumpjumper.

that is not more than 7lb

30.9 or 31.6 seat tube [b]30.9[/b]
66 or 67 degree head angle [b]67[/b]
71 ish seat angle [b]73[/b]
140 or 150mm front travel [b]150mm[/b]
43" plus wheel base [b]45.6" in Medium[/b]

[b]Spesh Pitch[/b]

30.9 or 31.6 seat tube [b]30.9[/b]
66 or 67 degree head angle [b]67.5[/b]
71 ish seat angle [b]72[/b]
140 or 150mm front travel [b]150mm[/b]
43" plus wheel base [b]44.5" in Large[/b]

[b]2013 Santa Cruz Heckler[/b]

Nukeproof mega tr?

titus made some cracking bikes includig quasimoto and supermoto really class bike the supermoto slight paint issue but rode fab.

El guapo similiar was a great design.......and probably still is...not sure on bb.

for question

Yeti asr 7 with coil rear shock

Mmmmmm still a 575....

Well the Sukuma appears to be far too... [i] gauche[/i] for some of the more discerning members on here, so how about the Pivot Mach 5.7?

i give in whats the answer

and as for previous threads picking a bike based solely on angles and numbers will not lead to happiness

Slack long travel and short wheelbase

Mmmmm wheel toe interface or taller than the empire state.

Would want a long wheel base really - ideally 45"+