Forum menu
The problem is that Comical are based in Andorra, not France...
Commencal are Andorra based, no idea what laws will be in effect there
Ah, in which case ignore that - not EU, so there's doubtless no consumer law protecting you - I'd keep trying being reasonable with them and explaining what has been suggested on here, but I was suggesting legal, because from the sounds of things they're not at all interested in honouring the warranty on this, and unless you have some legal route to force them to honour it, then what they say goes.
At which point the only remaining possibility I can see is a social media campaign.
Unfortunately I think you're right.
By the sounds of things they have decided they don’t want to warranty the frame, so chances are (regardless of emails sent, threats made etc) I'm not going to persuade them to change their mind
The point is they have no reason not to warranty it other than they don’t want to.
Bit of a bummer this thread. I recently got a Meta AM 2012 off a mate, who actually got it as a warranty replacement for a snapped carbon Meta 55. He had no problems getting that replacement.
I'm a bit bigger(fatter) than him, so i'd better make sure my post is long enough!! I was gonna buy a dropper for it after christmas as well.
I got it well cheap though, so couldn't really complain if owt went wrong!!
[quote=jamesfts ]The point is they have no reason not to warranty it other than they don’t want to.
It shows how much a Commencal warranty is worth. I'm sure there are plenty of people on other forms of social media who'd be interested to know that.
Time for Twitter etc? Sounds like they're being a right cunch of bunts 🙁
Depending on their response to this morning's email (which pointed out a lot of the things brought up in this thread) that may be my next and only course of action.
Seems a bit of a ****ty, childish thing to do but it'd probably make me feel better until I can find a replacement frame.
Anyway, [childish][i] they started it! [/i][/childish]
Seems a bit of a ****ty, childish thing to do
well, if [i]they [/i]won't behave like adults...
Hang on, hang on. There's always the 'escalate to the MD' route to redemption if you don't get satisfaction.
Go straight for the "Dear Max" option?
OP, in the pic you posted with the crack, how fard own did your seatpost actually go? Seems like a lot of Commie bashing going on and i just want to make sure it wasn't an error on your part before joining in.
125mm, 35mm passed the 90mm they specify in their owners manual (that I didn't receive).
As mentioned previously I'd like to think this is a one off and wouldn't necessarily be worried about their frames cracking* my problem is with their attitude and how they have handled the situation.
*Googling doesn't turn up much in the way of failures plus I bloody hope not as I've got a v3 sat in the shed too!
jamesfts - Member
Go straight for the "Dear Max" option?
No, you need to let the plebs further down the food chain do their bits first. Raise with customer service/warranty or whatever they're called, if refused escalate to 'warranty manager/customer service director, if refused escalate to MD.
If you end up at the MD, I'd email summary details then follow up by phone. Be polite, firm, persistent and organised. Have all the details to hand and a time line of what's gone on.
DO NOT SHOUT or be rude or swear or whatever. Just keep going until they give up. In short, just pretend you're the love child of TJ and Moly 😀
just pretend you're the love child of TJ and Moly
*shudders*
brant - MemberThe problem I have with frames of this style (which is why I prefer a bent top tube) is that this style isn't really a dropped top tube, it's an extended seat tube.
Worried about my On-One Fatty now, I wonder who designed it.................
If anyone is still interested this was my email to Commencal.
MickaelFurther to our previous email could you please tell me precisely, as a consumer where I would have been informed of this "Your seatpost into the seat tube beyond its minimum 5cm below the top tube” quoted from your previous email. No documentation was provided with the frame that detailed this as the minimum insertion depth.
I’ve gone through the owners manual and have attached the relevant page to this email. The only information printed regarding the seatpost simply states that the minimum insert for a Commencal frame is 90mm - if this is indeed the case I have in fact been exceeding this amount by around 30mm - please see attached photo of my seatpost showing 120mm insert depth. As I have been running more than the required length of seatpost recommended in the manual I believe you are contractually obliged to honour the warranty.
I believe you sell the Meta HT full build with a 350mm static seatpost, to achieve the “5cm below toptube” would require 250mm inserted into the frame leaving only 10cm externally. Based on the numbers you have given me I do not understand how a rider of the recommended height (5’10”-6’2” for larger frames) can set this bike up correctly with the post you provide. I also do not understand how you have arrived at the conclusion that I mounted my seatpost incorrectly. My seatpost was well within the guidelines set out in your user manual so please explain why you are not offering to honour the warranty?
As a long standing customer of Commencal who has more recently bought 2 frames in as many years I’m extremely disappointed in how you’re handling this situation. I’ve always recommended your products to fellow riders and now feel let down and would hate for someone I’ve recommend you to be treated in the same way.
I was planning on ordering my daughter one of your balance bikes and would happily have continued through your range of children's bikes however if this is how you treat your customers I shall be looking elsewhere for our bikes in the future.
I would really like to resolve the situation and continue to be a happy Commencal customer as I do like your bikes, however if you are not prepared to do this I feel the only thing I can do is to take advice on how to resolve this issue in a more formal manner.
I await your response.
Regards,
After waiting all day I got the following reply.
Hi James,The insertion of the seatpost must be of 16,5cm on a frame in size L,
Have a good day,
Best regards
So aside from ignoring 99% of the email that'll be the third different measurement they've given me and they STILL haven't been able to tell me how/where I should have found this information.
I think I'll have to get on the phone tomorrow as this is getting stupid.
It doesn't look like great customer service to me. I can't remember seeing many Commencals about so don't know much about them. The only one that springs to mind is the one I mentioned in a previous thread:
Saw a youth at Whinlatter riding a Commencal. It looked quite handy, as did he. We were on the south loop at that section where the up and down cross over and there are (were?) two tiny north shore rampy things on the downhill section.He teed himself up for the harder one with the actual proper drop at the end. He landed it beautifully, but alas his down tube and top tube both broke just behind the head tube and left him riding a unicycle and spare handlebar into the dirt.
He smacked his face up a bit and was sat there looking well dazed, confused and understandably hurt. He'd done so well, poor little mite.
He had a Commencal. Neither of my kids ever will.
HTHC
That was hardly a measured response to your well worded email. Has put me completely off buy anything from them.
Try on the phone, more difficult (but not impossible) to be that ignorant when speaking to someone rather than hiding behind a computer.
This is the sort of situation that makes you wish that there were mountain bike journalists who will investigate.
If someone from stw (for example) wrote to them and asked for an answer for publication I suspect there would be a fuller response.
have you social media'ed them? Twitter and/or facebook them with that poor response to your claim.
Well that's a bit rough and I know how frustrated you must feel, had a similar situation with the jokers at Trek a few years ago.
But looking on the bright side, it'll make an awesomely on-trend long and low frame for somebody if you do Brant's first modification.
Phoning them will be on my jobs for tomorrow, I've asked email monkey for contact details of their warranty manager/customer service director though I'm not holding my breath and expect to be sat listening to hold music before getting repeatedly cut off.
I've purposely not gone to social media yet as I'd like to keep the moral high ground as long as possible or at least until they've give me a definitive "eff off".
They've already done that repeatedly from what I can see. Extremely shoddy behaviour from Commencal and I agree with wwaswas regarding journalists.
Stw *is* social media.
You'll get far more reads, reach, on here than twitter or Facebook.
Why not tweet the MD and founder, just to let him know how well your being treated
https://twitter.com/maxcommencal
You could tweet him a link to this thread.
I wouldn't hold your breath for any bike mag to take up your cause though
[quote=chakaping ]You could tweet him a link to this thread.
I wouldn't hold your breath for any bike mag to take up your cause though
we could all tweet him a link 😉
I've tweeted @commencal about this. Very shoddy back up I think, hope it helps.
This all seems exceptionally harsh.
When owning and cracking several commencals in the past I was dealt with via Madison and Evans and had great customer service from them. So it's a shame it's now direct dealing only...
Just a thought......you're asking a number of different questions in your, admittedly very nicely worded, email; maybe the guy is struggling to understand, thinks he's answering them & is confused as to why you keep emailing him. Maybe. But probably not.
That was the question I forgot to ask last night...
Is there anywhere that sells the full builds or anyone who has a full build in your size with their standard post that can confirm it was supplied with a seat post that is too short ?
I've tweeted him a link ...Hope it gets sorted.
Would never touch them
Munrobiker can't believe you've got one! It'll end up in a million pieces
Stw *is* social media.
Very true, what I really meant was *their* social media.
I'll possibly start a new threat with a slightly more SEO friendly title at some point though I'm sure if someone searches "Cracked Commencal Meta HT" this should turn up.
Just a thought......you're asking a number of different questions in your, admittedly very nicely worded, email; maybe the guy is struggling to understand, thinks he's answering them & is confused as to why you keep emailing him. Maybe. But probably not.
That did cross my mind. I think the language barrier may being used by them though I'm sure if my email was about something more positive they'd make the effort.
Is there anywhere that sells the full builds or anyone who has a full build in your size with their standard post that can confirm it was supplied with a seat post that is too short ?
They ship the bike with a 350mm static post according to their website, so to comply with their 165mm rule would leave 135mm of exposed post max which I'm pretty sure wouldn't be enough for their size range. I'll measure what I was having to run tonight.
Thanks for the Tweets/support/commiserations.
Rocketman that's very interesting!
Just a thought......you're asking a number of different questions in your, admittedly very nicely worded, email; maybe the guy is struggling to understand, thinks he's answering them & is confused as to why you keep emailing him. Maybe. But probably not.
I'll bet that by the time its been through google translate for the warranty bloke to read, its indecipherable.
I'm pretty sure wouldn't be enough for their size range. I'll measure what I was having to run tonight
Pretty sure doesn't cut it mate. You need definition.
If you can show that running a large with the seatpost provided and inserted the required length would mean you'd have to be 4'11" to ride it then you have something... if it shows you can be 5'11" then you're struggling...
but without knowing fully, you're just using guesswork and blind hope.
HOLD FIRE!!
Following a slightly shittier email last night requesting contact details for their warranty manager/customer service director I've received the following...
Hi James,We didn’t write it anywhere because it seems logical to insert your seat tube that deep (deeper than the top tube). Obviously, we were wrong.
That’s why we’re going to replace your frame, but be sure your seat post will be correctly inserted on this new one.
You can choose a 2016 Meta HT frame which exists in yellow or red, or, if you think you need an XL size, we have one last listed as second hand but in perfect conditions with clear protect already installed.
Please tell me which one you are interested in. I also need you to fulfill the attached form and to send us a picture of the serial number engraved under the bottom bracket.
Best regards
If your frame requires a stupidly long seatpost to fit riders of the specified size (due to bad design or otherwise) I'd say it seems bloody logical to inform buyers of said frame!
Either way it's a result and would imagine the Tweets and links to this thread have helped so thanks again to all.
I'd start a MTBR thread too. We are a relatively small market, the USA isn't.
Happy days...
Either way it's a result
Good news. Hope you get it built up OK
Commencal were fine with me. I think we both knew the seatpost wasn't in that far (beyond the brace but not beyond the top tube/seat tube junction) but they swapped it anyway
Hope you get it built up OK
You're kidding right?
It'll be on eBay or in the classifieds before the box is opened! Still debating keeping the V3.
Ah, good news, finally!
in the classifieds before the box is opened!
May I suggest a different user name if you pop it in the classifieds 😉
