Forum menu
Ugly bikes........l...
 

[Closed] Ugly bikes........love or loathe?

 ton
Posts: 24280
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#4905560]

all good in my eyes. is yours ugly too.

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8507/8506915467_678db3a31f.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8507/8506915467_678db3a31f.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/91703444@N06/8506915467/ ]25.02.13 ugly bike 001[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/91703444@N06/ ]20ston[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 7:23 pm
 Kato
Posts: 825
Full Member
 

My old Preston was ugly as, but I loved it. Wish i'd not sold it now

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 7:38 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

ton - I'm not getting "ugly" from that pic.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 7:44 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

I only have ugly bikes, sod mainstream


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 7:44 pm
 ton
Posts: 24280
Full Member
Topic starter
 

ton - I'm not getting "ugly" from that pic.

purposefull then? ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 7:46 pm
Posts: 5047
Full Member
 

usable would be my description.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 7:58 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

for truly epic ugly you need a pronghorn....or Halifax filing cabinet. Nothing else can match the "welded by a blind chimp" beauty of a five or the truly orthopaedic shoe proportions of a pronghorn.

They make my eyes do a little vomit


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 8:03 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

It might look better with proper, man-sized wheels and with tyres like those you might be able to fit them in.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 8:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kato, who the hell brought that thing? ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 8:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sheesh Tony, that's on hell of a Bergen you've got under yer saddle there buddy.. ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 8:48 pm
 Kato
Posts: 825
Full Member
 

I can't remember. He had a dog and a white cane though


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 8:49 pm
Posts: 66109
Full Member
 

My Hemlock is, er, functional. But I love it, honestly the best bike I've ridden, and not by a little. Absolutely filled with Rightness.

[IMG] [/IMG]

But looks quite a lot like this:

[img] [/img]

My Dare on the other hand...

[url= http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6239/6348502125_cca88922aa_b.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6239/6348502125_cca88922aa_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/53860438@N06/6348502125/ ]IMG_0346[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/53860438@N06/ ]Northwindlowlander[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 8:55 pm
Posts: 1543
Full Member
 

The Dare is winning this competition for me so far ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 9:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Ellsworth is shocking.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 9:08 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

I love that Dare.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 9:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Argh, even the Preston looks good next to the Dare! *says the Five owner*


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 9:11 pm
 ton
Posts: 24280
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Sheesh Tony, that's on hell of a Bergen you've got under yer saddle there buddy..

sandwich box that mate... ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 9:12 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

no, the dare is soooo wrong it's right. It's a bit like granny porn, you know it'll make most folks vomit and then after a while you appreciate that you can still get jiggy with it


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 9:14 pm
Posts: 66109
Full Member
 

It was properly ****... The guy I sold it to was convinced it was beautiful. I did consider calling the police.

For the loverz and the haterz,

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8342/8189854259_9ef681caf3_b.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8342/8189854259_9ef681caf3_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/53860438@N06/8189854259/ ]IMG_0341[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/53860438@N06/ ]Northwindlowlander[/url], on Flickr

It's like 2 different teams of designers both sat down to design the world's ugliest bike, without comparing notes, then they combined the results by chopping them in half and nailing them together.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 9:17 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

*rubs thighs* phwooooar.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 9:23 pm
Posts: 23592
Full Member
 

My Hemlock is, er, functional

The front end is fine - the rear looks like someones GCSE coursework ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 10:43 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Are we talking about bikes, or Ton's lunchbox here?


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 10:47 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12651
Free Member
 

for truly epic ugly you need a pronghorn

Couldn't agree more...

They make my Maverick look like a thing of beauty!

[img] [/img]

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 10:48 pm
Posts: 6317
Full Member
 

for truly epic ugly you need a pronghorn....or Halifax filing cabinet.
Nothing else can match the "welded by a blind chimp" beauty of a
five or the truly orthopaedic shoe proportions of a pronghorn.
They make my eyes do a little vomit

Got 2 Pronghorns, and while the PR6-LT is very gopping, I think the XC-SW Carbon is positively sublime. Proper function over form over function madness.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 10:48 pm
Posts: 10534
Full Member
 

Well these are my 2 beauty's!!

[url=http:// [url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8149/7582093034_cd6f6b163e.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8149/7582093034_cd6f6b163e.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/55623703@N05/7582093034/ ]Orange Five at Silton[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/55623703@N05/ ]Adam Branston[/url], on Flickr][/url]
[url=http:// [url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8334/8112051732_8731902d84.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8334/8112051732_8731902d84.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/55623703@N05/8112051732/ ]20121021_151109[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/55623703@N05/ ]Adam Branston[/url], on Flickr][/url]

I love em both!


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 10:51 pm
 Kato
Posts: 825
Full Member
 

The Mav is a looker! I always wanted one of those


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 11:03 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

would post my ellsworth but I won't be responsible for ruining so many keyboards


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 11:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Amateurs ๐Ÿ˜‰

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 11:06 pm
Posts: 66109
Full Member
 

I love the combo of Maverick + reversed layback Thomson, it's in a wibbly wobbly world of its own.


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 11:06 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

[img] ?psid=1[/img]

stuff it, i hate you all anyway ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 25/02/2013 11:08 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12651
Free Member
 

I love the combo of Maverick + reversed layback Thomson, it's in a wibbly wobbly world of its own.

Right on cue...

[img] [/img]

Mr. Soft, please tell me why the world that you live in is so strange! ๐Ÿ˜‰

The Mav is a looker!

I wouldn't go that far... Rides brilliantly though!

stuff it, i hate you all anyway

As Ellsworth's go, that's positively restrained! Almost conventional you might say...


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 12:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Northwind that bike looks like a very overly stretched frame


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 12:42 am
Posts: 932
Full Member
 

Well none of my gcse groups would ever get to make anything so fugly ๐Ÿ˜‰ i do quite like that mboy curver is that wrong? I think my giant trance is not too great looking but i like it loads apart from the brakes at the moment AARGJHH


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 12:47 am
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

A 150mm stem would finish that Klein off nicely.


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 8:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

no, the dare is soooo wrong it's right. It's a bit like granny porn, you know it'll make most folks vomit and then after a while you appreciate that you can still get jiggy with it

๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 9:44 am
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

Fantasic ๐Ÿ™‚

That layback post + Maverick looks like some optical illusion.

Half the reason to buy a bike is what it makes you feel when you look at it.


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 10:25 am
Posts: 23
Full Member
 

Built up a spare parts bike a few years back, with a cheap full sus frame I found on ebay.

[img] [/img]

In retrospect I want to dig it out the cupboard under the stairs and build it up again. It even had some Floats for a while, its biggest failing was the rear shock was absolute turd.


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 11:03 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

That red thing - I had forgotten about this until I saw that pic: My mum bought a cheap exercise bike... my brother weighed a little too much and sat on the thing and started pedaling... gradually the seat bent until he was sat on the floor.


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 11:22 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Here's a hideous beast
[img] ?w=900[/img]


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 11:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sponging-Machine - Member
A 150mm stem would finish that Klein off nicely.

It's already got a 120. I think that's quite long enough ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 11:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I recently discovered my bike being slammed on a french website- They hate it! ๐Ÿ˜€

http://www.vtt-max.com/2012/11/yeti-lefty-ca-rime/#_


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 11:29 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

clubber

Amateurs

[img] [/img]
/p>

I'm interested to know what that feels like to ride? Does it feel like the frames snapped in half every time the rear suspension articulates and takes the BB away with it?? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's actually really quite good as a SS full sus because it stiffens when standing to gurn so it doesn't bob around. It's more like a soft tail than a proper full sus though - it takes the edge off bumps rather than being plush despite actually having about 7" travel.

When seated, it feels pretty normal - I can't say that I've ever noticed it feel like the BB is moving a lot with one particular exception - if accelerating out of a tight corner while seated, you feel the back whole bike kind of tuck up and it feels like your effort's going nowhere.

Oh and it can be scary on steep drops if you run with any signifiance sag as the saddle suddenly rises just as you go over the edge! I run with little sag ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 3:23 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

Ade Ward has normally popped up on ugly bike threads by now. In his absence I'll post....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/02/2013 3:29 pm
 hock
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry, the 2nd Ellsworth won't win this competition. It's not half as ugly as the first.

Pinetree, you probably feel honoured, don't you? Rightly so!

The last one should be considered a piece of art. Early phase of Pop Rat Brutalism or something.


 
Posted : 27/02/2013 12:11 am
Page 1 / 2