Forum menu
ok really confused about what tyres to buy - need xc tyres for orange 5 - - have had kenda nevegals 2.35 found them 2 grippy/sticky on the tarmac although good for punctures - was thinking schwalbe nobby nics 2.25 on front and rocket rons 2.25 on back - mostly riding holmfirth pennine area, peaks and lakes 2 - 3 times a year and maybe 3 or 4 trail centres - please help they are too many options and its doing my nut in !!
I liked Advantages as they were quite fast rolling, but they didnt really offer much grip on wet rocks. Also, seemed to get a lot of pinch flats!
Made the sacrifice for more grip by going with 2.35 High rollers. 60a on the back and super tacky on the front
"kenda nevegals 2.35 found them 2 grippy/sticky on the tarmac"
Which ones? StickE (50a) or DTC? (50a edges, 60a middle) It'll make a fair bit of difference
You could try the 2.1" DTC versions? Seem very well behaved pretty much everywhere, could be a touch faster though (as everything could)
2.35" (60a) High Rollers (even the folding ones) sound like they'd be a bit too slow for what you're after
StickE mate - apart from price the schwalbe 's seem good in the reviews
anyone !
High Roller front, Larsen rear
Nobby Nics are shite. Highrollers for the win.
on my 5, I have 2.35 Rampages front and rear - suits me !
Much empathy here - similar geographical area and ride a 575 with a combination of high rollers and ignitors but find them too draggy. Difficult to get any consensus opinion on the right tyre choice as it's just far too subjective. I'd like to try various options, but finances preclude and I suspect that for most average ability riders it makes little difference what you choose. I suspect there is no nirvana (unless you're buddhist)
I'm getting on rather well with Kenda Small Blocks - although they're absolutely not four season rubber.
Nevegal 2.5 front, Small Block 8 2.1 rear. Odd but it seems to work.
thinking of trying some rubber queen's 2.2" or some wild grip R 2.25", any body tryed them. I've got nobby nic's at the moment very good tyres but not to strong.
Anyone tried Ardents?
Maxxis Highroller 2.35(60a) front and Highroller XC(60a) 2.1 rear. Seems good so far.
Was on advantage 2.1 rear which was way bigger but side wall split on a road ride and lost confidence in it's durability.
If you had 2.35 stick-e nevegals on both ends then I salute you! Grip like velcro, roll like bricks. I'd say go with the 2.1s, stick-e on the front, classic combo.
Rubberqueen front rendez rear?
Could also try Kenda Blue Groove DTC 2.3 front and Nevegal 2.3 DTC rear, if you like the Nevegals for everything except tarmac then just change the compound, been using the above all year round on my 5 running them tubeless, roll ok on tarmac and grip ok on all sorts of off road conditions, mud, ice, snow, roots, rocks etc
Dare I suggest Conti MK Pro 2.4s?? OK maybe not 🙂 I've been running these for over a year on my 5 in The Peaks and they've been more than fine for most conditions.
True, they are not the grippiest of tyres but are light, tough, hard wearing and more importantly roll really quickly.
I've had Maxxis Advantage 2.25s on the 5 before this. They were OK but in my opinion not as good as the Contis. I also tried a Kenda BG 2.35 DTC front and Nevegal 2.35 DTC rear. As you've stated, found them to be too grippy and very draggy and removed after 2 weeks.
Currently considering Maxxis HR front and Larsen TT rear, WTB Wierwolfs, Schwalbe Fat Alberts or Nobby Nics.
There's no point getting a larsen or crossmark for the rear while the rendez is around. It looks like it wouldn't grip but it's supposedly great in most conditions including mud. (Definately a rear tyre though)
StickE mate
That's why they seem draggy.
i have 'Kenda Nevegal' on the 'rear tyre' and 'Kenda Blue Groove' on 'front tyre' on my orange five....