Forum menu
tubeless v durl cha...
 

[Closed] tubeless v durl chamber

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#6319117]

So if tubeless is ment to be the best thing since sliced bread how do the manufacturers exain these new durl chamber set ups


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 10:02 pm
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

Eh?


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 10:06 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Dual chamber, wasn't it idea that came out a while ago then radio silence?

OP tubeless is what 12+ years old? What can you tell us about dual chamber?


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 10:08 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Different. Weighs more, but less chance of puncturing for more aggressive riding.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 10:08 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

So if v brakes were meant to be the best thing since sliced bread why did they makes discs?

It looks like a solution for the 10% of people running very hard who want the best of both worlds and will accept a weight penalty.


 
Posted : 05/07/2014 11:53 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

cynic-al - Member

Dual chamber, wasn't it idea that came out a while ago then radio silence?

Nah, on its way to market now under the Procore name.

Really not sure what your point is though OP? Tubeless is excellent- Procore is a way of making tubeless do something different.


 
Posted : 06/07/2014 12:34 am