Titus rockstar - wh...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Titus rockstar - why no 1X drivetrain?

14 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
167 Views
Posts: 1226
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I've thought about getting one of the discounted rockstar frames from on one but then noticed that the description stated that it is not compatable with 1X drivetrains. I asked on one customer service why this is and got a short reply of ' the chainring fails' ?!?

Can anyone clarify why it is not 1X compatable and secondly, what on one are on about with their reply


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:07 pm
Posts: 43532
Full Member
 

Chainstay too wide causing interference with the chainring?


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:18 pm
Posts: 9825
Full Member
 

I have to know now


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:19 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

I would say its the dropout/horst link position. I suspect that 11 spd SRAM and Shimano mechs would both struggle to not catch on the pivot. Of course it [i]is[/i] 1x compatible by definition if it can run 2 or 3x, I suspect they mean dedicated 1x set ups.


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hmm that means im putting my 2x10 off my hardtail onto the rockstar and the hardtail gets a new groupset... 😀


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:28 pm
 cp
Posts: 8943
Full Member
 

I assume by fails they mean fouls.

But why would it..? Lets say you run a triple on it.. I assume they are fine with triples. Remove rings and put nw in middle ring position. That is physically no different to a triple, just with less chain rings.

Perhaps running a single ring in the inner ring position of a double will foul. But then... Surely they should say.. Runs fine 1x but use a triple crank.


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:29 pm
Posts: 1226
Full Member
Topic starter
 

@cp - my thoughts exactly! i just dont get it as i just cant see how a frame cannot be 1X compatable. I was going to use a double crankset with nw ring in the outside position, which is the same as running a double setup.


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Maybe the chainline will be shit?


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:36 pm
Posts: 4359
Full Member
 

Wouldn't it be shit in the middle ring of a triple as well then?


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:40 pm
Posts: 13802
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:48 pm
Posts: 1226
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Has your chainring failed yet? 🙂


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:49 pm
Posts: 24367
Full Member
 

is it the photo or is that TT super short?


 
Posted : 26/01/2016 7:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just seen this post the bike above is my mates and mine is 1x10 as well with no issues as above surely it would be no good in the middle ring either if 1x10 was no good??


 
Posted : 05/02/2016 6:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] .html[/img]

Both of us have had no problems with 1x10


 
Posted : 05/02/2016 6:19 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I'm no expert but my guess would be that they assume you mean a dedicated Sram 1x11 system which would probably make the chain foul on the pivot or something, my Codeine has about 1billlionthhh of a millimetre clearance, a 1x10 would be slightly narrower.


 
Posted : 05/02/2016 7:07 pm