Though it is at least 'Retro' 😆 A 1974 Carlton Cobra, in polished chrome with (apparently?) ti tubing!? mmmmmm, shiny 8)
[img] 
[/img]
[img] 
[/img]
[img] 
[/img]
I have seen more attractive plumbing.
Surely needs a brooks?
Ti? 1974? Hmm. Stick a magnet on it, that should reveal the truth...
Can you chrome plate Titanium?
I have seen more attractive plumbing.
The youth of today, no class! 😉
Surely needs a brooks?
Defo needs a brooks imo, though that's apparently a vintage San Marco saddle...
The youth of today, no class!
I think Jamie is older then me... 😉
Ti? 1974? Hmm. Stick a magnet on it, that should reveal the truth...
Indeed... a magnet will reveal all 🙂
Interestingly... digging around on the interweb, found this post on Retrobike that mentions the same serial number as the seller of this frame...
[url= http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=105339 ]Retorbike[/url]
[url= http://www.gumtree.com/london/32/65173232.html ]Gumtree ad[/url]
I think Jamie is older then me... 😉
Ah, was just taking a punt there 😆
I reckon the Ti refers to Tube Investments who owned Raleigh and Reynolds rather than the metal.
ahhh... makes sense! goes to show what I know of cycling history! 😳
lovely, nice and simple.
Not likely to be Ti, That's just an old Carlton - it has pump pegs, mudguard clearance and hanger for old centre pulls.
Tubular investments?
Mine will look stunning this winter.
Edit...ooh and a lamp bracket. Not a turd by any means, but still polished. Looks like the sort of thing the factory would give to visiting royals.....must weigh a to as well?
[url= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4089/4964582852_80e3fd6eed.jp g" target="_blank">
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/macchiato1/4964582852/ ]For Sale[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/macchiato1/ ]Lay-Luh[/url], on Flickr
is that yours RD?
[i]For Sale by Lay-Luh, on Flickr [/i]
Jeez the tat that excites folk. Faddists.
There is something very wrong about that saddle on that bike..
Apart from that looks nice.
