Forum menu
The Trek 69er
 

[Closed] The Trek 69er

Posts: 9112
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#9597666]

Does anyone remember this? Did anyone have one?

The first time I saw one, I had to hold in my lunch. Just now, I had a sudden flashback, and actually wondered if they performed any particular function, or if they were just a passing experiment.

Anyway, if you are suffering indigestion, and want to cleanse, here you go:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 7:02 pm
Posts: 6316
Full Member
 

I've recently been running my Dialled Love Hate as a 69er with rigid forks. Works really well.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 7:06 pm
Posts: 10978
Free Member
 

A great concept, particularly for the vertically challenged.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 7:17 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

It was for people who weren't ready to go the full big wheeler experience. Those people now have 27.5" wheels.

Couple of fellas won some big races on those Treks didn't they?


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 7:20 pm
Posts: 12956
Free Member
 

There were two at ssuk.

I think there were two... Maybe my vision was blurring.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 7:21 pm
Posts: 10978
Free Member
 

Matt Carr, Shaggy & Travis Brown competed on them iirc. Small wheel to accelerate up to speed & turn quickly with a large front to roll over things nicely.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 7:30 pm
Posts: 24439
Full Member
 

Had one, got nicked 😐


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 7:39 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

I preferred the 2nd version without the Mav forks. 'Raced' one at the Singlespeed Worlds in Napa.

[url= https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3213/2804317638_8a96d95976_z.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3213/2804317638_8a96d95976_z.jp g"/> ?zz=1[/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/5gNRW7 ]SSWC 2008[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/simondbarnes/ ]Simon Barnes[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 7:42 pm
Posts: 4972
Full Member
 

I know where theres a frame sat in a garage unloved and un ridden .


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 8:11 pm
Posts: 10978
Free Member
 

15.5" ❓


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 8:13 pm
Posts: 6050
Free Member
 

There were two at SSUK17 they were fighting over the number 69 🙂


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 8:16 pm
Posts: 3643
Full Member
 

Mrs rode a Carver 96er for a couple of years - sold frame to someone on here.

My radbike was also a 96er at this year's ssuk, mainly because I couldn't be bothered making a full custom rear triangle (had a 26 donor frame).


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 8:17 pm
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

Didn't a on one 456 with a bodged 69er get rave reviews?


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 8:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I loved the look.
Matt, the staffer off here, rode one at the SSWC in Aviemore.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 8:28 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

We all had one at Aviemore! It was year of the brown trek!

Got a great pic of me on mine by Russ Burton somewhere. Great bikes. Jenn managed the tour divide on one too. Only trek I’ve ever bought.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 8:46 pm
 td75
Posts: 333
Free Member
 

Always loved the look of these. Thank goodness they rarely come up for sale.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 8:54 pm
 core
Posts: 2770
Free Member
 

Singular hummingbird was also designed to run 29/26 with the rigid fork wasn't it?


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 9:20 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

There's a 19in one of the original Rootbeer ones for sale round the corner from me (not mine), full bike but not original spec, has an Alfine on the back and not got the Maverick any more...


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 9:25 pm
Posts: 8034
Full Member
 

Didn't a on one 456 with a bodged 69er get rave reviews?

It bloody should have done.

It works really well with a 26r rigid fork + 29r front wheel.

A 456 is way too steep and twitchy with a 26r rigid fork and 26" wheel in it (+ short stem / wideish bars).

The 29r front puts the bars and angles about where a 140mm fork would sit sagged.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 9:53 pm
Posts: 2227
Free Member
 

Great bikes.
Better with a rigid fork up front imho.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 9:58 pm
Posts: 7971
Free Member
 

If the rear could take 650 I'd have one now. I'm told putting a 650 rear in my current 29er makes it lots of fun but no one is willing to lend me a wheel to try.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 10:09 pm
Posts: 12809
Free Member
 

Always thought they were great looking bikes, haven’t seen one in years - they must be 10 years old now no?


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 10:12 pm
 LMT
Posts: 543
Free Member
 

On my bike want list, just very rare even on eBay they just dont show up anymore.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 10:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've run 69ers for years. mostly with different guises of Ragley Mmmbop 26in frames, and for various uses. Have a Genesis Grapil which runs a treat as 69er for xc, and 27.5 Maxxis Shorty front 26 rear for muddy conditions. Bloody brilliant.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 10:49 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

.


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 11:03 pm
Posts: 11639
Full Member
 

Finally....a thread i can actually add some value to,

[img] [/img]

Matt alongside St Mary's Loch on his (and shaggys) way to win TransScotland 2007

[img] [/img]

Matt leading the charge on the final day

I thought they were brilliant to ride, ended up turning my Soulcraft ss into a 69'r and finally got under 2 hrs for a lap of Kirroughtree and made long days out in the hills less exhausting so i thought it was a great idea at the time


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 11:07 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

Still got my 19" Carver 96er for sale.........


 
Posted : 09/10/2017 11:09 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

Always liked the look of them myself! I ran my Inbred as a 69er for a while, it worked really well! 🙂


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 12:30 am
Posts: 5296
Free Member
 

I had one for a while. Got it to try singlespeeding at the 8hr Oktoberfst thing at Ashton Park

Really light bikes. I'm not strong enough for singlespeeding. The Maverick fork had way too much travel for that bike, but being able to lock it out/change the geometry was cool.
I loved the look of them. Trek made some cool bikes around that time. I'm after a Sawyer currently


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 5:31 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

These were so rad. 🙂


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 6:53 am
 ctk
Posts: 1811
Free Member
 

Cove did a 69er aswell. There's one on ebay at the mo but set up as a 66er.


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 9:18 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

What the hell's a 66er? 😆


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 10:17 am
Posts: 10197
Full Member
 

loved my Trek 69er, but I got through rear wheels like they were going out of fashion. Yob front end and dainty rear needing some riding finesse did not really get along with my smash and grab style.


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 11:32 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Jenn did the Great Divide on one;

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 11:39 am
Posts: 10978
Free Member
 

one really nice speed
#Jenn


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 11:47 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]one really nice speed[/i]

Made me quite melancholic, the image search results that got me that pic.


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 12:00 pm
Posts: 2091
Full Member
 

core - Member
Singular hummingbird was also designed to run 29/26 with the rigid fork wasn't it?

They were indeed, and they're excellent. Probably the best handling bikes that I've owned.

[url= https://s20.postimg.org/w62et9snh/IMG_0691.jp g" target="_blank">https://s20.postimg.org/w62et9snh/IMG_0691.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

[url= https://s20.postimg.org/l11sbg1jh/IMG_0132.jp g" target="_blank">https://s20.postimg.org/l11sbg1jh/IMG_0132.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 12:07 pm
Posts: 746
Free Member
 

I've had an ss version with Duc forks for about 5 years.
The fast moving rear, tank rolling front is total Bol lacks, but I love it to bits.
Despite all the clever stuff I now own it's still my favourite bike to ride. Sometimes things work and you just don't know why. This does


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 12:11 pm
Posts: 2091
Full Member
 

Despite all the clever stuff I now own it's still my favourite bike to ride. Sometimes things work and you just don't know why. This does

This is how I feel about my Hummingbirds.


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 12:14 pm
Posts: 24439
Full Member
 

I've got a maverick fork waiting for a large frame if anyone has one for next to no money going spare that needs a new home


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 1:39 pm
Posts: 31062
Full Member
 

(the geommetry was very very sorted for the time, whether by design or to incorporate the wheels chosen)


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 1:44 pm
Posts: 618
Full Member
 

As mentioned above I raced them for several years. I really liked them and have many stories from those races. The geometry was good for the era, and the Maverick forked one in particular, always looked great to me. I've still got two of the singlespeeds, and can't see them ever being sold. I had a geared one and a Top Fuel as well, both of which were also great bikes.

The Cove 69er was just a limited colour Stiffie. They always ran 2 26" wheels.


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I ran a ghetto 69er rigid (inbred frame, 26er fork, SS) for a bit. It worked well.


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 4:29 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Useful for me to find the exact point where I care less about performance than looks. I will for example ride a hideous Ellsworth, or fairly ugly Trek or Cotic, but I will not ride a 69er.


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 5:06 pm
Posts: 35
Free Member
 

My wee Carver 96er frame is still for sale, SS and geared drop outs, EBB, silly light, made a really quick bike...£40 plus postage.....[url= https://s20.postimg.org/7i61y4fu5/IMG_0565.jp g" target="_blank">https://s20.postimg.org/7i61y4fu5/IMG_0565.jp g"/> [/img][/url] [url= https://s20.postimg.org/veds3ncq5/IMG_0568.jp g" target="_blank">https://s20.postimg.org/veds3ncq5/IMG_0568.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 10/10/2017 5:32 pm
Page 1 / 2