Forum menu
The reason SC had t...
 

[Closed] The reason SC had to rename the Solo

Posts: 17
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 12:59 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

Not the first time RM have got someone to change the name of their bike to protect theirs. Sensitive souls aren't they...


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 3:15 pm
 Leku
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

God I'm slow. Now I understand 5010..


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 5:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You're not the only one Leku...I've been waiting to find out what they've renamed it to!


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 6:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Err why 5010?


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1198
Full Member
 

God I'm slow. Now I understand 5010..

I'm even slower, I've only just worked that out after seeing your post.


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 6:43 pm
Posts: 1376
Free Member
 

Squint at it


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 6:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Err why 5010?

SOLO
5010

Simple eh? Oh wait, that's some else bike name as well...


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 7:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can see BOLLOX if I squint really hard.


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 7:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh ha ha I see


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 7:38 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Where's the OUTRAGE then? If it was because of Trek or Spesh protecting a brand name, there'd be OUTRAGE! ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 8:31 pm
 nikk
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=bluearsedfly]

I can see BOLLOX if I squint really hard.

You might want to go get that seen too.


 
Posted : 15/02/2015 11:14 pm