Forum menu
Surly ICT or Chines...
 

[Closed] Surly ICT or Chinese Carbon Fat Bike. Help me decide

Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#8238044]

Got the Fat Bike bug after getting a Calibre Dune and fancy treating myself to a new frameset. Narrowed it down to
1.Surly ICT in good ol' steel
2.ICAN SN01 Carbon stealth bike

Geometry and price is similar but the carbon fatty is obviously a good bit lighter.

Help me decide please


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 9:28 pm
Posts: 6761
Full Member
 

I'm biased based on my ICAN purchases, so it would be the carbon bike and their carbon rims for easy tubeless

Great company to work with, very responsive and the stuff is good too.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 9:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Biased as I am, get the ICT, it's heavy, but it rides like a dream.

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 9:34 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've had 9 fat bikes, just bought an ICT today

its not as heavy as you would expect

and I haven't heard anyone say they feel the weight when riding, they are very well sorted

and one of the only 5" tyre equipped bikes,

the older model had 100mm rims, new ones have only 80mm, which is much less bad ass !


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 9:44 pm
Posts: 2370
Full Member
 

ICT but then I've been really impressed with how Surly's ride.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 9:48 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

3-1 Surly


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 9:52 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Will be going for a frameset cozz as I'm currently waiting on Spokes for these

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 9:55 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I'd get the Surly.
I like Surlys.

And a carbon fat bike is just wrong, in much the same manner as a plasticene hovercraft, a concrete poncho or a nettle suppository.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 9:58 pm
Posts: 43949
Full Member
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Knock out to Surly


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:08 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if you are only fitting 80mm rims - then why not get a wednesday?

aren't the frames very similar but quite a bit cheaper, and you don't need 190mm rear end


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:43 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

In the true spirit of Singletrack forum members, I would recommend you having a look at what I have.

Take a trip over to the Alpkit website, and have a look at the Vir Fortis carbon fat bike.

Can't do any direct comparison , but the Vir Fortis is very good, and very light. Can fit 5" tyres if you want as well.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:44 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

80 mm rims but 4.8 inch tyre 🙂
Like the idea of a Bluto option when required


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 10:52 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Have ordered the ICT. Think it will be a perfect partner for my Stooge


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:04 pm
Posts: 6289
Full Member
 

Good call 🙂 Not that I've ridden the ICAN frame, It could be lovely for all I know, but if you're after pictures of an ICT with BR710 rims, I have plenty 🙂

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:15 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yes please roverpig. Is that a medium?


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:20 pm
Posts: 6289
Full Member
 

No it's a large. I'm 6' tall with something like a 33" inside leg and it fits me well.

It's kind of obvious really, with them being so big, but tyres do make a huge difference. I'm using Jumbo Jims in the summer and Bud/Lou in the winter (both 4.8"). The difference is quite dramatic.

Anyway, be careful what you wish for 🙂

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

Unfortunately, me buying a fatbike seems to have broken winter, so no pictures in the snow yet.


 
Posted : 20/12/2016 11:50 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Looks great. Loving the blue rim tape.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 2:59 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

ICT is definitely cooler. I'd go for it just for the name to be honest. 🙂


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 7:48 am
Posts: 2429
Full Member
Posts: 2429
Full Member
Posts: 2429
Full Member
 

http://singletrackworld.com/reviews/first-date-surly-ice-cream-truck/ 😆

Hope this helps?


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 8:53 am
Posts: 2429
Full Member
 

Oh and Charlie the Bikemonger has frames in stock.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 8:55 am
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've ordered the frameset. Just trying to figure out how to fit my Turbine Cinch cranks now. Spacer hell


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 10:17 am
Posts: 6932
Full Member
 

ICT takes a Pressfit 41mm dia BB - shouldn't be any need for spacers assuming you have a 120mm spindle crank. Hope PF41/30mm is another option


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 10:24 am
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Spacers are required for the Cinch cranks, in fact Race Face do (did?) a spacer kit specifically for the ICT. I just can't get one this side of the Atlantic.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 10:35 am
 accu
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

good choice...
I bought an ICT ops frame back in november and right now I´m waiting for the last parts to start the build .. :-)...
cranks will be also RF turbine and so I was looking for the ICT spacer kit ..no chance ..
meanwhile I bought the standard spacers
http://www.ubyk.co.uk/race-face-cinch-bb30-spacer-conversion-kit/19696
and will put them on the lathe to make it fit..
with the hope stainless PF41-30BB
thats from MTBR ..the ICT spacers
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 11:42 am
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers acu, that's some impressive patience right there.
I've bought 2 of [url= http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Race-Face-F10011-Cinch-Bottom-Bracket-Spindle-Kit-BB386/401053642180?_trksid=p2045573.c100033.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111001%26algo%3DREC.SEED%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D38661%26meid%3Dbfcac09bac034b09b6ffb0b34b05d94d%26pid%3D100033%26rk%3D2%26rkt%3D8%26sd%3D401053606930 ]this[/url] kit each which has 5 off 2.5 mm spacers.
Fairly sure the ICT kit has 6 off 2.5 mm spacers so this should do the job. Not adverse to a spot of bodging if necessary.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There was always a part of me that regretted buying the ICT as a complete bike (even though it was pretty heavily discounted). Just looking at that picture of the crank spacers makes me glad I did. I am not smart enough.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:03 pm
Posts: 6761
Full Member
 

Industry standards ... Do not generally apply to Fatbikes...

Hope the build goes well


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:08 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers rickmeister.

All part of the fun. Bike builds are all a bit easy these days. Not enough filing bits off chain devices to make them fit anymore.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:12 pm
Posts: 6761
Full Member
 

It was the front / rear disc spacing one that got me when I fitted the brakes..

Had to make a bracket up for that one...

As you say, its half the fun.

I don't know if you are running 1x or 2x but I have a front mech with a Problem Solver spacer for wide cranks here, new, looking for a home..


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:15 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Will be running 1x with a lovely Absolute black oval chainring.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:19 pm
Posts: 3064
Full Member
 

Much as I love steel, I love my carbon fatbike (dude) even more. It's my one bike to rule them all, no question. So much more pleasurable uphill, whether pedalling or carrying.
OP, I have various 190 cranks, new ones, for sale. Email in profile if you are interested.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@guitarhero - I've the AEffect cranks (cheapskate*) on my Singular Puffin rather than the Cinch. I run the AB oval chainring, direct mount, makes quite a bit of difference.

*actually I couldn't run the Cinches as I'm limited to 24mm spindle due to the EBB on the Puffin and the Cinch is 30mm


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:35 pm
 accu
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Industry standards ... Do not generally apply to Fatbikes...

yep...just "converted" a 32mm salsa flip lock seatclamp to the
"ICT standard"... 33.1mm 😀


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:44 pm
Posts: 108
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bugger forgot about seat clamp.

Edit: Phew, seem the frameset comes with a clamp. Would quite like a QR though


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:50 pm
Posts: 9216
Free Member
 

Was <£1500 Canyon Dude ever considered?

https://www.canyon.com/en-gb/mtb/dude/dude-cf-8-0.html

Good luck with the ICT build!


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:51 pm
 Andy
Posts: 3348
Free Member
 

Accu did you just open it out or doing anything else. I'd like to fit a QR seat clamp to my Wednesday.

OP, I wanted an ICT, but ended up with a Wednesday - its not light - but rides fantastic 😀


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:52 pm
Posts: 6289
Full Member
 

I love a bike build as much as the next guy, but I must admit I wimped out and bought the Surly OD cranks and BB for my ICT build 😳

I can't say I've ever noticed the weight of the ICT when I'm riding it. I notice the difference in tyres. With Jumbo Jims it loves to climb, but with Bud/Lou I really feel the drag. The grip coming back down is unreal though.

Where I do notice all of the 35 lbs is lifting it onto the car, over a fence or just onto my shoulders for some hike-a-bike. The latter being a regular occurrence as it eggs me on to explore the places where trails go to die. So, I wouldn't rule out a plastic fat bike one day. I just need to convince myself that I'm not going to lose any of the fun that I get from this big steel lump of a bike.

Ps. I'm sure my frame came with a seat clamp


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 12:54 pm
 accu
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

andy, I put it on the lathe,
but a mate used the original 32mm salsa flip lock clamp for nearly
a year on his wednesday, he just opened it enough with a screwdriver !

the ICT comes with the surly constrictor seatclamp but i wanted one with a lever..

salsa used to make a flip lock clamp in 33.1, but thats the same with the spacer kit, no chance to get one, even in the US its very rare


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 1:18 pm
 Andy
Posts: 3348
Free Member
 

All Surly frames ship with seatclamp, I believe. Thanks Accu


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My wife has a Surly Wednesday, not sure of the weight but it's significantly more than the 14Kg of my Puffin. Given that both are steel frames then the difference has to be in either the wheels/tyres or the components.

Checking [url= https://fat-bike.com/2012/01/tire-weights-for-fat-bikes/ ]the list here[/url] the Nates (27tpi) come in at 1690g each and my Vanhelgas are 1340g so that's 750g. I've a carbon fork whereas the fork on the Wednesday is steel, probably another kilo there.

She also notes that it's a pig to lift around but that the weight isn't really noticeable once she's riding it.


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd love an ICT, just haven't got the spare cash or room at the min, even now when Charlie has them for £1.6k.

I've just bought back my old Karate Monkey (full M875 XT bits - wheels/brakes/groupset) from my brother. Thinking I need to try 650B+ or 29" x 50mm rims with a 2.5 on the back and 3.0 on the front....

Love surlys though, they make great bikes, enjoy the Truck!


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 3:04 pm
Posts: 2370
Full Member
 

grenosteve - Member

I've just bought back my old Karate Monkey (full M875 XT bits - wheels/brakes/groupset) from my brother. Thinking I need to try 650B+ or 29" x 50mm rims with a 2.5 on the back and 3.0 on the front....

Love surlys though, they make great bikes, enjoy the Truck!

I totally get that - like I said earlier I'm a fan of how Surly's ride. So much so I've just bought a KM Ops to go alongside my Pug!


 
Posted : 21/12/2016 3:10 pm
Page 1 / 2