Forum search & shortcuts

SRAM 1x12 group?
 

[Closed] SRAM 1x12 group?

Posts: 840
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#7594709]

Via reddit - [url= http://imgur.com/a/VIkNS ]SRAM supposedly launching a 1x12 group with a 10-50 cassette[/url].

April fools? Madness? Genius?


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 10:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pretty clear that is not supposed to be on the web!

Nothing is going to be officially confirmed at this stage (just look at the embargo dates) but it's no secret this has been coming for a while.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 10:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 10:54 pm
Posts: 46187
Full Member
 

😕


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 10:55 pm
Posts: 8354
Free Member
 

The push for bigger wheels is begining to make sense. Soon the cassette will be bigger than the rear wheel....

Surely if you need a 50 tooth cassette you maybe should be considering a front mech instead..


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:03 pm
Posts: 34568
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:05 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Part of me wonders if there was a shimano badge and it was 11-50 would it be a line to take the cash...


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

12 speeds? and a 10 tooth small sprocket? It looks like it'll wear out really quickly.

Won't matter so much anyway, the sorts of people who need these big expander cassettes must rarely ride their bikes anyway.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:12 pm
Posts: 44000
Full Member
 

In
Before
The
Thread
Deletion

😆


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:13 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

3/10 Dave, tbh it's not up to your usual standard


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:14 pm
Posts: 1248
Free Member
 

I'd quite happily have a bit more range since I've enjoyed the jump from 34 to 36 to 42 big cogs then I'm sure I'd like this.

Although it'll be both too expensive and too made by Sram for me to actually buy.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, it's obviously an inflammatory commment, but at the same time, I must have a point. A 50t cassette? Under what circumstances would you need one of those, unless you were seriously unfit? The 10t ones can't last long at all either. Or they never used to on BMXs.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:17 pm
Posts: 1754
Full Member
 

If this is correct then its a bit nuts!!!


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:17 pm
Posts: 1248
Free Member
 

You'd run a bigger chainring and get a higher top end, surely? Nothing to do with fitness


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And I only went 1 X11 last night..


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:18 pm
Posts: 44000
Full Member
 

And folk used to complain that geared hubs were putting all the weight in the wrong place on the bike.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You'd run a bigger chainring and get a higher top end, surely? Nothing to do with fitness

A higher top end for what?! Road riding? Or just run a normal chainring and spin a bit quicker?


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And folk used to complain that geared hubs were putting all the weight in the wrong place on the bike.

😀

This is a gradual shift though. 36/38/40/42/50. No one'll notice.

I remember when I used to ride....I had a 28t cassette. The biggest available was a touring cassette at 36t I think. It weighed loads.

It's a gradual shift towards a gear box/hub though. THat'll be the next "big" thing in mtbing I think.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:23 pm
Posts: 1428
Free Member
 

This makes no sense and will be really expensive. I still want it


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Haha glad I missed the 11 speed boat that is OLD news


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:25 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

And folk used to complain that geared hubs were putting all the weight in the wrong place on the bike.

Given that sram are able to make a cassette significantly lighter than the shimano offering the I doubt your actually getting to a serious weight there.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:32 pm
Posts: 34568
Full Member
 

Meh, I've just gone for a sunrace 11-42 10speed, cheaper than xt11speed , waaaay cheaper than SRAM and I still get to use shimano mechs I know won't start developing slop in all the pivots and clutch after a few weekends trips to the mountains ala SRAM


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:37 pm
Posts: 21027
 

I call shenanigans.

Why would they release the XO1 version before XX1? Why the '1' and not XO2 or XX2? Odd that the resolution isn't good enough to count the sprockets on the cassette. Looks like someone's added the word eagle and swapped a couple of 1s for 2s....


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I call shenanigans.

Shhh; you'll spoil a good argument 😉


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:43 pm
Posts: 1248
Free Member
 

I call shenanigans.

Good points. But then Sram has already crammed 4 groupsets into the space where Shimano has 2 so I'm not sure I really understand their logic at the best of times. Maybe XX1 will remain as the XC ultra-light group where X01 is more gnar/enduro.

No mention of a chain either which would be one of the more interesting parts.

And does 1 not stand for the single front ring?


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:53 pm
Posts: 2431
Full Member
 

30 - 50?

Still not as low as my 20 - 36! 😀

Shame it is made by SRAM. My recent experiences with their kit from a reliability and longevity point of view has been massively underwhelming. The last Sram cassette I used was fine right up until the point that I started snapping teeth off. The rear mech developed slop after a handful of rides. The press fit bottom bracket decided to fail in sympathy.The kit may be light but there is a definite trade off in reliability and longevity that I'm not willing to make.

I really am grumpy at times! 😆


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A reliable 9-42 cassette is all that is needed.


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 12:20 am
Posts: 15491
Full Member
 

I call shenanigans

Probably... But Googling a bit shows the old interwebz rumour mill is going...

[url] https://m.reddit.com/r/MTB/comments/41xt21/sneaky_sram_12_speed_1050_drivetrain [/url]

[url] http://www.thebikecomesfirst.com/possible-leaked-photos-of-new-sram-12-speed-eagle-drivetrain/ [/url]

Doesn't even appear to be leccy shifting either, these old fashioned Bowden cables really are Sooo 1890's...

I think the most disappointing aspect though (if true) is the ****y name... "Eagle" FFS, really?

I'm starting my own rumour now:

Campag to re-enter the MTB market with an all new 1x17 groupset. The entire group is assembled by hand from slivers of graphine by artisanal wizards and weighs just 397g (including cranks, hubs and cassette). There is no shifter, instead, customers are sent on a two week course where they learn to control the dérailleur with focused thought...
All 100% FACT!!


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 12:21 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

I thought the problem with the 9t was the chain went round a bit lumpy?

Shame it is made by SRAM. My recent experiences with their kit from a reliability and longevity point of view has been massively underwhelming.
Got over 2 years from my last x9 setup. Mech went sloppy but they all do that and it never impacted shifting, in the end I let the chain go on too long and decided to run the lot of it out and go to GX.
I heard there was some tooth snapping on some 11sp cassettes but they were being happily warrantied over here which suggests batch issues rather than inherent issues.
Can't comment on BB's as I've only used hope for the last 7/8 years I reckon.


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 12:26 am
Posts: 15491
Full Member
 

I thought the problem with the 9t was the chain went round a bit lumpy?

Nah shimano did it ages ago, just never bothered to put it on an MTB... [url= http://www.sheldonbrown.com/capreo.html ]See[/url]


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 12:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Official announcement tomorrow then? 😉

Interesting that One-Up got their 50T 'shark' ring out 1 week prior 🙂


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:09 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

I'm a reasonably fit forty-two years old and I've recently gone 1x10 with 32T front and a 11-42 Sunrace cassette.

I took it out on my local trails for the first time on Sunday, by the time I got home I was so knackered that I fell asleep in the post-ride bath.

I'd be quite happy with an 11-46 cassette...


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How are you guys finding the sunrace cassette? I'm thinking of going for the 40t with an SLX mech. Any issues with shifting of even getting on to the big ring?


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:49 pm
Posts: 8913
Full Member
 

I'd be quite happy with an 11-46 cassette...

How about a 10-42 with a 30 up front, almost the same. Or just go for a 30 up front with what you have if your crank will take it and put up with the loss of a gear at the other end.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 12:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about a 10-42 with a 30 up front

this, I'm a reasonably fit 57 year old


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:15 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Official announcement tomorrow then?

or maybe later today 😉


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:21 pm
Posts: 58
Free Member
 

As above, I'm fitting a 30t chainring to go with the 10-42 on my 29er. The 32t just tires me out on longer steeper climbs.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 1:22 pm
Posts: 2599
Free Member
 

It should come out later today. Sram is American and that's their biggest market. I expect it'll be around midday US time.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 2:03 pm
Posts: 15
Full Member
 

I heard (from someone who works with SRAM) the announcement is tomorrow at 3pm.


 
Posted : 23/03/2016 2:30 pm
Posts: 2599
Free Member
 

[url= http://singletrackworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/sram-launches-new-xx1-xo1-eagle-drivetrains/ ]There we go! Launch article on the front page.[/url]
A mate at the LBS didn't believe me.

Eagle Crankset: XX1 – £356.00 // XO1 – £328.00

Eagle Rear Mech: XX1 – £234.00 // XO1 – £185.00

Eagle Trigger Shifter: XX1 – £131.00 // XO1 – £112.00

Eagle Cassette: XG-1299 – £353.00 // XG-1295 – £302.00

Eagle Chain: £50.00 – £71.00

X-Sync Chainring: £79.00

XX1 Complete Group: £1,173.00

XO1 Complete Group: £1,005.00


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 3:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

£50 chain! ouch


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 3:33 pm
Posts: 2599
Free Member
 

Yeah, those consumables are expensive.. £50 chain, £79 chainring & £302 cassette, that's £431! That said, there's always healthy discounts available.


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 3:38 pm
Posts: 41933
Free Member
 

Yeah, those consumables are expensive.. £50 chain, £79 chainring & £302 cassette, that's £431! That said, there's always healthy discounts available.

Yea, the XT branded version with slightly less range and a £50 cassette :-p

Stollen from the [i]Ask Chips a question[/i] thread:

"In a choice between Shimano and SRAM which groupset would you go for, XT or XTR?"

I know that to an extent the explosion in cycling and MTB's popularity over the last 15 years has lead to more 'aspirational' brands and pricing att he top end (the fact hat a Thompson elite stem/seatpost is now decidedly mid range says it all). And that the lower and mid range stuff is far better than is used to be (I happily ran X5 on my last bike, 15 yeas ago it was XT or nothing). But it's getting daft.


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 3:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm relieved to read others have found SRAM pivots go sloppy in no time. I did fear it might be the lower end components I was using!

2 or 3x9 is where it's at.


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 4:00 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

Pah, just back from a quick spin on my 1x9 setup. I'm holding out for 1x13


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 4:24 pm
Page 1 / 2