Forum menu
Slackset on 1 and 1...
 

[Closed] Slackset on 1 and 1/8th headtube?

Posts: 1305
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3866158]

Is there any point?
I have a FS bike with a 68deg unsagged head angle. I'd like it to be slacker really but don't want/can't afford longer forks.
On one sell these slacksets that supposedly take the head angle out by 1 degree.
The head tube is 120mm long and standard 1.125, so they have one that fits, but will it make a noticeable difference to the head angle? I suspect not, has anyone fitted one to a similar frame and noticed a difference when riding?


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:01 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What a stupid question


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm kind of with GW on this one. It'll make a one(-ish) degree difference, which is a difference. Whether you'll feel it or not is another matter. I assume when you say you want to make it slacker, you mean slacker by more than 1 degree?

Increasing fork length by 20mm, which I'd guess is round about the biggest jump you could make, will also give roughly 1 degree. The difference between the two methods is that the headset will marginally lower you BB and the longer forks will raise it.


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You could combine the headset with offset shock bushes to increase the amount of slackness...


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:41 am
Posts: 1305
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers for that warpcow, I guess the reason I asked was cos I couldn't see the point of these slacksets anyway, maybe if you have a short fat headtube and can change the angle by 2 degrees or more it might be worth it.
I wonder if they have actually sold any for standard head tubes?
And GW thanks again for your as ever charming and helpful response. you really are a delightful human being. ๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My mate fitted one to his bike, taking it from about 68 down to around 67. He has a set of offset bushings ordered to, but reckoned the Slackset made a noticeable difference to the ride so far.


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:48 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm peckish, I'd like a biscuit, there are biscuits in my cupboard. But is there any point?

I know, I'll ask on STW ๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:51 am
 sv
Posts: 2815
Free Member
 

I know, I'll ask on STW

Depends if they are chocolate or plain?


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 10:01 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Got both, which would you prefer I have sv?


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 10:07 am
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

As you've dared ask a question about MTBs on an MTB website, there are also other headset options-

[url] http://www.workscomponents.co.uk/index.asp [/url]


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 10:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

have a works components one on my rigid hummer does feel quite different


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 10:10 am
Posts: 1305
Free Member
Topic starter
 

cheers for that link scruff, very helpful


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 10:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think I'm correct in saying that the On One headset is just a rebranded Works one(?). There's also an Israeli guy who can custom-make them for about the same price (might be able to eke out a slightly bigger change), but I forget his name. He's on mtbr a lot.


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 11:03 am
Posts: 1305
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hmm I bought a rear mech hanger from an israeli off ebay a few years ago I guess its probably him.


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 11:10 am
Posts: 3722
Free Member
 

I'd wager it will make a noticeable difference.


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 11:13 am
 edd
Posts: 1390
Full Member
 

I have a 1 degree Works Components on my hardtail (traditional 1 1/8"). Makes a difference IMO.
[url] http://www.workscomponents.co.uk/works-components---10-degree-ec34---traditional-1-18-fitment-6-p.asp [/url]


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 11:19 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

The way we write "On-One Slackset by Works Components" is a bit of a giveaway.

http://www.on-one.co.uk/i/q/HSWCSLS/on_one_slackset_headset_by_works_components_for_carbon_456


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 11:50 am