Forum menu
Show me pics of you...
 

[Closed] Show me pics of your XC race bikes and give me your suggestions

 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

Aha! We'll have you next year 😉

You mean flat tyres? Yes, can be an issue. Eventually had one at 24/12 which was dispiriting. owever Ihave been using caffelatex sealant since then and none since.


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 7:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nah, were winning it this year... 😯

Not. 😆


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 7:50 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

bloody dougal and his mate was in the pairs race and did more laps than us 😯
git. 😆


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 8:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This is what I'm using this year. Set of Stans instead of the carbon rims though. Weight, 18lbs with my Crank Brothers Pedals on. Obviously cost a pretty penny but they do much more reasonable priced ones...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Have they stopped them snapping constantly!? It'd better weigh 18lbs for £6300! The demo bike I weighed last year was a whole lot heavier than that, despite MSCs claims! At least you have a constant supply of frames for when yours snaps!

Sam, do you think it's the fact they're carbon that makes them feel better, or the tubs, or the weight?

You could spend less on a lighter clincher set up, which I'd expect would be better for most, more versatile certainly!


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 8:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just keep the receipt from the MSC- other than MSC's snapping a lot, that is a [i]Lovely[/i] bike


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 8:49 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

is that how much it is? fek. 😯
it is nice though.


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 8:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Here's mine (not that I'll actually be racing!) - just ordered a set of American Classic wheels for it. Gone back to risers since this pic though.

I've got a set of SID Race forks for it as well, but having run it with both I prefer the Float 80RLT's even if they're a bit heavier.


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 9:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

epicsteve

Is that a Zion? I was thinking of swapping my Stumper HT frame for one of those. I guess it's a nice ride is it?

Cheers


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For what it's worth, GO TITANIUM, IMHO Carbon is for Road bikes - It doesn't like being crashed, You WILL crash. If you're looking for a bike that will last, it's your best option. Doesn't have to be US made!!


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 9:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is that a Zion? I was thinking of swapping my Stumper HT frame for one of those. I guess it's a nice ride is it?

It is indeed a Zion. I've had a few months and am still working out the best set-up for me (80 or 100mm forks, flats or risers etc) but have been impressed by it so far. I've no other Ti frames to compare it with but it's noticeably comfier than the Dave Hinde M3 frame I also have (which also a bit lighter than the Zion).


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 10:00 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

With Brant's new carbon Carnegie's bars, Stans new crest rims on American classic hubs from JRA and weighs in a fraction over 20lbs.

It's great for up to 3 hours unless it's a smoothish trail then it can go all day.


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 10:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Johnclimber - i salute you. What a ****ing gorgeous bike that niner is 😀


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 10:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

my hardtail ..
[IMG] [/IMG]

and my new full sus ....
[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 10:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Johnclimber - i salute you. What a **** gorgeous bike that niner is

Not to my eyes I'm afraid, although usually I find niners the best looking (which isn't necessarily saying much!) of 29ers. Partially I think it's the colour, but also something about the relationship of saddle and bar height seems to make it look like the frame is too big for that rider.


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

relationship of saddle and bar height seems to make it look like the frame is too big for that rider.

I realised the saddle needed raising a bit after I sat back on it after this shot, the seat clamp wasn't tight enough and it had slide down a little 😳


 
Posted : 17/02/2010 10:43 pm
 Duc
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Probably the weight of that saddle bag that made it go down - How do you fill it ? 😀

Incidentally, are those Carnegies on there at the moment ?


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 7:38 am
Posts: 54
Free Member
 

Any excuse to show the old bird:

[img] [/img]

In Sweden I am just about the only guy on the start line riding a FS setup and I do it for the exact reason njee20 wrote before, I can just sit down and peddle. Off road I am racing the 1 hour + lap XC series and some marathon events.

May be her last year with me racing mind as I am being seriously tempted onto a Superfly 100, if only the frame prices would come down :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 8:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

When it was brand new

Thinking about some new forks at some point...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 9:22 am
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

njee20
Leighton Buzzard or Woburn.
TBH that's my only MTB, if I was only racing it I'd do more to it. Hoping to do well on it in the Grande Vets at this years FNSS.
But cross and road is my main thing.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 9:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee20 & cullen-bay:: I've certainly seen/heard of some MSCs snapping. I wouldn't say a lot though and mainly the full sus.

For the record, I rode/raced last years bike hard tail with full XTR and never had any issues.

I ride for their UK team so £6,300 isn't what I paid but I never said it was cheap!

On the weight front, 18lb IS the weight on my scales (at the moment).

I admit, the tyres are not usuable in this country, the term "semi slick" would be generous.

Having said that, I've only got MSCs 355 wheelset on it at the moment because I've got Stans to go on. This in weight terms will balance out usable tyres so I would still expect the weight to be in this area.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 9:35 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

So you've got the Maxxlite 285s on it?

My eBay special with Mud-Xs is 20. So you've got 530g on tyres, yours has XX, and a SID WC fork.

I'll wager if I spent another £4000 I could get mine lighter 😉

That's rubbish about there not being a problem with them snapping and you know it! 2 at Dalby, Paul Robertson's Koncept and I've heard of various other problems. I really want to like them, but they're not tough enough considering the amount of cash you have to lay down!

I'll have a Flash Team if I'm spending that sort of money!


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 10:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bream, excellent choice sir!!

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 10:45 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

are most folks running 355s these days?
i am on standard race (not 7000) and find them a bit bendy in the corners.
still true and doing the job mind you just a bit noodly.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 10:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee20, yeah the tyres are insane, although I used them at sherwood last year! Probably shouldn't of, but they got me round quickly! 😉

I didn't say there wasn't any problems, I said I had no issues with my bike last year. Just because I ride for them doesn't mean I'm going to defend them to the death. I can only account for my own bike and honestly it's the best mtb I've ever ridden.

Paul has had a few issues with his bike but it is a full sus and you always have a load more issues with them than HTs. In my opinion they've made the FS too light and are bound to have problems.

A couple of the bikes from last year where considered pre production and I remember there was a problem with a batch of swing arms. I know some bolts have snapped as well but this isn't really the frame.

It seems like your opinion is being coloured by the FS and not the HT.

I'd probably agree with you on the Flash, it's a stunner aint it!


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 10:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nonk, I'm on the race 7000s and I've found them great. I think from a durability POV, the 355s are a better option in the long run.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 10:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My weapon of choice, and yes i know it really shouldn't have gears on it 😉

[img] [/img]

Its not light but then neither am i 🙄 .

I just hope its as quick with me on it as it was last year when Sam rode it (not a chance 😳 )


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:03 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Actually Paul's was the only FS I was aware of breaking, it was generally the hardtails, as I've heard they've made them so stiff that the seat stays just snap rather than flexing!

I think the Hope Hoops with 355s offer such good value for money too, it's brought Stan's rims to the masses as it were!

I want to get some Podium MMX wheels for the Fuel, but whether I'll get round to it before splurging on something else is another matter!

Sherwood's the place for the Maxxlites, it's about the one course I use Furious Freds! You just need to learn to stay upright Giles, was it Crow and Margam you ended up on the floor in the first half a mile 🙂


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Haha actually it was both Crow & Margam... Made up for it at Plymouth though! I do need to ride my mtb more often, my technical ability is shocking...

I didn't realise there were many HTs in the country as I'm the only one on the team with one and there is a demo bike which was pre production and snapped. I'm quoting the rep now but this years frames have had the angle of the brake mount increased in a effort to push the shock through the bottom stays rather than the seat stays. So if nothing else, they are trying.

I want the podiums MXX too but they only do them as a wheelset and I'd prefer to use the same hubs for my race wheelsets so it makes them easier to switch in and out...


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:14 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Nah you can get the rims from JRA and various places in Europe, they're pretty cheap from JRA, far less than the Race 7000s.

Plymouth was a good result certainly, bet that annoyed Sion, he never did win one!


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mmmm, OK the talk of 285g tyres whetted my appetite, I am always looking for something to give me the edge on the race to the chip shop.

I don't think I will bother posting images of my porky old Scandal on this one its got pretty serious racer.

Suffice to say I have raced every bike ive owned, wether it was always suitable for what I was doing is debatatable but when all said and done, its still the bloke on it that makes the difference.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:22 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

The Maxxlite 285s are unbelievably expensive, I forget how much, but it's over £100 each. Furious Freds are only 10g more and much more 'sensible' for a crazy fast tyre with no grip!


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought the furious fred was about the same as a Twister Supersonic at 340g?

I wont be buying any 285's anytime soon!!


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

JRA state on their website they are only available as a wheelset (unless that's changed in the last week). I also asked the question directly to JRA with the same response, strange. I'll have to investigate, where in europe?

Yeah, I wouldn't of been happy if I was Sion!


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:27 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Google them, Starbike do, I think Action Sports do and various other German outlets, some of them have some really cheap wheelsets, €500 with 'Fun Works' hubs and €800 with DT 190s!

JRA certainly imply they can get them [url= http://www.justridingalong.com/shop.php?product=4295 ]here[/url], but I asked Jon and got the same reply as you.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:33 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

you could put em on wtb laser light hubs from crc ( same as american classic)
i got a pair for 75 quid but i see that they are now 90 ish.
still cheap though.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm racing on ZTR Archs and find them fine :æ)


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:41 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

They're not quite the same as AMC, they're heavier, 145/265 vs 130/225. I'd rather have AMCs on Olympics and have the tougher rim.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 11:44 am
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

i had spotted that but at 75 shecklles i had to bite. 😉


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 12:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

[i]The Lactic acid inducing racing machine
[/i]

a mars bar short of 30lb


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 1:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Spock, is that a mahoosive 'ding' in your downtube? 😮


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 1:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Spock, is that a mahoosive 'ding' in your downtube?

Yes, i hadn't really thought about that before.


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 1:24 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Freds are 295g-300g on our scales. They're awesome as long as you use Stans - I wouldn't like to run them with tubes. I also have some Maxxlites, which are very narrow in comparison. In terms of useability, the Freds are a lot better - especially if you go with the UST version (400g) as it has tougher sidewalls.

Very nice bike Giles. Very light 🙂 TBH the only dodgy bit is your choice of pedals... Or have you found a way of stopping them falling to bits?

GB


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 1:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had a second hand pair last year and I wasn't really impressed with the pedals from a durability POV. I bought new ones this year and they feel much better but who knows how long they will last.

Are you on a new bike this year?


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 1:41 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

I'm sure I've seen a cheaper alternative to Schwalbes FFs, also made by Schwalbe just can't think what they're called 😳


 
Posted : 18/02/2010 1:57 pm
Page 2 / 3