Forum menu
Shimano MW80s £96.....
 

[Closed] Shimano MW80s £96.....quite a few going!

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've just purchased a pair, there's quite a few left.

This seller has NOTHING to do with me, just passing on the option.

Oooooow, I hope they fit *worried, yet excited*

ebay...


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 1:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyone any thoughts on Shimano MW80 sizing?

I have a pair of Shimano summery SPD shoes (M122 I think) which fit nicely with one pair of socks on, but are a wee bit tight with sealskinz on too. Do I need to go one size higher with MW80s?


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

From what I've gleemed from others on here, you need to jump up at least one size.


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 1:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wear Shimano MP66 45's and bought the MW80 46 and they're too big.


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I went up one size, compared to my shimano M122 SPD.

I wear Shimano MP66 45's and bought the MW80 46 and they're too big.

Thats cos the MP66 are trainer style, the 'up one size' is a guide compared to 'race' style SPD's


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 2:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BTW for me the seller has been great and very helpful.


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 2:25 pm
Posts: 3775
Free Member
 

yep I would say go up a size IF you have anything other than narrow feet
For me it wasnt the length so much as the width (ffnnarr)
- I mean of the shoe obviously


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yep I would say go up a size IF you have anything other than narrow feet
For me it wasnt the length so much as the width (ffnnarr)
- I mean of the shoe obviously

You know what they say... big feet, big socks.

Thanks for the advice folks. Will maybe have a word with the birthday present fairy.


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find Shimano sizing is spot on.


 
Posted : 18/11/2010 3:13 pm
 gamo
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Bought a pair yesterday morning and they were delivered first thing this morning! great ebay seller.


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 2:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I normally take a UK 10½ - 11 in pretty much everything
I needed a 48 in MW80s to allow for an extra pair of socks


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 2:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bought a pair yesterday morning and they were delivered first thing this morning! great ebay seller.

Me too.


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 3:16 pm
Posts: 4278
Full Member
 

I have tried a few shimano shoes. I take a size 8 in most traiers, occasionally a 7. 7 1/2 in smart shoes. Slightly narow feet.

MT21 (8/42) = spot on
MW80 (8/42) = much too small
MW80 (9/43) = ?
MT90 (8/42) = slightly too small
MT91 (9/43) = too big

Specialized Defroster (8/42) = spot on

Lake MXZ302 (8/42) = good but wide ankle

Scott disco slippers (7/41) = slightly too small

HTH someone as a basis for comparison!!


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 3:21 pm
 gamo
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Im a 10 1/2 in shoes 46 in most shimano shoes but recently mw 80's
included needed a 47, feet must be getting bigger as i age or change
in sizing!


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 4:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

pixelmix - Member
Anyone any thoughts on Shimano MW80 sizing?

I'll say small. I usually take size 44 in cycling shoes, including the Shimano MT30's that I have got, but went for a size 46 in the MW80's, and even then I feel they're rather snug - no room for thick Sealskinz, but hopefully in the depths of winter I won't need Sealskinz anyway.


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

why would you want sealskinz when MW80 are goretex - are they not?


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 5:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

why would you want sealskinz when MW80 are goretex - are they not?

True, but then I've never found clothing that claims to be waterproof to really be 100% waterproof. Waterproof socks under waterproof shoes can't do any harm.


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 29
Free Member
 

cos sealskinz have merino in em...


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 5:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

why would you want sealskinz when MW80 are goretex - are they not?

My feet got wet in them last week
Probably leaked over the top though


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 5:33 pm
 dobo
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

they are fairly waterproof if you stand in a puddle but if you think your feet will be dry if you go out riding in the rain think again! just like every other boot the water will just run down your leg/lycra and soak your feet. sure they will still be warmer.
I really like mine though, 2nd winter on.
dont event get me started on my non waterproof event jacket. basically i've found nothing bike related to be truly waterproof.


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 7:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stif currently have these for £110 as well. Not quite as good a deal obviously, just thought I'd say.

http://www.stif.co.uk/mtb/product/shimano-mw80-gore-tex-spd-winter-boots/9157


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find shimano shoes to be spot on sizewise.

The shimano mt90 winter boots i have were bought one size bigger and i manage to fit in an extra pair of insoles and thick merino socks with a nice amount of space left to stop the chill setting in.
This just shows how big they are when i move up a size.They were bought big to get extra insoles in on purpose! They are the best shoes ive had in winter and were used at least once a week over last years bad winter in the snow. so warm but i have to admit they did chill a bit around -7c and below. Thats not anything to complain about though.


 
Posted : 19/11/2010 9:31 pm
 gamo
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Out this morning in absolute filth and rain and came home
with warm dry feet:)


 
Posted : 21/11/2010 1:37 pm