Forum menu
I can't find the link, but read an article about 6 months ago from Andy McKenna about mountain bikers not respecting the land...struck a chord as it did ring true.
Anyway, this thread and posts have reminded me of it and just highlights even on a designated bike trail, mountain bikers can't stick to the designated route and argue that it is OK...
Almost had a bit of an off yesterday at Glentress.
I was well within control hence the reason I stopped.
So which one was it?
TJ - on what may seem a technicality - the qualifier in the access legislation is “responsible” not “reasonable”... you might want to work out the difference before pursuing your hypothetical court case.
I sometimes attach a tube to the bottom of the down tube (weight distribution is better, obvs). Do I get to be miss the point too?
"99% sure that there is a ‘No Entry’ sign at the bottom of ‘Carl’s Lane’, where it joins the access track to Spooky Wood."
I think there is but I'm pretty sure there isn't one at the unofficial cut-through where people ride off Carl's Lane to go up the old entrance to the Boundary.
<div class="bbp-reply-content">
TJ – on what may seem a technicality – the qualifier in the access legislation is “responsible” not “reasonable”… you might want to work out the difference before pursuing your hypothetical court case.
</div>
Oops - you are right and there is a difference. Warra numpty I am 😉