Forum menu
Olympic Mountain Bi...
 

[Closed] Olympic Mountain Bike Course - Discuss

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2594736]

[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-12849100 ]Olympic Course[/url]

Discuss


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

er... it goes round in a loop, it looks alright - probably more technical than some courses. Fit for purpose, I reckon.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think people who havn't ridden it will pan it becuase it a) looks a bit like a motorway before its bedded in, and b) there is no wikkid sick 1000ft drop to the death included.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mtb races on tv always looks lame - even the tougher DH courses.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:20 pm
Posts: 2262
Full Member
 

A slight slope described as a 'daunting obstacle' ?? WTF??


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:23 pm
Posts: 2687
Free Member
 

certainly looks tame to me

I would have voted for HTN 2 hour course as a less expensive and more betterized alternative

I'm sure Terrahawk would have given his approval for half the budget that this course cost.

Thast said I'm not sure why XC is an olympic sport anyway. It seems a mile away from the pass time I enjoy


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you can hang while you hurtle down this drop, you deserve to be an olympic contender!

Well hell, where do I get my team kit?


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thast said I'm not sure why XC is an olympic sport anyway. It seems a mile away from the pass time I enjoy

That's because you don't race XC - you ride your bike.

It's a bit like someone who commutes on their road bike saying that the road race is nothing like what they do on a bike.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I could be a contender!


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Given the flatness of the region I reckon they've done a good job, and its a new venue that will continue afterwards as a legacy. One of the big issues was the ability to televise the event, and this is extremely good on that basis due to the lack of trees.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:29 pm
Posts: 16173
Free Member
 

It is just me or have they just shoved a load of hard core down on a field and got a big roller out to make it bowling green smooth?

Why couldnt they use natural terrain etc, or is it because there is a lack of it in the area?

Some lucky person got the opportunity to ride round it yesterday didnt they for STW... or was it today?

Still at least in the future it will make a nice track to push my granny round in her wheel chair.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Has the track been armoured or is that the natural sub soil ?


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks promising.

Some pics [url= http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/news/article/london-2012-olympic-mountain-bike-course-first-impressions-29660 ]here[/url], let's wait and see what mboy thinks.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would have voted for HTN 2 hour course as a less expensive and more betterized alternative

Except it's nowhere near London ๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Comments from people who've actually ridden it seem fairly positive...

http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/news/article/london-2012-olympic-mountain-bike-course-first-impressions-29660


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:39 pm
Posts: 4178
Full Member
 

Until the singletrack report is up there are a load of photos here;

http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/london-2012-olympic-mountain-bike-course-first-impressions-29660

Looks great to me but i'm not a Mail reading, everything-is-shit, why-am-I-paying-for-this miserable sod and I can grasp why the London olympics can't be held in Wales.

EDIT; OK, link posted by two other people while I wrote that!


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ill speaks to kenta and see how he thinks it rode but it looks pretty good,and techy in places.
Anyone can ride the sections once slowly when your not out of breath...but try it on the 6th lap after 1hr45 at 90percent of max heart rate on a 100mm hardtail with 2.1 tyres.
thats the difference between you and absalon
Bruce


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Torminalis - Member
If you can hang while you hurtle down this drop, you deserve to be an olympic contender!
Well hell, where do I get my team kit?

I'll need a small size please,
do I have to provide my own bike, or do I get a team issue bike??


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nah, the STW-heroes could easily beat him down all the technical stuff, even on a rigid hardtail with road tyres.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

Nah, the STW-heroes could easily beat him down all the technical stuff, even on a [s]rigid hardtail[/s]29er with road tyres

fixed that for ya clubber ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for clubber. it surprises me that the olympic committee didn't consult with the stw massive prior to building this. obviously the folk on here would pee all over dobbers like absalon wiht the power of opinion alone


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Living in the north I want to hate it because there's so much natural stuff up here that would be better... but Manchester didn't get the Olympics that London did, so looking at that report it doesn't look too bad at all.

Yeah we could all ride it piss easy, but on a race day i'm sure that the terrain isn't going to matter as much as the pace.

Real question is... why aren't DH and 4X Olympic events yet?


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

MMMMMM , not sure ๐Ÿ˜• The pics make it look like a huge bmx track with a couple of rock gardens in although the wide openess of it will make it very tv/spectator friendly I suppose.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:54 pm
Posts: 1635
Free Member
 

Hi-5 fellow Olympian contenders! FFS! *why why why why why* (yeah, London, I know...)


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ohh to the power of words,niche and baggies ...ha


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:58 pm
Posts: 2687
Free Member
 

Except it's nowhere near London

is this course near london? I don't think I'd like to walk it.

Many of the sports featured in the olympics are nowhere near the host city

๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Name them then...

I'll give the two I know of:

Rowing (Eton/Windsor rowing lake, about 1hr drive from the main Olympic area)

Sailing (Weymouth and Portland, er not actually sure how long it takes)

EDIT: football events are dotted round the country too.
http://www.london2012.com/map.php

3 sports = many? Not in my book.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 5:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's a field with a track in it. The whole Olympic thing bugs me anyway developing a small part of a country, which will in five years after the event need a further injection of cash to maintain the stadiums and wider facilities. It is unlikely to get any cash from central government and certainly not the local government and local community therefore they will be left to fall into disrepair and the cycle will continue, not very sustainable is it. Sure have the big main stadiums close together but why all of them in a village situation?. Yes it benefits the media and teams but to be honest i'm sure each element of a team will have their own individual managers and physios etc so shouldn't really matter. To me the olympics should be about show casing a country to the world not just a small run down bit of it. Why make a new course when Dalby is better, and already exists? or others like it. Have the shooting in some part of rural Cornwall, boost the tourism in that area. The kayak could be on a real river which could be adopted for the event. We have a fantastic and diverse country and it seems such a shame that the world are only able to see a small less impressive part of it. The money won't be spread evenly around the country regardless of teams staying in different locations, the hotel owners may benefit but i doubt that will pass on to the local communities.

Just my 2pence worth. (and no am not spending a small fortune to get to the olympics, Trains, hotels, hyped up food prices, silly priced entry into the events) count me out unless I get a freebie lol


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

With all the talk about Legacy for the venues after the games are over it doesn't look like something I'd drive miles to ride. Perhaps the images are deceptive and it's more interesting than it looks. However judging by what i've seen and read here and on other pages it'll a make for fast times if uninteresting telly, and b; it'll be easy to remove with a grader a week after the games close. Shame really.
Dalby was far better but too far from 'Laundin' for the sponsors to be interested in.
A bit of a missed opportunity.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 2687
Free Member
 

previous cities ๐Ÿ™‚

There appear to be more citys in the world that have hosted the olympic thasn that there famous london


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:07 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

Living in the north I want to hate it because there's so much natural stuff up here that would be better... but Manchester didn't get the Olympics that London did, so looking at that report it doesn't look too bad at all.

obviously the farce around the bridleways at Rivington passed you by in the build up to the Commonwealth Games

ever wondered why the course didn't go up to the top of the hill? ask the horseriders..


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shh... don't tell anyone ๐Ÿ˜‰

I didn't think that was the case though - off to do a TJ wiki check...


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:08 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

Nah, the STW-heroes could easily beat him down all the technical stuff, even on a rigid hardtail29er with road tyres

fixed that for ya clubber

ermm a 29er would make it easier, surely the STW massive want to show how gnarr they are in which case something like an azonic with 10" of travel and a fat boy with full body armor would be more appropriate for beating these wussy xc jeycore types ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is the lord being serious when he looks at that view and says that he can't think of a better backdrop for the event...?


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:13 pm
Posts: 5185
Full Member
 

A decent XC course should have some wide bits in a few places around to allow overtaking - a 100% singletrack one can be a procession. Technical bits look pretty good from the bikeradar photos too.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:16 pm
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

would have voted for HTN 2 hour course

I know we lament the Essex course, but wasn't HTN intended to be ridden on CX bikes? Can't have been that technical?


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

but wasn't HTN intended to be ridden on CX bikes?

Anyone ridden any XC race courses in the UK that would prove tricky on a CX bike?


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:24 pm
Posts: 25940
Full Member
 

looks "OK"

However ( ๐Ÿ˜‰ )

seems ludicrous to me that the olympics should have to centre on a specific city in the 1st place. If IOC was remotely interested in legacy/(re)generation etc they'd insist that sports were distributed far more widely and facilities built somewhere meaningful and guaranteed to be permanent after the event


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:28 pm
Posts: 436
Full Member
 

Are the olympics anything to do with sport anymore or just a way to generate money


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks great to me. A XC course that has to deliver on a set day - whatever the weather is like on the day itself or has been over the preceding weeks. Also has to be able to cope with a large field. I'm looking forward to it!


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its not set in stone that it will remain after the games, should look a whole lot better once all the other infastructure is in place around it.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:43 pm
Posts: 1178
Full Member
 

Some people seem to be confusing being able to ride the course with being able to race it quickly, on an xc bike with a heart rate above 90% of max.

Not having huge extended hills will make it better to watch. If the course is too selective it will just be a procession after a couple of laps.

This is a one-off chance to have a world level race venue built in the south east, an area of the country lacking in top quality natural riding. It might not be worth diving hours to ride it, but its only an hour away from central london so it could provide a great local venue for a huge number of people.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks great to me. A XC course that has to deliver on a set day - whatever the weather is like on the day itself or has been over the preceding weeks

Agree with above. Looks miles better than some recent World Cup courses, e.g. Champery. They could keep it for racing after the Olympics if it's required. Dalby would have been good I guess but maybe it is too far away from the main event.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:50 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50602
 

It'll serve the purpose it was built for I reckon.

I'm surprised more people on here don't like it, seems to be what many drive out at the weekends after posting on here to see what the conditions are, what tyres they'll need and if body armour is needed.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 6:51 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12651
Free Member
 

Yeah we could all ride it piss easy, but on a race day i'm sure that the terrain isn't going to matter as much as the pace.

Errr, no you couldn't. There's a couple of the sections involve significant drops if you take the hardest (and fastest) line. Not beyond many, but certainly well above average skill level required to ride the entire course. And then there's the rock garden climb, which you have zero momentum going into. It's an arse I can tell you!

It'll serve the purpose it was built for I reckon.

Precisely my thoughts having ridden it. It's pretty far from my favourite trail ever ridden, but then it's not designed to be nice in any way. It's designed for a purpose, to be a bit of a bugger when the riders are tired. You CAN NOT relax on this course, trust me, and I was going about 1/2 the pace (if I'm lucky) that the Olympic riders will ride it. Relax on it, and it'll have you off. The motorway wide sections in parts are mainly to make sure there's ample overtaking room, but they're not long and they go by quickly.


 
Posted : 24/03/2011 7:09 pm
Page 1 / 4