Forum menu
Oh God - go on then...
 

[Closed] Oh God - go on then - lets see some Singular swifts :oD

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2378592]

Next project.
Lets see some pics of builds for ideas etc, pref SS.
Thanks

.....waiting
.....waiting

๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 12:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not SS ๐Ÿ˜‰

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 8:00 am
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

SS with manitous
[url= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2523/4105087893_cb1cd77888_b.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2523/4105087893_cb1cd77888_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/rocketdog/4105087893/ ]before[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/rocketdog/ ]rOcKeTdOgUk[/url], on Flickr

SS rigid
[url= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4017/4632946744_f1b4415937_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4017/4632946744_f1b4415937_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/rocketdog/4632946744/ ]365/143 23/5/10[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/rocketdog/ ]rOcKeTdOgUk[/url], on Flickr

SS Mav SC32
[url= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4102/4743800172_8a9f422514_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4102/4743800172_8a9f422514_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/rocketdog/4743800172/ ]365/179 28/6/10[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/rocketdog/ ]rOcKeTdOgUk[/url], on Flickr

1 x 9
[url= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5090/5356902541_2d263931ee_b.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5090/5356902541_2d263931ee_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/rocketdog/5356902541/ ]damp[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/rocketdog/ ]rOcKeTdOgUk[/url], on Flickr

3 x 9
[url= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4066/4544117080_86b65766c2_o.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4066/4544117080_86b65766c2_o.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/rocketdog/4544117080/ ]hanging around[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/rocketdog/ ]rOcKeTdOgUk[/url], on Flickr

had enough yet?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:05 am
 jfeb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A Gryphon rather than a Swift, but as no one ever says "lets see photos of a Singular Gryphon"...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

Appologies for the state of my garden, front brake hose and steerer tube.

RocketDog - what length are those minutes? What do you think of them?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:13 am
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

120mm.....and i now have Mav SC32 and the minutes are in the garage, great forks, really light but need a frame designed for the longer travel really, 80 or 100mm minutes would work a treat though


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thought they looked a bit long! Can't you drop them internally to 100mm?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:23 am
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

not sure,any ideas? usually reducing the travel doesn't reduce the axel-crown length, just how far the forks compress, which wouldn't solve the length issues


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hmm lovin' this thread, a rigid Alfine Swift is the +1 in the standard n+1 equation for how many bikes do I need


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:32 am
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

big bike
big bloke
big ben (nevis)

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rOcKeTdOg - Member
not sure,any ideas? usually reducing the travel doesn't reduce the axel-crown length, just how far the forks compress, which wouldn't solve the length issues

Yes it does! I can't think of a fork that shortens travel without reducing the a-c length (though no doubt there is one!) You can reduce the travel on just about any air fork simply by increasing the length of the top out bumper even on forks that aren't designed to be travel adjustable.


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 9:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rocket Dog - When I drop travel on my old vanillas (add a spacer) from 130 to 100 the a-c gets 30mm shorter and when I raised the Wife's Rebas (remove a spacer) from 100 to 120 the a-c got 20mm bigger. I assume manitou work the same?

EDIT: A quick trawl of the interweb indicates that it isn't a trivial task. Not entirely sure why, but something to do with them not having the length of stroke determined solely by spacers.


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

big bike
[b]big bloke[/b]
big ben (nevis)

Yet not as big as I'd assumed...


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That bike is probably a 22" frame or something... you need to see a pic of Ton in a group of IT XC whippets and then you'll see differently!


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TT not long enough clubber?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

? eh?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oh, seatpost/saddle position, you mean?

25" TT is fine - I've just always liked the saddle a fair way back behind the BB


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ah fair enough, that's how I like it but yours does look quite extreme, your forks look like Reba, what happened to the Suntour?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Found a well priced reba on the classifieds. Sold the Epicon. TBH the Reba isn't really any better though. It does look nice in white though ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fair bit lighter surely?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't think so - the Epicon wasn't heavy.


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the Epicon wasn't heavy.

1850g ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 10:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

29er Rebas are 1.7/1.8kg ish IIRC

and IIRC the Epicon is quoted with the 15mm axle included


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 11:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

singular plus alfine


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 11:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Currently in bits in the garage but it is now set up with a 1x9 drivetrain, different saddle (the Brooks was just getting trashed) and Mary bars. Needs some better brakes as well.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 11:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's up to 150g difference godammit, every gram counts for those vital seconds etc. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Given the extra weight of the frame, forks and wheels I'm surprised 29ers have taken off with the (albeit mainly USA) pros.

I must try one out one day.


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 11:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you want to borrow mine, you're welcome - just let me know.

The lightest 29ers now seem to be getting pretty damn light - supposedly they're being built with lighter components than you can get away with on a 26" bike because they roll over stuff better and hence stress the components less though I'll admit to being sceptical on that to some extent since that was always touted on FS and reality was just that you went fast over stuff so needed the same strength.


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 11:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thanks, will do.

You should ride it at the HONC, be a good choice of bike for the course.


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 11:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But not as good as my CX bike ๐Ÿ™‚ (probably - there are some conditions that I'd consider riding it with the CX tyres fitted).


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 11:46 am
 timc
Posts: 2509
Free Member
 

Clubber, Whats with your Seat layback?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 12:34 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

http://www.flickr.com/groups/1010382@N22/


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 12:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5290/5366319431_39590c5646.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5290/5366319431_39590c5646.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/paul_fulford/5366319431/ ]Singlespeed Swift[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/paul_fulford/ ]paulfulford[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

usually reducing the travel doesn't reduce the axel-crown length

Are you on crack? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 1:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

timc - Member
Clubber, Whats with your Seat layback?

clubber - Member
oh, seatpost/saddle position, you mean?

25" TT is fine - I've just always liked the saddle a fair way back behind the BB


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 1:05 pm
Posts: 760
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]
Here's mine, need to take some better pics but not had it long. Loving it though


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 17395
Full Member
 

jfeb - Member
A Gryphon rather than a Swift, but as no one ever says "lets see photos of a Singular Gryphon"...

Well I like it ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 1:28 pm
 timc
Posts: 2509
Free Member
 

clubber - Member
oh, seatpost/saddle position, you mean?
25" TT is fine - I've just always liked the saddle a fair way back behind the BB

Have you some kind of Gibbon arms or hobbit legs?


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Technically if you're talking about some sort of KOPs position then longer femurs will require a saddle further back. And it's a long back I have, rather than particularly long arms.


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 1:58 pm
 timc
Posts: 2509
Free Member
 

freak ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 2:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

possibly so..


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 2:03 pm
 Pogo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I want one, defo gonna be my next purchase... ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 2:04 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
 

here's mine, Love it but quite fancy a crosser might swap for the right bike.....

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

Cheers Steve


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 2:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thanks all some great pics / ideas here, does appear most keep the stock steel fork - looks long though, anyone have trouble keeping the front end down when climbing due to the long fork ?

Might consider some carbon exotics to drop the front - anyone ?
๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 4:15 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
 

I was going to get some carbon ones but after a few rides I felt I didnt need to, handles the climbs out of the valley fine, I was going to get some carbons to take some of the vibrations out, broken wrist is a bit sensitive.

Cheers Steve


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 4:23 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

does appear most keep the stock steel fork - looks long though, anyone have trouble keeping the front end down when climbing due to the long fork ?

keeping front end down is fine with rigid fork... though i replaced mine
it is just nicer to ride with suspension fork.. though the stock swift fork is quite absorbing/flexy to some degree, can't see a carbon fork being any more comfortable

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 18/01/2011 4:36 pm
Page 1 / 2