Forum menu
Not quite 29+ tyres...
 

[Closed] Not quite 29+ tyres, some recommendations pls.

Posts: 2609
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#7945068]

After reading the post about the Trek Stache, I've been intrigued by the whole 29Plus thing.

So, while my surly fork will be ok for tyres up to 3" wide, the wheels I've had my eyes on (superstar xx27 29er) work best with 29er tyres up to 2.8" wide.

What are my options for tyres, say 2.5" to 2.8" wide?

Ta ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 14/07/2016 9:42 pm
Posts: 343
Full Member
 

Fat B Nimble is not that big for a 29+


 
Posted : 14/07/2016 10:48 pm
Posts: 24439
Full Member
 

Vittoria bomboloni 29x3 is actually about 2.8


 
Posted : 15/07/2016 5:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surly Dirt Wizzards are much smaller than Knards (both claimed to be 29x3")


 
Posted : 15/07/2016 8:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There's a Nobby Nic 2.6 just about to be released.


 
Posted : 15/07/2016 9:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I disagree with Rocketdog on this, my bombolonis (on hugo's) size up big, the fat be nimbles and dirt wizards are a bit smaller though


 
Posted : 15/07/2016 10:33 am
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

Rim width does make a difference


 
Posted : 15/07/2016 10:35 am
 mos
Posts: 1588
Full Member
 

Fat B's on a 38mm rim come up at about 2.8". I managed to fit one on the back of my Lurcher.


 
Posted : 15/07/2016 12:14 pm
Posts: 24439
Full Member
 

I disagree with Rocketdog on this, my bombolonis (on hugo's) size up big, the fat be nimbles and dirt wizards are a bit smaller though

narrower on a dually than a 29x3 chronicle


 
Posted : 15/07/2016 4:21 pm
Posts: 2609
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thank you for your contributions.

Great suggestions for someone that's plus curious but doesn't want to go down the road of boost hubs, forks and odd looking rims.

The fatb nimble looks like a good contender. Still can't believe the figures for its rolling resistance, or lack of!

Cheers ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 15/07/2016 6:39 pm