Forum search & shortcuts

Not convinced
 

[Closed] Not convinced

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😆
Chapeau.


 
Posted : 08/01/2013 2:52 pm
Posts: 1980
Full Member
 

I'm thinking cranks woven from a single MysteriumTM nanofibre exactly a gazillion light years long, using Dense Fractal TechnologyTM and a 4D-Optimized Quantum-Weave ContructionTM - with one end attached to the pedal and the other to the bb.

On your right...


 
Posted : 08/01/2013 2:52 pm
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

Im surprised Crank Bros havent done them yet.

They use the same scientists that bring you hair shampoo and anti aging cream.

The new Crank Bros strapline - "Why use engineering when you can use marketing"


 
Posted : 08/01/2013 2:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If Crank Bros were to make them they would come in a very pretty box.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 08/01/2013 3:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lots of different opinions here regarding the L shaped cranks - but has anyone tried them? I have over quite a long period. At the time they came out I think it was Ian Camish a succesful Time Trialist who used them racing.


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 2:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All they can possibly do is feel different because they are more flexible. That's it. There is no increase in leverage, removal of dead spots or power transmission advantage. None.


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 2:58 pm
Posts: 13496
Full Member
 

Blimey, thread raised from the dead!

To believe in these you would have to be a bit of a crank! Probably a bent one.


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 3:07 pm
Posts: 7097
Free Member
 

Dear god,

please kill this thread with fire, before I become infected with stupid.

Ta


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 3:08 pm
Posts: 20986
 

too late...

edit oops misread your post it read 'it' not 'I' apologies.

Though it now appears I've been infected....


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 3:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

See you at next years Tour.


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 3:30 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

See you at next years Tour.

I'll bring the pig...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 4699
Full Member
 

But what if they were on a conveyor?


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 3:42 pm
Posts: 8404
Full Member
 

Well they are square taper so that alone means they're better than most of the alternatives. 🙂


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 4:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its bolox, the torque is a function of length of the lever from the axis, as the z frame is rigid it doesn't matter where the rest of it goes, the leverage distance is still the distance from the applied force (the foot) and the axle.

For example if you continued the Z bend and brought back to 180 degrees so it was lying back against itself, no-one would look twice at it, or if you created one big circle at the end of the lever that described its arc around the axle, no one would consider this to be better than a normal crank arm either.

Pseudo science - anyone know how their team got on in that race they mentioned?


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

At the time they came out I think it was Ian Camish a succesful Time Trialist who used them racing.

Indeed.
But then again Geriant Thomas wears a power balance band.
[img] [/img]

And he's faster than me too.

Oh and pig man makes me smile with joy every time I see him 😀


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 5:54 pm
Posts: 41874
Free Member
 

I'm loving the (apparntly too) subtle (for some) photoshopery in this thread 🙂


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 568
Free Member
 

Unless i have lost my mind. I think it will work. Google torque wrench extension formula and think about it


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 6:21 pm
Posts: 1980
Full Member
 

You have lost your mind


 
Posted : 08/08/2013 9:46 pm
Page 2 / 2