Forum menu
Nobby Nic on front ...
 

[Closed] Nobby Nic on front - direction ?

Posts: 17447
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#5679512]

Just popped a set of these on, following the direction arrow. The front looks wrong way though, with outer knobs chevroned with front wider than rear. Am I right ? Rotation arrows don't suggest running front and rear opposite ways round. Ta


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 2:01 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

the ones I tried didn't really grip so running them backwards might help (can't get any worse)


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Many people run these in the opposite direction, i just run one on the rear in its printed direction.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 17447
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Shindiggy, thanks. I put them front and back, to see how they compare to Purgatory's. First ride on them today and seemed of, front just looks 'wrong' 🙂


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 2:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd direct them to the bin


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 2:29 pm
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

Chuck 'em - useless in anything resembling slime or mud. I'd rather have a Racing Ralph on the front.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 4:21 pm
Posts: 17447
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Wow, lots of negative views ! So which direction? Although I do think I prefer the purgatorys 🙂


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 7:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd rather have a Racing Ralph on the front.

I replaced a worn out Racing Ralph with a new Nobby Nic and reached the same conclusion. Sketchy tyres! The RR were more predictable in the wet.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 7:27 pm
Posts: 2135
Full Member
 

The only direction these tyres need to go towards is the skip. Worst tyres i have ever run. 🙁


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 7:30 pm
 mokl
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just for balance I like the one I run up front on my 26 hardtail (pacestar evorun tubeless). Seems predictable and well balanced to me, but then I tend to run the fastest rolling tyres I can get away. As an XC tyre (which is what it is) I rate them - most of my riding is woody/rooty with little rock. I run it in the direction proposed on the tyre wall.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 7:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Funny how some people get on with tyres and others don't, I haven't had an issue with them myself...or maybe I haven't experienced the fantastic tyres you guys are on.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 7:41 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I always put all my tyres on backwards, really just to annoy other riders......


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 8:12 pm
Posts: 801
Free Member
 

Okay as a rear tyre - centre blocks hoof you up quickly.

I am finding mine a bit sketchy in the wet. No good in mud. Clear quite well mind.

I think Schwalbe make better tyres. The Hans Dampf are awesome in the dry, for instance.

AJT


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 8:52 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Been running a pair of the cheap 'Performance' compound version for a couple of months - £18.00 each from Germany, damn good value.

Just back from a week in Wensleydale & they were fine - no moments on wet roots & rock, gripped fine on sopping wet rocky climbs.
Fine round Calderdale in mixed conditions too.
Not the most confidence inspiring, not a lot of 'feel' but the grip is there.

Awful in mud though (clog very quickly and don't seem to clear very well) and draggy on all surface.
They also seem very dependant on tyre pressures - there's quite a narrow window where they feel comfy & still grip without risking snakebites.

However, I've just checked and realised I'm running them the 'wrong' way round!
They recommended direction seems to be at odds with a lot of recent designs.
Ah well, I'll try them the 'right' way round & see how it goes. 😀

Still prefer XR4's, Ignitors, Purgs and Smorgs, but they are very good value.

No issues at all with the cheaper 'Performance' compound, despite many warnings of impending doom from many on here.

Mind you, I utterly despise High Rollers and other flatter tyres with a pronounced gap between centre and side tread, so fully understand why some people don't like 'em.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 9:09 pm
Posts: 1349
Free Member
 

I run as directed and the expensive version front and rear. Makes sense on the front when you think about how little you actually turn the bars at speed.
1500 miles on the front and 1000 on the back. Still running but well worn now.

Excellent where I am in the dry. Fine at trail centres.
Get by in the winter but wouldn't buy them as winter tyres.

YMMV


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 9:11 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Some like them others don't...I've used one as my front winter tyre for the last 5-6 years.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 10:45 pm
Posts: 66109
Full Member
 

Old Nobby Nics had reverse direction marks- rear was supposed to go the opposite way round from the front. New ones I think are both supposed to go in the same direction. I reckon they're limited, shortlived and expensive no matter what direction they point.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 11:17 pm
Posts: 17447
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Hmmm, purgatory's are back on for now as more grippy.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 11:23 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

well I really like Nobby Nics as a front tyre.
and they do look the wrong way round on the front, but they aren't.


 
Posted : 10/11/2013 11:23 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

I agree with brakes on both points ^^
but back along i got lucky and bought a couple of ust 'evo'/triple compounds at 50% off, so rather hard to get on and off, a bit heavier i suppose but durable and sidewalls don't rip like the racier schwalbe tyres of yore, even at comedy lower pressures. They have worn pretty well and grip fine on the front; in our local mud and the quantocks, I find very little difference between my 2.1 triple compound NN on the front and a 2.0 mud x or a spesh captain in similar size. Never tried one on the back mind, always gone for lower profile tread.


 
Posted : 11/11/2013 1:03 am
Posts: 17447
Full Member
Topic starter
 

So many hate them ands some love them 🙂 .

Back to the direction thing, those that do use them seem to go with the direction arrows even though the front 'looks wrong'. Ok, my question appeawres answered !


 
Posted : 11/11/2013 8:31 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Yeah,run the right way round...even though it does look wrong........


 
Posted : 11/11/2013 8:57 am