Forum menu
more people switchi...
 

[Closed] more people switching to flats for xc riding....

Posts: 17448
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#6213916]

I put a post up the other day about opinions on pedals for a skills course, lots of good feedback, thanks.

I was noticing on a ride last night that less than 1/3 of the group, (self and a few others) weere on SPDs. A couple of yrs ago I reckon the majority would have been on SPD's.

Why the change ?


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 9:53 am
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

Why the change ?

It's betterer and for most people the efficiency gains are meaningless.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 9:54 am
Posts: 3729
Free Member
 

Did you ask them?

Why would you think that your group is now (or in the past for that matter) representative of the wider riding community?


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 9:55 am
Posts: 17448
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Did you ask them?

Why would you think that your group is now (or in the past for that matter) representative of the wider riding community?

err, no, just wondering about it on reflection.... 😯


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 9:58 am
Posts: 21643
Full Member
 

Same reason why tyres got fatter, stems shorter, bars risier and angles slacker.

People seem to be more interested in grins than xc speed.

When this first started happening (for me it was 1998) we called them "fat and happy" bikes. Having said that, I only swapped to flats about 3 years ago.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've moved to flats for two reasons, firstly my spds are on my commuter and I can't afford to buy another set nor be arsed to keep swapping. Secondly it's a new bike and I always get a bit too ambitious so the flats give me the bail out security. I'm loving the flats again so will probably just upgrade them rather than replace with spds.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:03 am
Posts: 6290
Full Member
 

It could be that XC is getting more technical.

Personally I've gone with flats because I find them much better for the bits when I'm not on the bike (e.g. pushing/carrying), easier to get started again if I have to dab in a technical section and because I can't detect any performance advantage to SPDs. It's not that I haven't tried. I've done timed runs on the same segments with flats and SPDs and I just can't detect any significant difference in speed. YMMV of course.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:03 am
Posts: 6256
Full Member
 

define "XC"

I use both SPD and flats.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:05 am
Posts: 17448
Full Member
Topic starter
 

define "XC"

I am meaning general trail riding, natural stuff, trail centres, not downhill, jumps, trialsy stuff


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:08 am
Posts: 4370
Full Member
 

Trail centres happened I reckon. Before casual riders like me, would have just gone out for ride, heathery singletrack and fire roads mainly, now I can nip out and he sort of trails that used to be hidden in the woods are now nicely signposted for me, so I'm doing more techy riding than I used to.

I still own some spuds, might have to put some on one of my bikes later today I've run out of decent flats and can't afford another pair for my new bike 😕


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:11 am
Posts: 1711
Free Member
 

In the past it was seen you had to use SPDs to be a serious rider as they were that much better. But they aren't that much better, they are just different and I think people are realising this and trying flats more. I use clipless on my xc race bike but flats on my trail bike. There is a lot I like about flats and to be honest I don't notice a loss in efficiency enough to worry about it.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:15 am
Posts: 6256
Full Member
 

SPDs for general trail riding, most natural stuff, and all that just get out and ride stuff.
Flats for trail centres, and the slightly more technical or mountainous natural stuff.
And sometimes PD-M545's which are caged SPDs.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:15 am
Posts: 8401
Full Member
 

I gave flats a try around 2 years ago for my xc wheels on the ground riding after 5 years of toe clips followed by 20 years of spd's. I've no intention of going back, I just prefer not being attached to the bike and I think the improvement in pedals and shoes means I have no concern about my feet slipping. The only worry I have is is it ok to mix flat shoes and Lycra? 🙂


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 10:26 am
Posts: 13192
Free Member
 

there is a certain percentage of 'serious' or shall we say snobby mtb riders than consider spds to be what you choose when you are serious about mtbing, like 'pahh he's still on flats, must be an amateur'
I've noticed this on here and other forums and within my local mtb club. I prefer flats too. DMR V8s here.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:03 am
Posts: 451
Free Member
 

There's some strange views on here... I use spds for everything, xc racing, commuting, trails... I just feel more secure with my feet clipped in - nothing to do with snobbery 😆


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:09 am
Posts: 4004
Free Member
 

Use what feels comfortable to you.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:13 am
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

It's betterer
except of course you are wrong.

I'd guess either people are doing more technical riding/crashing or it's a fashion thing.
fashion stating previously "SPDs are for serious cyclists" so most were on spds and now "flats are for gnarr cyclists" and we get a big shift to flats.

SPDs for me, used to have flats for playing around on (aka practising skills stuff), don't get time to play now, I just ride so I'll take every advantage. I don't fall off much so the ejector seat side of flats doesn't appeal to me but I do however pedal every ride so efficiency gains of spds do appeal 🙂


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Numerous contributory factors for me:

1. My riding is tending more towards big mountains and tech descents, so flats suit me for both the hike-a-bike climbs and the tech descents. Good all-round compromise.

2. Getting clipped into spds was sometimes an issue when there was no easy run-in to an obstacle.

3. More feedback and less float. First thing that I noticed on first day on flats was that there was slight wear in the swingarm bearing. Never felt it on SPDs.

4. Consistancy. I have a few bikes, ranging from 180 F/S to 140 H/T. Flats work for all of them.

5. Wear. SPD pedals and cleats both wore out pretty quickly for me, and with a few bikes/shoes wearing at different rates, interchangability between which pairs of SPD shoes on which bikes was just overcomplicating things.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:27 am
Posts: 2909
Full Member
 

i think its cos the stock advice now is to learn on flats - people buying bikes are advised to get flats to learn on. therefore more people start on flats and once confident the move to spd`s is harder to justify.

i ride both and see teh benefits of both. for decent length rides spds are more efficient but it does limit that 'ooh a cheeky wallride, i'll give that a go' aspect to your ride which i miss when i'm clipped in.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:34 am
Posts: 8040
Full Member
 

100% about flexibility for me. My bikes get used for riding with my two young children, club xc out in the hills riding and utility trips. I would be changing pedals twice or more a week and frankly I cannot be bothered. If I was planning a rare full on day in the South Downs I might bung the spuds back on for the extra arch support from the disco slippers.

I also think my pedalling action (flexing properly at the ankle) is better on flats because it needs to be.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:34 am
Posts: 15459
Full Member
 

there is a certain percentage of 'serious' or shall we say snobby mtb riders than consider spds to be what you choose when you are serious about mtbing, like 'pahh he's still on flats, must be an amateur'
I've noticed this on here and other forums and within my local mtb club. I prefer flats too. DMR V8s here.

Eh? Where did you get all that from?
Has anyone ever actually said something like that to you?
If anything STW seems to be full "Flat pedal evangelists" at the minute but I don't think there's quite the tension over pedal choice that you seem to imagine?

I'd say the vast majority of MTBers actually DGAF, it's only bike-bores that over think and then "Tribalise" these minor kit choice "issues"...

My personal "Journey" with pedals has been Clips and Straps for a most of the 90s, went to riding flats in the late 90s stuck with that through the 00s and took up SPDs in the last 3-4 years or so and now only ride SPDs...

Apparently I buck the supposed current "trend" but the reality is that people use whatever they believe works best for them, I simply decided SPDs worked for me (after years of resistance), I could pick up flats again tomorrow, but I'm not all that bothered by them at the minute...

Both clips and flats are used quite successfully by all sorts of riders for all sorts of riding, its really not a big deal... Honest.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:49 am
 scud
Posts: 4108
Free Member
 

SPD's for 90% of riding, except i switch to flats for riding in the Alps, don't know why, just prefer it being easier to bail out, plus find it easier getting on/off chair lifts and pushing the bike.

And flats on the fat bike, mostly ride on sand, so often just grind to a half and flats and large standover mean i still have both testicles.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 11:58 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

cookeaa - Member

Eh? Where did you get all that from?
Has anyone ever actually said something like that to you?

I've had, in all seriousness, "Surprised you've not upgraded to SPDs, you're quite good now". Like flats were something I was supposed to have grown out of.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:02 pm
Posts: 7630
Free Member
 

Fashion isn't it? Sam Hill won some stuff, Steve Jones decoded it must be because he was on flat pedals and everyone decided that rad riders wear flats.

I prefer SPDs for all riding, I find I have much greater control over what the bike is doing, don't dab and my feet will not come off the pedals unless I want them to. Flats for me are a backwards step, and I have noticed that the fastest dh riders (the ones winning world cups) are back on spds again now.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it's a fashion thing.
fashion stating previously "SPDs are for serious cyclists" so most were on spds and now "flats are for gnarr cyclists" and we get a big shift to flats.

This.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I think that now you can buy a 160mm bike you can pedal all day, switching to flats just reflects that fact. Even probably 5 or 6 years ago, a 160mm bike was compromised for everyday use in the UK, and so most people had an HT or shirt travel FS, and rode in SPD's. Now you can buy a super capable mince tank yet riding it anywhere, i think more people have moved to flats to suit the more technical riding that bike can support. And the trail centre point made above is pretty valid to i think


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:15 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I've never had a crank spin round and **** me in the shins since I went to SPDs, and for that alone I'll stick with them. I do pedal noticeably better on them too, but that could be be familiarity.
Probably just use case though - how many flat pedal users are out doing 20-30 miles with a few bits of nice singletrack vs hammering technical terrain? My riding is mainly the former, and I prefer SPD for it.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:28 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

munrobiker - Member

Fashion isn't it? Sam Hill won some stuff, Steve Jones decoded it must be because he was on flat pedals and everyone decided that rad riders wear flats.

Then last year, Pinkbike ran a pseudo-science article "proving" that SPDs were best, because only one rider had won a world cup race on flats in the 2 seasons before. But ignoring that only 4 riders had won a world cup at all- so what it basically meant was "Whatever Aaron Gwin and Greg Minaar have on their feet wins races"

My switch was for medical reasons, my leg's not keen on any sort of twisting but still, I'm probably as happy on flats as I ever was on SPDs. And I love that I can just jump on my bikes and go


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:31 pm
Posts: 18200
Full Member
 

For me, it's so I can do this round Cannock...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:36 pm
 GEDA
Posts: 1631
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:36 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

[i]SPDs for general trail riding, most natural stuff, and all that just get out and ride stuff.
Flats for trail centres, and the slightly more technical or mountainous natural stuff.
[/i]

This.

If I'm riding by myself or looking at XCing with 1 or 2 others I'll run SPD's> If we are going for a local group ride it's bound to include a load of (more) technical stuff - so flats.

[i]how many flat pedal users are out doing 20-30 miles with a few bits of nice singletrack vs hammering technical terrain? My riding is mainly the former, and I prefer SPD for it. [/i]

When I was Southern-based it just wasn't worth going flats for the few yards of real techie stuff, but now living in Scotland I've downhill trails that last for nearly a mile 🙂


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:37 pm
Posts: 4178
Full Member
 

I can't speak for anyone else, but the thought of having to change my shoes in order to just dick about on a bike makes me sad.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:46 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

I've always used SPDs and like being connected to the bike. Other than that I couldn't care less what other people use, like or dislike TBH


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's probably a mixture of fashion and what you are used to. There's also the cost of switching: it used to be that switching to SPDs was the expensive direction but looking at flats nowadays there isn't much between switching either way. Give or take: pedals - £50, shoes - £90, you might need shin pads when going to flats as well.

When SPDs first came out most flat pedals weren't particularly good so the benefits of clipless outweighed the cost of switching. Modern flats are much better so the difference is much less.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:54 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

[i]I can't speak for anyone else, but the thought of having to change my shoes in order to just dick about on a bike makes me sad. [/i]

What, you think we carry whichever shoes/pedals we aren't using just in case? 😉


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 12:57 pm
Posts: 28712
Full Member
 

how many flat pedal users are out doing 20-30 miles with a few bits of nice singletrack vs hammering technical terrain?

a 30-40km ride for me is quite common. I've tried SPD's and didn't like them, feel far more confident and happy on flats. So, it's flats for me.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:04 pm
Posts: 1980
Full Member
 

Like most things, it's largely fashion.

For me, SPDs are more efficient for flat-out XC speed. Lots of the guys I ride with are (unfashionably) into sprinting about all over the place and I find keeping up with them on flats is a pain.

I prefer flats for those (fashionable) technical, downhill-orientated rides where you're not rushing up the hills and along the flat bits.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:10 pm
Posts: 6809
Full Member
 

As has been said, it's mostly fashion. SPD's used to be in fashion, now flats are. Just the same way as an upright riding position was in fashion, then a low, race position with narrow bars, now back to upright with bars getting wider everyday. Other examples are available.

As much as the mags and sites like this praise the current trends as the greatest thing ever, they were doing exactly the same for the old fashionable things in the past. I remember when long, slack bikes were scoffed at even though the benifit of them now was still the case then. If you shout loud enough and repeat it over and over people will believe you.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:11 pm
Posts: 2053
Free Member
 

Recently had a foray with flats after years of spuds.

Flats were 100% responsible* for my now broken scaphoid. If I was clipped in I wouldn't have superman'd and landed on my hands, I'd have stuck with the bike and landed on my elbow pads / shoulder / hip.

*not necessarily true


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:13 pm
Posts: 14171
Full Member
 

What scares SPD users from riding flats for XC is the fear that it'll make them much slower because of the huge loss in efficiency - but it's simply not true. Yes there is a marginal gain hence it would be foolish to do serious XC racing in flats (except in really muddy conditions) but it is a tiny difference in average long-term applied power.

When I started riding again in 2009 most in my circle were on clips but now it's definitely the other way around. Some of the clips riders have switched to flats all/part of the time but most newcomers are starting on flats and staying on flats.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:16 pm
Posts: 963
Full Member
 

Why would you want to wear SPDs for a GMBC ride? You'll only get 10' before you need to unclip and wait for someone to stop faffing. 😛


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:18 pm
Posts: 17448
Full Member
Topic starter
 

GHill - Member
Why would you want to wear SPDs for a GMBC ride? You'll only get 10' before you need to unclip and wait for someone to stop faffing.

Posted 1 minute ago # Report-Post

I guess youre missing us then Grant ? 🙂


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:20 pm
Posts: 963
Full Member
 

iainc - Member
I guess youre missing us then Grant ?

Only for the cafe stops and banter 😉


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:25 pm
Posts: 1980
Full Member
 

I agree that the speed advantage of SPDs is marginal. But it is real and noticeable when riding hard.

For me, the advantages of flats are marginal, too. When I use them it's because I like the feel/experience, not because they are 'better'.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Spuds are cheating, but then again, I still use clips and straps.


 
Posted : 23/05/2014 1:37 pm
Page 1 / 3