Forum menu
Lightweight singles...
 

[Closed] Lightweight singlespeeds .... show yours off!

Posts: 4338
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Got some lightweight carbon bars and rocket rons at the moment. around the 22lb mark


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 9:35 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

Wow, that Obed is [i]slightly[/i] obsessive...

[url= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5288/5227590978_df7a1e9cd6.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5288/5227590978_df7a1e9cd6.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/8133348@N03/5227590978/ ]IMG_6338[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/8133348@N03/ ]oxym0r0n[/url], on Flickr

With summer tyres this has to be around 22-23lb


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 9:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Litespeed Obed M Frame 1530
Mortop Headset 60
Trigon Forks 493
Ameriacn classic wheels 1404
KCNC Ti Skewers 45
Kenda Klimax tires 660
Maxxis flyweight tubes 160
Wellgo M111 pedals 240
KCNC ISIS Crank/bolts 470
Renthal 32Chain ring 35
KCNC BB/bolts 155
KCNC VB-1 brakes F/R 250
XTR Cables 78
KCNC Seat clamp 10
KMC x9SL Chain 210
Kestrel Bars 110
Syntace F99 90mm Stem 96
143 toupe Saddle 170
KCNC Post 153
Pork rind grips 17
superstar 14t Sprocket 28

6374g 14.05 lbs


Blimey - that makes my unicycle (and my road bike for that matter) seem positively lardy ๐Ÿ˜ฏ
Is it strong enough?!


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 9:52 pm
 will
Posts: 44
Free Member
 

on and on - Impressive!

That Bontrager on the previous page looks nice too ๐Ÿ™‚

Mine, in at around 19lbs, could take another 2lbs or so off, but that would cost money.
[img] [/img]

This is how it was first built and gives you a better idea
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 10:05 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

strong and very fun. I have no issues with pretty aggressive riding and don't think twice about strength or breakages.

Obsessive, No. I had most of the parts in the shed. It was just a matter of waiting for the right frame to come along so they could all be used.

One of my all time fave bikes - this single speed thing could catch on ๐Ÿ™‚

I've been thinking of putting the parts on my Carbon XTC frame. should be looking at 13.3 lbs LOL


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 10:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Scandal 29er S/S fully rigid, just under 20lb!
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/04/2011 10:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Cannondale Taurine when it was only one-geared... As is, it was 19lbs. How there are steel bikes on here that are much lighter is beyond me. Unfortunately I don't have this any more as I had to trim the fleet down a little... Gutted! ๐Ÿ™ One day I may get another one as similar to this as I can.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 5:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] ?ver=12961409540001[/img]
[img] ?ver=12965651620001[/img]


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 7:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There seems to be some confusion how to get a S/S mountain bike to weigh around the low 20's mark!
My answer!
Frame.
Wheels and tyres.

Get this right and your on the way to the low 20's for a 29er and sub 20's for the little wheeled bikes! ๐Ÿ˜†

Oh! I nearly forgot!!!! MONEY!!!!


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 7:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Smuzzy,

I believe you!!! The Scandal is a light frame!!! ๐Ÿ˜‰

It's good to see you had some change left from the kitchen to do the bike! ๐Ÿ˜†

Off to work now!


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 7:28 am
Posts: 10197
Full Member
 

[img] ?psid=1[/img]

[img] ?psid=1[/img]

[img] ?psid=1[/img]

[img] ?psid=1[/img]

don't see the point of a weight weenie singlespeed ๐Ÿ˜‰

weights from 19.2lb to a whopping 22.5lb!

dont't have any pics of my old scandium voodoo sobo in singlespeed guise but that was just under 17lbs (it did have ikkle wheels though)


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 8:42 am
 Andy
Posts: 3348
Free Member
 

What bar ends please Tazzymtb?

....and I'm not posting a pic of my Swift, because at 24lbs with front suspension its not lightwieght! Might post a photo of the ridgeline when its done though..


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 8:59 am
Posts: 10197
Full Member
 

andy, there are some ergon race jobbos on the salsa, look iffy but very very good

and the some serfas ones on the on-ones. Singletrack solutions ones from the states are fantastically light but not very crash proof, I killed my uber light ones and vent back to the slightly heavier serfas ones.


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 9:07 am
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

Lickle mountain bikes look good, a lot better than gates like mine but lickle 29ers (sorry tazzy) just look weird.

imho of course.


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 9:54 am
Posts: 10978
Free Member
 

JTS with WI EE

from this
[img] ?zz=1[/img]

to this
[img] [/img]

rims ****ed into unuseable after 2 winters trail riding

its all in the seasons ๐Ÿ˜€

its going to be converted into non niche core 105 10spd shortly as i got steep hills on my doorstep now

anyone wants a 700c SS / fixed wheelset with heavily worn open pros - email in profile


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 10:00 am
Posts: 1349
Free Member
 

23.48lbs with Racing Ralphs on that I'm currently using and not including the bottle. Note - scales used have not been calibrated but if they're good enough for cooking...

Still a way to go with bars/stem/seatpost specifically but no money or justification at the moment.

[url= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5020/5540004961_6112867cec_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5020/5540004961_6112867cec_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomlevell/5540004961/ ]Simple[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/tomlevell/ ]tomlevell[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 10:18 am
Posts: 10197
Full Member
 

DONK- I agree the ikkle on-one was a weird looking little beastie. Stupidly fast and could be a bit too "lively" when flat out. A bit like Kato from the pink panther, one minute all is fine, the next minute it's jumped out of wardrobe trying to kill you with an iron

the selma is a much more sensible bike for a nice sensible chap like myself


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 10:51 am
Posts: 1409
Free Member
 

ChunkyMTB, do you use a lefty4all for that setup? How do you get on with it?


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 10:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just to be different, here is a picture of a singlespeed bicycle actually being ridden, not propped up against a post/tree etc or all shiny and unridden looking in someone's kitchen or garden.

As you can see, it is so light it floats several inches from the ground. Which, considering it weighs a portly 27lbs even without all the paraphernalia, is really quite remarkable.

I manage to negate the considerable weight disadvantage by actually just riding and enjoying the thing, rather than obsessing over things that really don't need obsessing about.... ๐Ÿ˜‰

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 11:38 am
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

^ and your boobs look nice in that photo ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 11:40 am
Posts: 10197
Full Member
 

elfin, most of us don't take pictures when we're out as we are too busy having fun riding ๐Ÿ˜‰

I take it the piccy of you was taken by a concerned parent worried about the strange man trying to groom all the children in the woods ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No it was taken by PeterPoddy. That some children being in the picture automatically makes you think of noncery is a rather worrying reflection on yourself, I'd say. ๐Ÿ˜•

and your boobs look nice in that photo

Thank you, but tell me, tell me:

Does my bum look big in that photo?


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

Not at all Fred. I see you have tried to fashion some kind of arse-fascinator from your coat though...


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

arse-fascinator

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 12:21 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

just riding and enjoying the thing, rather than obsessing over things that really don't need obsessing about
I'd obsess about the positioning of that rear mudguard if I was you


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

It's not terribly light weight, and it's a dodgy phone pic, and worse yet it's probably a size too big for me - but it's a bucketload of fun ๐Ÿ™‚

Sadly now returned to gears for the sunnier times to tow children around.


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 12:48 pm
Posts: 10197
Full Member
 

Sadly now returned to gears for the sunnier times to tow children around.

[img] [/img]

SPLITTER!


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 12:50 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

No idea on the actual weight but I reckon I'm pretty near the top of the lightness list for this thread.
[url= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2444/4014006956_01d1555ec3_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2444/4014006956_01d1555ec3_z.jp g"/> ?zz=1[/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/53067724@N00/4014006956/ ]Van tuyl[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/53067724@N00/ ]Jon Wyatt[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 10197
Full Member
 

there are pics on the net of sub 14lb niner carbon single speed and singular have a pegasus down to beautifully light as well (17lb is from memory)

ace weights for big wheelers


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 1:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fat Chance Wicked:

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]
19.5lbs


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 1:20 pm
Posts: 4915
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Not the one I was looking for but impressive sub 15lb for a big wheeler :

[img] [/img]

Cool bikes.

Thank you to all that have posted - some great inspiration and ideas.

Plus great new word learned ..... arse-fascinator


 
Posted : 28/04/2011 1:51 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
Posts: 5047
Full Member
 

pmsl at some of the bikes on here, ive just stuck my p7 on the scales and its 29.2 lbs. with slicks on.
can barely believe it, it rides great tho.


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 12:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Being an Inbred it's not actually all that light though! I'd be surprised if it's much lighter than my Epic in fact.


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 7:12 am
Posts: 466
Full Member
 

Possibly the worst photo in the world, but this is my SS rigid Tinbred

[img] [/img]

Weighs in at about 18.5lbs, although I'm not sure if that includes the spare tube taped to the saddle ๐Ÿ™‚

Cheers, Rich


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 7:57 am
Posts: 7935
Free Member
 

22.6lbs Ti 456 being ridden.

[IMG] [/IMG]

and here it is with an even lighter 20.something rigid that belongs to Candodavid.
[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 10:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lovin that Fat Chance .. yum

But I seriously doubt the 19.5lb


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 11:45 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

22lb 5oz with mudguards.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

17.89lbs, kinda limited in its functionality but still good fun.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I love the look of that YoKaiser . What frame is it?


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cheers on and on, its a Cannondale 3.8 series, weighed at 1792g and got it for a fiver!


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 12:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I dont know the weight and dont really care,

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One gear, one brake(!)

[img] ?v=0[/img]

20.1 lbs IIRC


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 1:55 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I really love the look of some of these 'retro' SS builds. the Cannondale and the Klein are great.


 
Posted : 29/04/2011 4:55 pm
Posts: 490
Full Member
 

No idea of weight, its the first bike i've built from scratch. Surly 1x1 plus various cheap bits/leftovers from old frame. Alread lost a bit of weight when half the transfers fell off during construction.

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 02/05/2011 10:11 pm
Page 2 / 2