Forum menu
Keith Bontragers pa...
 

[Closed] Keith Bontragers partner - court case outcome.

Posts: 6667
Free Member
 

Additional causing death offences have been [url= http://www.qebholliswhiteman.co.uk/practice-areas/articles-pdfs/causing-death-by-careless-driving.pdf ]added to the statute books[/url] (worth reading IMHO), should serious/life-changing injury be added too (or sentencing guidelines amended to reflect such outcomes)


 
Posted : 20/08/2016 7:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

She needs to take Tescos to the cleaners, hopefully she's gets a huge payout as compensation.


 
Posted : 20/08/2016 2:02 pm
Posts: 833
Full Member
 

I want to know why trucks can now do 50mph on single carriageways .

Statistically it is safer. As I understand it, there was research to show that when trucks traveled at 40, cars following behind were likely to get impatient and try to pass, whereas at 50 they were happy to tuck in and follow. Less dodgy overtaking resulted in fewer accidents and fewer deaths.


 
Posted : 20/08/2016 2:23 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

If that really is the reason then that's poo, another example of not actually addressing the issue.

If people were driving dangerously trying to overtake when inappropriate etc. then that should be dealt with, a good old dose of calm-the-f-down would maintain the original safety level for drivers and improve it for other road users, and at what cost? A few seconds on a journey, well big deal...

Edit

cars following behind were likely to get impatient

Please don't fall into that trap, cars don't get impatient, people driving them do.


 
Posted : 20/08/2016 2:42 pm
Posts: 23591
Full Member
 

If that really is the reason then that's poo, another example of not actually addressing the issue.

If people were driving dangerously trying to overtake when inappropriate etc. then that should be dealt with, a good old dose of calm-the-f-down would maintain the original safety level for drivers and improve it for other road users, and at what cost? A few seconds on a journey, well big deal...

I think the bigger problem is having one catch-all limit for a very varied range of roads and infrastructure. Increasing the speed of trucks addresses one problem - dangerous overtaking - but creates other ones. An A road like the A9 is a fairly newly build road - pretty straight, long gentle curves, side road have a slip road on and off, its backed up by a parallel bike /pedestrian path and so on. The A76 near me is the same class of road but its narrow, has no space for pedestrian other than on the carriageway, it has crossroads in dips between blind summits, theres no run on/off slip roads so vehicles need to all but stop to join and leave and so on.

I think we need a two tier national speed limit (for cars as well) - one for roads of a given standard in terms of the safety of junction design, room for other road users and so on and another for roads that don't meet that standard to give more protection to non motorised traffic sharing that space.


 
Posted : 21/08/2016 11:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You have seen the picture?

Ummm, if you tried passing a car like that, you'd hit the side of the car...

and what about riding primary?highway code is ambiguous in this case.


 
Posted : 21/08/2016 12:49 pm
Posts: 43952
Full Member
 

fourbanger - Member
You have seen the picture?

Ummm, if you tried passing a car like that, you'd hit the side of the car...
And if that was the amount of room you had to leave when passing another car then you'd need much wider roads. In short, the picture is pish.


 
Posted : 21/08/2016 2:01 pm
Page 2 / 2