[Closed] I think I want one...

thats horrible

Ew.

no one show Sheldon this

Fugly.........I like it.

That is gopping.

Sorry I can't be more positive.

I'd rather have one of those than a Jones, that said I don't want one.

hideous,really hideous.

¡Muy, pero muy fea!

But this one...
[img] [/img]

A mi, me gusta. 😀

beauty is in the eye of the beholder they say.

I like that, its clean, it appeals to me

straight, non manipulated oversized tubes - much nicer.

Quirky. I like it but I recon I would crack the seat post at the weld. Cant see if the rear triangle breaks for belt/sprocket change either?
Edit. Didn't notice hub 🙄

Frames so hideous did anyone notice that it has flat bars? Its a commuter then.. At least no one would try and steal it.

I like that rather a lot.

But this one...

A mi, me gusta.

But its just so, errm.......normal. 🙁

ROAD VERSION
[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

Specially reduced standover height - why?

But its just so, errm.......normal.

I'd call it stylish, the other frames are a bit too strange for me and I'm perfectly happy to like the unusual.

Nices!

But sometimes normal is nice. A lot of people seem to like the hideous bike above just because it's different.

What is it you actually find pleasing about it? I like the belt drive, that's it. The tube manipulation is just plain ugly, bent tubes just for the sake of it.

Style [i]vs[/i] fashion.

There is something oddly attractive about it... but then, I do like weird looking bikes 🙂

Very nice! I like the look and style of it, looks very purposeful. How much are they?

I be in the market for a cyclo-cross bike. Probably not as pricey as thag but hey..the budget has always been blown apart before!

I like the top tube manipulation in an asthetically pleasing type way..

The flow of the line from the seat stays to the top tube is remeniscent of a hardtail motorbike frame.. I wouldn't buy this piece of expensive fashion accessory though..

That's it, it looks a bit like a motorbike, doesn't it? Does look 'purposeful' though I'd worry about the seattube/toptube interface cracking over time, looks like it'd be taking a lot of stress with the angle of the seatpost?

it's not ugly, warthogs are ugly, and ugly is beautiful at the same time.

that's frame is just stupid.

here's a warthog:

[img] [/img]

I agree ..

It's definitely not ugly.. It possibly may not conform to what some people have allowed themselves to be conditioned towards finding attractive.... but it's not ugly..

After the initial 'wtf' as you opened the page, that has kinda grown on me, don't like downtube though

A lot of people seem to like the hideous bike above just because it's different.

What is it you actually find pleasing about it?

Isn't this how all those pointless STW 'yes it is, no it isn't' bun fights start?

It ain't pretty but I like it. Its as simple as the lines, colours and yes, just being a bit different. I'm shallow.

TTFN.....I'm off to hit the trails. 😯

I think it's a nice bike, designed to get people talking about whether it fugly or not, I like it, the question has to be though ,would I buy it though before some other frames on the market, Hmmmmm, think not.

It's a dumb design for the fashionistas with shrunken goolies.

A straight tube would be lighter and stronger and give a better standover height.

(beavis and butthead) 'it's back's all bent outta shape'

"looks purposeful"

Yeah, but its purpose is to look different for no reason other then to make people buy it, despite the disadvantages that have come as side effects of making it look different.

What epicyclo said.