Forum menu
High Roller II vs A...
 

[Closed] High Roller II vs Advantage sizing?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#6895733]

Anyone know how a 2.3 High Roller [b]II[/b] sizes up compared to a 2.25 Advantage? The old 2.35 HR was quite a bit smaller.

Hoping the new 2.3 about the same as the advantage? (though not a big as a 2.4 Ardent which was too tight in my forks)


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 3:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

HRII a wee bit bigger than the disAdvantage iirc.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 3:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

disAdvantage

you sound as keen on them as me for a front tyre !


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 3:17 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

The new Maxxis measurements are pretty accurate, so the 2.3 HR2 is 0.1 smaller than your Ardent 2.4 ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 6:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

S'funny you should ask because I have that set up on one bike HRII front part-worn advantage rear. The sizing is pretty much spot on the HR is kind of boxy and luggy whereas the Advantage is more rounded.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All the measurements are here.................

[url= http://www.maxxis.co.uk/tyres/cycle/mountain-bike ]Maxxis size chart[/url]

Find the tyre you want and the chart will give you all the variations and sizes in mm.

There is absolutely no logic in the sizing at all, so you need to check each tyre independently.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 8:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thanks, ordered one up to give it a shot


 
Posted : 28/02/2015 12:16 am