Forum menu
Heavyweight weighs ...
 

[Closed] Heavyweight weighs into Heavyweights (caution fatbike content)

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#5508183]

Er... Specialised of all people make a fatbike ... Hoax or genuine or publicity stunt.

[img] http://t.co/NX3eJPu6Tk [/img]

Edit... I'll post the pic layer when I get to a laptop rather than trying to be clever and do it from my phone.


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 8:21 pm
Posts: 2883
Full Member
 

If it's TRUE then they are no longer niche.


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 8:25 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yeah, 3 models, old news


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 8:25 pm
Posts: 4686
Full Member
 

Why shouldn't they..?

Perhaps some people can't handle the fact that a particular variant of bicycle isn't as exclusive and niche as it once was.


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 8:34 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

dunno why some people think we ride them cos they are niche = I ride mine cos I like it and its awesome, thats all

couldn't give a stuff what people think to be fair


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 8:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[IMG] [/IMG] there we go


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 9:17 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i'd buy one to strip the rims from it
they seem very well thought out, hope they will be sold separately


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 9:28 pm
 core
Posts: 2770
Free Member
 

Might make fatbike parts easier (and cheaper) to source.


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 9:45 pm
Posts: 4686
Full Member
 

Must admit they are getting more aesthetic as they evolve.


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 9:45 pm
Posts: 17778
Full Member
 

I'm looking forwards to Spech tyres and rims becoming available.


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 9:51 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I like it I do..


 
Posted : 11/09/2013 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its a snow bike for snow races, so apart from the nice wide rims ideal for beach riding as they will be real light, the rest will be pretty useless for trail riding - though ok for beach riding, but beach riding is i hear on STW all flat and boring according to some ๐Ÿ˜‰

29+ is the fat future for UK trail riding, you wait and see ๐Ÿ˜‰ :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 12/09/2013 11:53 pm
Posts: 176
Free Member
 

Out of curiosity what makes a snow bike useless at trail riding?


 
Posted : 13/09/2013 12:10 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

[quote=househusband ]Must admit they are getting more aesthetic as they evolve.

you mean less fugly ๐Ÿ™‚
I like the fact specialized is joining the bandwagon, fun to see all the Nichesters trying to avoid being mainstream.


 
Posted : 13/09/2013 12:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now they are mainstream, it makes it ok for me to buy one.


 
Posted : 13/09/2013 6:05 am
Posts: 17778
Full Member
 

I like the fact specialized is joining the bandwagon, [s]fun to see all the Nichesters trying to avoid being mainstream[/s] there should be cheaper bits and greater availibility now.

It might come as a bit of a shock but most people ride bikes because they like them and don't even consider what a random person on the internet thinks.
Try not to read too much into what other people ride. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 13/09/2013 7:50 am
Posts: 1055
Free Member
 

I really like it, so much so I spoke to my LBS (Spesh dealer) about when they were due in......and I`m gutted its USA only for 2014 ๐Ÿ˜ฅ

Maybe I will have to do a holiday across the pond this year after all ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 13/09/2013 9:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

deserter - Member
Out of curiosity what makes a snow bike useless at trail riding?

The snow bike designs have longer chainstays, and wider than 80mm rims and 5" tyres make this a more stable set up ideal for sand and snow riding, but too floaty to grip on UK mud, and too draggy on hard pack and tarmac when fitted with the 5" Surly Bud and Lou chunky tyres on UK trails. You may get amazing grip with the bigger footprint but a hell of a drag. I stay away from road and trails with my Moonlander, it is an amazing sand sled/shingle and rock beast though.

4" tyre Pugsleys and On Ones have nice short chainstays, the On One has a slacker head angle - the Pugsley has more forgiving steel, take your pick (On One wins on price, Pug if your a steel fan).
4" fat bikes are a lot more versatile, stick some Nates on and go ride anywhere, what most fatbike owners around here in East Lothian are doing and using them as their MTB`s ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 14/09/2013 6:58 pm
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

Rims look good, tires too.


 
Posted : 14/09/2013 7:37 pm
Posts: 17778
Full Member
 

coastkid.
The only thing wrong with your summing up there is the fact the the 5" Bud if way less draggy and far more grippy than the 4" Nate.


 
Posted : 14/09/2013 8:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I want to believe that I need a fat bike for my local Surrey hill rides. It can get a bit sandy after all.


 
Posted : 14/09/2013 8:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don`t find Nates that draggy Stu or find a lck of grip, running them (folding ones) on 65mm Marges ๐Ÿ™‚

I rode Saltys Moonie with Bud and Lous and noticed the increased drag compared to my BFL shod Moonie ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/09/2013 8:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Today at the Yorkshire Bike Show I heard that Rockshox are going to release a fatbike suspension fork.


 
Posted : 21/09/2013 8:22 pm