Forum menu
Very smart
[img] 
[/img]
I predict DM some Click-bait about how wonderful new technology will soon allow police to [s]persecute[/s] prosecute cyclists for... well, cycling.
Hooray!
[url= http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/north-shore/smart-hat-could-be-the-answer-to-cyclist-registration-councillor-says/story-fngr8h9d-1227121392639?nk=09d13d50fa7453e614e9b7084229995a ]Better yet the Aussies are all over this shit![/url]
I especially like this quote from it's "Designer"...
But Mr King acknowledged the proposal was controversial, saying he would prefer to keep his name out of the public eye in case of any backlash from cyclists against the idea of compulsory registration.
There's nothing quite like standing by your ideas eh?
I was just reading about that on road.cc
http://road.cc/content/news/135666-sydney-designer-comes-helmet-licence-plate-indicators-windscreen-wipers-and-more
The guy actually has backing from one (anti-cyclist) councillor.
I'm assuming it is more of a political statement about how awful those lyrca-wearing cyclist-types are, rather than a serious attempt at a product - but it's hard to be sure!
It's not very aero, is it?
for that reason, I'm out.
Rotational-injury-tastic 😉
Loving the nice unbiased reporting on that Telegraph/Mosman Dail link.
They have this picture:
[img] 
[/img]
With the caption: [i]"Cyclist screaming down the road at around 30-40 km/h when the traffic lights were red." [/i]
Erm... he could certainly do with some lights - but that guy isn't screaming anywhere!
Bit worrying to see how keen Aussies seem to be on compulsory registration and tax on cyclists.
Especially when we see growing UK support for compulsory helmets, which is where the Aussies started...
I WANT IT!!!!
I don't think it's "a political statement about how awful those lyrca-wearing cyclist-types are". It looks like the complete opposite to me; a satirical dig at negative attitudes to cycling in Australia.
The smart hat is blatantly overcomplicated and impractical, and would simply discourage people from cycling. It mirrors the way the Australian authorities have discouraged cycling with unnecessary compulsory helmet rules and proposals about registration.
It looks like the complete opposite to me; a satirical dig at negative attitudes to cycling in Australia.
Yeah I wondered that too - but it seems entirely straight-faced and has anti-cyclist politicians and media backing it, so if it was meant to be ironic it has backfired badly.
Yeah I wondered that too - but it seems entirely straight-faced and has anti-cyclist politicians and media backing it, so if it was meant to be ironic it has backfired badly.
Well, one does wonder...
...if it was meant to be ironic it has backfired badly.
Or succeeded beyond their wildest dreams!
Actually I like, it takes it's styling queues from the good old 'Tuff Top'...
[img] 
[/img]
Reminds me of a simpler, bygone age when any boy caught wearing one by his peers would be beaten senseless for being a Nancy...
This version goes a stage beyond that by, clearly identifying the wearer to any would be bully with flashing lights and a big old reg' plate.
Then of course, post beating their assailant will know exactly where to nick their their phone from, it could probably do with a dinner money compartment for good measure too...
Is there an Australian version of The Apprentice on at the moment?
You're fired..
"Seems entirely straight-faced"
Come on, take a look at the number plate, (or the windscreen wipers...)! It doesn't look very serious to me.
"...has anti-cyclist politicians and media backing it, so if it was meant to be ironic it has backfired badly."
That's not a backfire. Anyone supporting this is going to look daft (see Chris Morris and Cake)
Don't get me wrong - I [i]really[/i] hope that this is some kind of elaborate wind up - but it is just idiotic enough to be true. And a quick read through the [url= http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/north-shore/smart-hat-could-be-the-answer-to-cyclist-registration-councillor-says/story-fngr8h9d-1227121392639?nk=09d13d50fa7453e614e9b7084229995a ]comments here[/url] shows that plenty of people would support it even if it is a joke! 😯
I would rather get fat than wear that!
Looks like it could cause severe rotational injuries.
Who's respononsible for the copy on the advert; that's what I want to know.
Check his registation?
"small warning speaker when the cyclist rides too close to pedestrians"
"in helmet bluetooth display with speaker, full satnav, speedometer, speed zones, temperature, heart rate, tilt sensor, ultrasonic object proximity warning, turn signal indicators, system icons, time"
"batteries"
"provision for an in helmet cooling fan"
"superior comfort and safety in operation"
This HAS to be a paradoy.
That thing's got more kit than most cars.
Nah, a Parody would claim:
[i]"the Smart Hat can Read a wearer's mind and alert the authorities if He/She is considering a possible breach of traffic laws; the police can then decide to either issue a fixed penalty notice or remotely administer an electric shock directly to the rider's temples"[/i]...
[b]UPDATE:[/b] Are we still sure this HAS to be a parody?
He's taking it pretty far if it is:
http://road.cc/content/news/137031-smart-hat-designer-puzzled-cyclists’-negative-response
Joke or not. I would just not wear it.
Civil disobedience FTW!
King admits that he doesn’t actually ride a bike himself
The guy is mental. This is a joke in one way or another.