Forum menu
Hardtails - Outdate...
 

[Closed] Hardtails - Outdated

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Find or build some harder trails?

ie courses for horses ??


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 9:51 pm
Posts: 6321
Full Member
 

@ J-Claw, I think it was the tone of the original post more than the content that annoyed some people.

Unless you were trolling, if so well done ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 9:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

HT for racing,climbs,sprints and descend like a demon. FS for the fun of it (and for the frequent visits to the lakes).


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 9:51 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Hahaha, there was only one way this was going to go.

Good effort.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 9:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hardtail good for this:
[img] [/img]

Hardtail no good for this:
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Aaaahhh, so now you're saying that hardtails have a place?

Dimwit.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Aaaahhh, so now you're saying that hardtails have a place?

Try re-reading the OP...

Unless you're riding on the road, or on extremely smooth trails...


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:08 pm
Posts: 17783
Full Member
 

Stop shooting someone down for stating his opinion.

I don't see anyone shooting anyone down myself.

Just people saying what they like to ride.

As opposed to Mr J cloth who's trying to tell everyone else what they should be riding in his predictable trolly way. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Try re-reading the OP...[/i]

I did; you're a dimwitted troll on the available evidence...


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 511
Free Member
 

My lord me & SFB agreeing. Whatever next? Me out riding with the Boggies?


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I did; you're a dimwitted troll on the available evidence...

If I'm such a troll, why are you getting so upset?


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:15 pm
 rs
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
/p>

^^^^ Hardtail would be fine for that.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you were designing the very first bike for riding off road on rocky, rooty, trails and wanted the best compromise of traction, comfort and speed I think what you'd design would be a FS bike. Hardtails are, I think, something of a a legacy from MTB's infancy.

However anyone can ride what they want to, the choice is theirs.

FS saves my back from a beating and after riding hardtails for years I wouldn't go back. Having said all that my FS is a mere 4 incher and pumped up hard (oooh er missus) it's also a single pivot, my bearings are almost 10 years old and get used several times a week so I don't see a downside to FS.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

^^^^ Hardtail would be fine for that.

FS would be better!


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I repeat......niche hungry idiots.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What's on that bottom pic that you couldn't ride well on a HT with a big fork?
And unless we are talking about gravel tracks and fields, I disagree that HT's are better at XC racing. A light FS is much faster everywhere because it grips better and you can sit-down and put maximum effort into pedalling.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:21 pm
 rs
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

FS would be better!

In what way? I could get down it on either, FS will feel smoother thats all.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:23 pm
 Zone
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

lets not argue our selves into owning only one bike... god forbid... I find it hard enough already to convince the missus I don't need to sell any.....

I remember when I didn't have a choice... there where no full sussers....

I'm glad there are now though ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:24 pm
Posts: 30
Free Member
 

i'm a ht person.

got a short travel full susser for racing (its quicker.)
but, the long forked ht for all other/general riding. its more fun.

depends what you think is getting down it better... if you mean smoother/easier. then fine. but its not much of a challenge once you smooth it out with a full sus!


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:25 pm
Posts: 17783
Full Member
 

nickegg - Member

I repeat......attention hungry troll

.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 2176
Free Member
 

Hmm....I see a challenge coming on....RS Vs J-Cloth in a head to head down Upper and Lower Ladies Only.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

FS would be better!

Really, why? I haven't ridden anything that wouldn't be more fun on a hardtail, while (and here's the important bit) I still have the energy to enjoy myself, to brake when I want to and ride aggressively.

The ONLY time when a FS is more fun is when the trails/DH's/rides are to long to do the above.

For me thats long (>15 mile) loops in the peak, and most alpine riding. Anywhere else where the downs are short or there's time to recover on longer rides. I'll probably be on a HT. I'm sure that everyone has a point a which they'd be having more fun on a FS (if you say no then you're lying! megavalanche? a monster 100km Peak loop?), we're just all different.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]If I'm such a troll, why are you getting so upset? [/i]

I'm not upset, I'm playing the troll game....


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 58
Free Member
 

I've just read the op and can't see what you all are fussing about ??? He's not saying h/t are rubbish and people shouldn't be riding them or are stupid for doing so. Only that in the situations he described his new full sus out performs his old h/t. They of course ride exactly as he describes, that doesn't mean loads of people don't prefer riding h/tails, fully ridgid or whatever.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:53 pm
Posts: 8403
Full Member
 

joolsburger wouldn't be a Marin by any chance would it?


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 10:54 pm
 rs
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

Hmm....I see a challenge coming on....RS Vs J-Cloth in a head to head down Upper and Lower Ladies Only.

Is that picture not pink starfish... at least thats what the link says? I haven't ridden that trail but that bit at least looks doable on HT. I actually did have thoughts about taking the video camera out there this weekend and finding that bit of trail.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Unless you're riding on the road, or on extremely smooth trails then stop kidding yourself - you will be better off on a suspension bike[/i]

That's what he said.

He's a dimwit.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:02 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Oli, isn't it just that Hardtails are harder to break?... ๐Ÿ˜‰

Anyway, the American magazine I read last month said that all mountainbikes with 26" wheels and less than 4 inches of rear travel are rendered obsolete by 29ers... What do we reckon to that?!


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are plenty of trails where hardtails are more fun. Bikes are all about fun so surely they will never be outdated.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 33976
Full Member
 

My 6" full sus has sat in the shed for the last year, my rigid SS and my 6" forked h/tail get all the action. Go figure. Oh, and I was riding full sus bikes in 1990.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

He's a dimwit.

& you are narrow-minded & resistant to/scared of change.

Things move on... Maybe you should too?


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

jojoA1
Anyway, the American magazine I read last month said that all mountainbikes with 26" wheels and less than 4 inches of rear travel are rendered obsolete by 29ers... What do we reckon to that?!

er....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Is that picture not pink starfish... at least thats what the link says? I haven't ridden that trail but that bit at least looks doable on HT.

It is Pink Starfish & I have ridden it on a HT. I've also ridden it on a FS & it was a lot more fun on that. I'm bored of getting beaten up by the trails on my HT. I have a lot more fun [i]riding[/i] the trails on a FS, rather than just making it down them on a HT.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dimwit....

I've had HT and FS, and I take issue with your prescription for the masses; that we'll be better off on a FS.

Not narrow minded, not resistant to/or scared of change, just sensible enough to know a Dimwitted troll when one pops out from under the bridge.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 6321
Full Member
 

Maybe work on your fitness and skill levels, rather than compensating for them with a snazzy bike.

Nowt wrong with snazzy bikes though, I have one.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 6321
Full Member
 

It is Pink Starfish & I have ridden it on a HT. I've also ridden it on a FS & it was a lot more fun on that. I'm bored of getting beaten up by the trails on my HT. I have a lot more fun riding the trails on a FS, rather than just making it down them on a HT.

I think you're confusing fun with speed and comfort. MTBing isn't meant to be comfortable, it sometimes isn't meant to be fast - it's meant to be sweaty, painful, muddy, and tiring. And fun.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

Can't be arsed to read this thread, but you're in Canada aren't you? Don't you have some bromance to kindle? Some brotography to develop? Or a brobecue to attend?


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:20 pm
 rs
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

ok, but your idea of fun and other peoples idea of fun is sometimes different and thats allowed, obviously the full suss is technically a better/more capable bike but fun? Thats a different question. Many people on here have had big full sussers and got bored with them smoothing everything out, I had an 06 Enduro, an awesomely capable bike but got bored with it and I'm now loving having a big hardtail, I may get another full suss in the future just, i might not.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:20 pm
 rs
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

Can't be arsed to read this thread, but you're in Canada aren't you? Don't you have some bromance to kindle? Some brotography to develop? Or a brobecue to attend?

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mr Agreeable

Can't be arsed to read this thread, but you're in Canada aren't you? Don't you have some bromance to kindle? Some brotography to develop? Or a brobecue to attend?

Trying to imply that he's a bromosexual?


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Trying to imply that he's a bromosexual?

Obviously jealous of my many brodowns ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:27 pm
 ton
Posts: 24286
Full Member
 

the double diamond frame that has made up a bike frame has been around for 130ish years i think.
it will be around for a lot longer that that.
many many designs have tried and many have failed.
hence it's popularity with builders.
and in its strongest finest form as a hardtail.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Totally. Broseph.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:32 pm
Posts: 578
Free Member
 

Some of these posts are like the Father Ted episode where the salesman tries to sell Mrs Doyle a teasmade:

Salesman "but you won't have to go through all that suffering any more"

Mrs D "But I LIKE the suffering"


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:32 pm
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

I think he needs brotox.


 
Posted : 13/08/2009 11:36 pm
Page 2 / 4