Forum menu
Hardtail frame advi...
 

[Closed] Hardtail frame advice

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think his was bought in 2011 so not a new one.


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 11:27 am
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

Newer Chams are longer and slacker than the previous model. Nice looking bike.


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 11:49 am
Posts: 14170
Full Member
 

have you ridden a spitfire before you ordered? It won't dissapoint, I've been a serial bike changer for a while until I got mine, it's going no-where but my garage wall when it eventually cracks or snaps.... which in my experience all aluminium frames do eventually. Absolutely in a league of it's own.

The long story:

http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/what-slack-low-tough-140-160mm-full-sus-frame-forks-for-140mm-hardtail-rider

I was in the midst of arranging a testride when I tried a mate's new Whyte G150 and was really impressed with it. Looked up the geometry charts for both and the Spitfire was within a few mm and fraction of a degree, plus it would have a better fork, better shock, be stiffer and have more cunning rear suspension. Gut feeling said "buy!" so I did. Expecting it in a few weeks.

I'm hoping the Spitfire is sufficiently heavily built and I'm sufficiently smooth that it lasts a bloody long time! My last proper crash almost killed/paralysed me so I'm just going with the flow and keeping the risks low...


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 5:25 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Every time I see one of these I wonder if I should get it to replace my 456 SS due to the ability to take a good dropper post and a drop in weight... [img] [/img]


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 5:35 pm
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

Chilled - the carbon frames of the C456 is absolutely bombproof. The paint chips very easily though, o I would get the super raw one if you can.


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 5:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mmmbop's are a scary light frame and very capable with a 130/140mm fork. I never found mine harsh with 2.2" conti tyres, although the Blue Pig I have now rides better... and is therefore worth the pound weight penalty (IMHO etc).


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 2042
Full Member
 

I've had full suss for the last 14 years as a main bike but remember the good ol days when I rattled around on a '99 Zaskar LE. That was a hard and very direct ride.

Having bought a C456 frame and built it up with 140mm revs I would say it is nothing like as harsh as the older Zaskar and is a very nice to ride bike.

Before that I had the original Ragley Piglet frame and that was great downhill but rather dead feeling on anything other, and I also has one of the first Marley frames as a replacement from Hotlines when I sent the second Piglet frame back because of paint issues.

Never built the Marley up as I didn't have the right kit at the time, but I'd say it looked very substantially built and a world away from the previous Piglet.

Am still tempted by a Soul or something similar to give steel another chance, but ultimately I'm very happy with the C456 as a hardcore (ish) HT at a good weight.

I'm 17 stone and rattle down things quite hard. It hasn't complained once yet, so I don't think the OP has much to worry about strength wise.


 
Posted : 03/01/2014 5:50 pm
Page 2 / 2