Forum search & shortcuts

Guaranteed Death......
 

[Closed] Guaranteed Death.......

Posts: 2944
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#6779029]

.....and/or facial disfigurement, now available direct to you from ebay.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/161557565342


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:55 am
Posts: 10985
Free Member
 

Death is our only certainty.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:56 am
Posts: 10985
Free Member
 

Which on further investigation, seems likely to be premature!

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

FFS.....


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:58 am
Posts: 1473
Full Member
 

I can't think what reason anyone would have to do that... fatbike mod?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:01 am
Posts: 7637
Full Member
 

C'mon lets not been unfair. I mean whats the worst that could happen?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:06 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

are immaculate accept a scratch next to crown

Oh yes. They looks perfect.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:06 am
Posts: 1184
Free Member
 

good grief. Perfect working order you say?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wouldn't recommend doing enduro with them cus marzocchi standard bomber forks are meant for freerid only

Rampage only, obviously.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:10 am
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

**** me £85 bid? I'm sure I'd be lucky to get that for my unmodded Shermans (any takers?)


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:11 am
Posts: 1184
Free Member
 

I think the mod adds value?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:13 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

I think the mod adds value?

<Gets lump hammer and drill, heads to garage>


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:15 am
Posts: 6925
Free Member
 

When asked what the plate and bolts are for I got this reply

The upper crown of marzocchi are usually much wider like boxer forks and love the effect it gives therefore the titanium plate let's it have a wider angle
😯
Looks like aluminium to me..


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:41 am
Posts: 12809
Free Member
 

chambord - Member

I can't think what reason anyone would have to do that... fatbike mod?

Somewhere on the listing he mentions Manitou - being that that bridge doesn't have the 'M' of a Marz bridge I'm going to say the following thought process happened...

"Oh shit, I've destroyed the lowers on my Marz forks"

"but it's okay, because I have a set of Manitou lowers in the shed"

"Oh dear, they don't appear to be wide enough"

"Vera!!! have you seen my hacksaw?"


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:49 am
Posts: 7637
Full Member
 

So the extra holes?

Are they:

A: A really clever way to save weight
B: A indication that he made more than one attempt at bolting the fork together
C: A way of guaranteeing the lowers will fail catastrophically


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:53 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Somewhere on the listing he mentions Manitou

Also note the scraped-off decal on the lowers.

Stanchions look to be in excellent nick though, so well worth it.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:57 am
Posts: 13542
Full Member
 

P-Jay, this is my conclusion as well, a brilliantly engineered solution I'm sure all will agree.

Richmtb, B with a side of C included.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:57 am
Posts: 44000
Full Member
 

[quote=richmtb ]So the extra holes?
Are they:
A: A really clever way to save weight
B: A indication that he made more than one attempt at bolting the fork together
C: A way of guaranteeing the lowers will fail catastrophically
D: Couldn't afford enough "titanium" to make the plate as wide as he first thought.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:58 am
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

Love the fact that it's not even mentioned in the condition or description.
Good old ebay.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:59 am
Posts: 2944
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Maybe he saw [url= http://singletrackworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/magura-engineers-diy-fatbike-fork/ ]this[/url] and thought he could do something similar but with [s]a much lower level of[/s] no expertise.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:02 am
Posts: 54
Free Member
 

this is why I love STW, always something here to put a smile on my face


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:02 am
Posts: 1048
Free Member
 

I'm intrigued by the tyre rub on the inside of the arch. "Flexy" springs to mind.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:02 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Nah. I think there may be a slight dish problem in his wheel. In fact, that's some impressive clearance his mod has left him. 🙂


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:05 am
Posts: 1048
Free Member
 

Nah. I think there may be a slight dish problem in his wheel.
Wow.

I don't know why, but despite the quality engineering, the word "stiction" is now springing to mind.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:08 am
 Drac
Posts: 50643
 

I think the mod adds value?

It's got nothing to do with us.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:10 am
 iolo
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

At least he says they're not for Enduro.
Freeride only on these forks.
Perfect for some North Shore 10ft to flat or even the next Red Bull Rampage.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:10 am
Posts: 2944
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Not sure that frame he's had them on is meant to have that much travel either.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:16 am
Posts: 1048
Free Member
 

I wouldn't worry northernmatt, he's probably sawed the frame in half and spaced it out somehow.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hypothetical question; what if someone with no knowledge of bikes or forks bought them and seriously injured themselves?
Considering that the seller is stating that they're original and safe, and suitable for freeride; could he be liable?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:24 am
Posts: 3689
Full Member
 

apart from my first impression of WT actual F, where did the 'zocchi thing even come from?

Those stantions looks like Manitou (they've got 'Hayes' etched into the top of them) and the sliders are reverse arch like Manitou so what part of them are actually Marzocchi?

And if they're both Manitou why is there such a big gap???

I'm really confused.

😯 😕 😯


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:27 am
Posts: 3689
Full Member
 

Even more confused now - just noticed the 'M' in the crown, so why the Hayes branding on the stantions... 😕 😉


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:29 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Hypothetical question; what if someone with no knowledge of bikes or forks bought them and seriously injured themselves?

They could own him with [s]half[/s] a third of a bomber, I suppose.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Pinkster - Member
apart from my first impression of WT actual F, where did the 'zocchi thing even come from?

Those stantions looks like Manitou (they've got 'Hayes' etched into the top of them) and the sliders are reverse arch like Manitou so what part of them are actually Marzocchi?

The Hayes thing is a sticker. You can see the edge in one of the pics. Bodes well when everything else looks so pro.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:41 am
 lerk
Posts: 185
Free Member
 

I like the small detail that he uses nyloc nuts, but the screws aren't long enough to meet the nylon!


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:41 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

The Hayes thing is a sticker Shirley. Just like he appears to have a Thomson one on the other leg.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 11:46 am
Posts: 7637
Full Member
 

"perfect working order"

Well that's one way to describe them

I'm also pretty sure those are shill bids


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 2:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A Gem.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 2:51 pm
Posts: 17302
Full Member
 

Do you reckon he could convert my 26 forks to 29?
TF need to snap him up before someone else does.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 2:54 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

SNap I see what you did there

As others say WTF goes through someone s mind to both do that then [ considerign the dish and tyre rub] consider it a success and fit for sale


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 3:00 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

FFS that advert going to take some beating (unlike the forks) so many levels of wrong.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 3:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Did he not realise that when he split the lowers the hub of the wheels would not longer fit properly as there would be a gap?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 3:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought it was a Go Pro mount in order to film his own suicide


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 3:26 pm
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

I think all it needs is a lower plate. That part is just a fork brace, and it seems to have a through axle.

I rode motorbikes with much less bracing than that on rough roads, and at far higher speeds than that will ever see.

I would do the same, just tidier, and with a stiffer interconnection.

There's nought wrong with his idea, just the execution IMO.

Edit:

Here's one I prepared earlier with no brace at all (when it was hard to buy fatbike forks)

[url= https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4099/4907146688_4bb04b7809_b.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4099/4907146688_4bb04b7809_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 3:41 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

There was a engineer a while back for Marzocchi (iirc) that cut a fork in half and widened the brace to fit on a fat bike. Cannot for the life of me find it now but his solution was a lot more thought out than that one!


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 5:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Would duct tape work then? I have no metal plates available... 😆


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 5:48 pm
Page 1 / 2