Forum menu
Gopping or Art? (ca...
 

[Closed] Gopping or Art? (caution! clash of wheel diameters inside)

Posts: 24440
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#5007220]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 12:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like it, but it is but a reprint of a past master:

[img] [/img]

http://ewrbikes.com/owb_specs


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 12:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gopping indeed


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 12:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And they have missed a shock off the back as well


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 12:33 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

The bastard son of a clothes horse and a penny-farthing.

Those extra frame tubes are pointless, and not in a good GT, Jones or cruiser/towel rail way either.

Uglier than a hatful of monkey's arseholes.


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 12:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The first one is an utterly gopping mish-mash of random angles. The second pic is better because of the straight line of the toptube/seatstay. I don't really like either though. Not Art!!


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 12:36 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

I have a history of ugly bikes. I still wouldn't let that in the garage.


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 12:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think my eyes are bleeding


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 12:52 am
Posts: 2448
Full Member
 

I would consider it if it was a 29er rear 36er front.


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 1:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'll say one thing for it, the different wheel sizes are far less offensive than on a less ugly bike.


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 1:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

for some reason they remind me of them poxy folding bikes. more so for the white one.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 1:10 am
 IHN
Posts: 20128
Full Member
 

I like it.


 
Posted : 28/03/2013 9:37 am