Forum menu
Good lord, that...
 

[Closed] Good lord, that's ugly

Posts: 14932
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#2815963]

A little bit of sick in my mouth at the sight of this

http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/news/article/specialized-fate-mountain-bike-launched-30447

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Special bike for a special person


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A little bit of sick in my mouth at the sight of this

Yup.

Can understand that...

Its FUGLY... ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

Almost make the On One Carbon 456 look good.

[i]Almost[/i]..


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:16 pm
Posts: 2889
Full Member
 

My c456 is gorgeous, i'll have you know.

That thing, on the other hand...


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It gives the impression (to me) that geometry has been compromised to accommodate large wheels.


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:19 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

S-Works?.....not in this case.


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Proves it's not just men that care about having more inches. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

blurb on the link suggest geometry compromised to allow short people (women are people too) to ride clown bikes without banging their tootsies on the stupidly large front wheel (toe overlap).


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A Fate worse than death? :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

buzz-lightyear - Member
It gives the impression (to me) that geometry has been compromised to accommodate large wheels.

You can pretty much apply that to most 29ers ๐Ÿ˜‰

650B all the way!


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks ok... For a spesh


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:28 pm
 j_me
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

*Dry Boak


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:31 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I've seen worse....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Mental Mickey - Member
Proves it's not just men that care about having more niches.

FTFY

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

agghhhhh my eyes!!!!

that's bloody awful looking
and if you hadn't guessed I like my 29ers ^ ๐Ÿ™„

almost looks like one one of those stupid 36ers

29inches where 29inches makes sense, not for the sake of please
I think mine at least look in proportion to me and its self

[url= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2735/4225617350_cd81c1e469.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2735/4225617350_cd81c1e469.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/krharris80/4225617350/ ]Niner Build[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/krharris80/ ]KeithHarris[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 4:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CaptainFlashheart - Member
Mental Mickey - Member
Proves it's not just men that care about having more niches.
FTFY

Inches -> Niches

I see what you did there. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 5:02 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

That's why they pay me the big bucks on tour....

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 5:03 pm
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

is it made of melted wellies?


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 5:05 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

I like it and as long as it's as fast a hell, who cares if some lardy weekend warriors are offended by it. ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 7:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Without meaning to drag up the whole 'why 29er' thing again - that bike has blatently been built just for the sake of it! Who would buy a 15" one of those? Plonkers, thats who.

29er Keith has is right - tall folk on 26ers look awkward, same as minime on a 29er - it's all about scale.

And its fugly.


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 7:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've seen worse....

What d'you have to go and do that for?

[img] [/img]

Flashy; are you available for bar mitzvahs?


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 8:15 pm
Posts: 9597
Free Member
 

buzz-lightyear - Member
It gives the impression (to me) that geometry has been compromised to accommodate large wheels

or, to accommodate fixed fork design.


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 8:21 pm
Posts: 6126
Full Member
 

buzz-lightyear - Member

It gives the impression (to me) that geometry has been compromised to accommodate large wheels.


Well quite. There's a reason why kids' first bikes tend not to have 29" wheels, for example...


 
Posted : 03/06/2011 8:25 pm