Forum menu
Going 2x10 - Conve...
 

[Closed] Going 2x10 - Convert m970 or buy new cranks?

 gp
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#4654390]

Hi - wanting to go 2x10..Would you convert a xtr m970 crank (with Turbine or TA rings etc)or buy a specific 2x10 chainset?

I could sell the m970 to cover a good chunk of the cost. But are there advantages to using a specific 2x10 crankset?

The XTR cranks are obviously a nice bit kit (and are in good nic) so there wouldnt be any or much of a weight saving to be made by changing them. But I'm just trying to figure out if the converted setup would be at all less preferable, for whatever reason (chainline, shifting performance etc I guess?)

Thanks


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Convert, no need to do anything at the front other than sort out the ring size choice.


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 12:24 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Convert. M8x2mm washers needed to offset the inner ring, otherwise it's fine. This was mine with 28/40 TA rings:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 12:29 pm
 kevj
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for convert.

You have good crank arms already and once you swap out the chainrings and have a few differing sizes, you are able to pick and choose ratios to suit anticipated rides.


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 12:33 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Do people actually do that?


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 12:37 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

Why, what are you actually going to save and/or gain?

I'd just stay with the 3x9. And have you seen how much 10-spd cassettes weigh?


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 12:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

b r - Member
Why, what are you actually going to save and/or gain?

Can't speak for the OP but gaining a clutch mech was the biggest benefit of going to 10 speed fo me. I dropped the big ring because I never used it and the 11-32 10 speed cassette gets rid of the step in the middle of the 9 speed cassette. I went with 36-22 up front.


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 12:48 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

And ratios that better suited my riding style was what I gained from going for a double. 22t was too small to be of any use, 44t slightly too big, somewhere in the middle... perfect.


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 12:49 pm
 gp
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I am keen to change because I don't use the big ring either and new ratios should stop so much shifting the front rings (hopefully). A clutch mech sound great too. I was interested to see if a dedicated 2x10 chainset might have other benefits such as chainline, q-factor, neither of which I know much about - but just to weigh it all up..

Thanks for the replies.. Am keen on keeping the cranks as they are nice!


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 1:05 pm
 Alex
Posts: 7690
Full Member
 

2x10 works for me. Just bought a clutch mech after the chain attempting to leave the building about a million times on very rocky terrain. Which is why I also bought a stinger ๐Ÿ˜‰ Got to say even living in Malverns where it's pretty steep, 2x10 is fine. Never used the big ring other than as a bash/tension the chain.

Bought new with a new bike so easy to justify over 9. still got 9spd on the HT tho.


 
Posted : 15/12/2012 1:19 pm