Forum menu
getting used to rd ...
 

[Closed] getting used to rd bike braking

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Those Swissstop ones are good but pricey

I found the Kool Stop Salmon ones a vast improvement to the standard Shimano 105 OEMs

http://www.wiggle.co.uk/kool-stop-dura-aceultegra105-pair-of-cartridge-inserts/


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 1:23 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Retarding force ๐Ÿ˜†

What brake/rim are you using? They should be seriously good. Using another racing situation to put it in perspective. When the bunch is hooning downhill all trying to be the first into the bend there's never any problems. You even get a massive cloud of brake dust thrown up.....which made me go Woooo when I first saw it happen.


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 1:25 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]Seriously. When I grab my brakes I expect at least a moderate amount of retarding force. I am not making this up for the hell of it. And yes I've cleaned the rims, tried different pads, sanded the glaze off etc etc. [/i]

You're doing something wrong then, go see what a shop says about it. Lots of people on road bikes ride really fast and feel that their brakes are capable of stopping them in a reasonable distance.


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 1:29 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

almost all mountainbike "enthusiasts" these days feel they "need" to have disc brakes on their mountain bike no matter how lame the terrain it's going to be ridden on turning most of them into a bunch of pussies. same with longer travel trail bikes.

the only retarding force is the rider..


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 2:03 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

Anyone who wants to confirm their non-pussy status I have some XT/XTR Vs and some magura hydro rim brakes for sale ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 2:15 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

You're doing something wrong then

Like what? Last time this came up btw a lot of people also complained about 105 brakes.

feel that their brakes are capable of stopping them in a reasonable distance feel that their brakes are capable of stopping them in a reasonable distance

And I don't - in the wet. Maybe my standards have been progressively raised since M-System and then discs were invented but the brakes on my road bike in the rain will NOT stop me quickly enough in an emergency. That's a fact.

Why? I'd love to know. Either you have different brakes, have different standards, don't ride in solid rain or you depend on avoiding things rather than stopping, rollerblader style.

I got used to stopping on 6d on my MTB, so I feel like I'd like to do this on a road bike too.


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 2:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyone wants to confirm their pussy status status I've got some Hayes So1e in my garage waiting for a new home, mind you, if you've ever used them in anger you probably not that much of a pussy. They are worse than dual pivots! ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 2:28 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Like what? Last time this came up btw a lot of people also complained about 105 brakes
He told you (other than being one of many pussies)
go see what a shop says about it.

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 2:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

105 brakes are OK - It's what I have
As above though, they were greatly improved with the Koolstop pads


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 6757
Free Member
 

I've got disc brakes on my road bike with full mudguards and a rack and it makes it sssooo much better for year round commuting. When its raining really hard, rim brakes just don't work. If someone pulls out on you, you're stuffed. it doesn't matter how carefully you ride, unexpected stuff can always happen.

A road bike tyre has more grip than a mtb tyre in many situations too, locking up wheels just doesn't happen (unless you want it to).

having said all this, my road bike would probably be considered a "tourer" but i can't be bothered trying to work out what niche its in.

If its got drops and slicks its a road bike!


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 2:38 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

it makes it sssooo much better for year round commuting

No it doesn't! You LIE! LIE!


 
Posted : 05/04/2011 2:42 pm
Page 2 / 2