Forum menu
FAT v's THIN
 

[Closed] FAT v's THIN

Posts: 17778
Full Member
 

I rode a non fatbike yesterday for the first time in ages.
It was ok apart from it made me crash three times on the way home from the pub.

It was definitly the bikes fault. Nothing to do with the Ciderhouse Special I'd been drinking. Think i'll stick with the fatbike from now on. It's much safer.


 
Posted : 13/05/2012 10:20 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How do you the cameraman was on two wheels and not one
I reckon he was nose manualing, the guy's sick! 8)


 
Posted : 13/05/2012 10:45 am
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

FAT won !!

did the Vale of Belvior bike ride for the BHF today

40 miles, with husker du tyres runnning 18psi

steady plod, but managed a top speed of 48.5 mph !


 
Posted : 13/05/2012 5:29 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12651
Free Member
 

48.5mph on tractor tyres!

Deaf much? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 13/05/2012 5:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The cameraman is a ****ing riding god. He was doing a big long stoppie while filming.


 
Posted : 13/05/2012 9:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Missed this thread ๐Ÿ™‚
There is indeed now much interest in fat bikes,
If there better or not than regular bikes outwith the enviroment they were designed for is up to the rider and what he gets out of riding a bike.

Off the beaten track they are a lot of fun in the enviroment they were designed for providing massive grip and often will out ride your own ability ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/05/2012 11:50 pm
Page 3 / 3