Forum menu
Ebikes and suspensi...
 

[Closed] Ebikes and suspension query

Posts: 36
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#8309293]

Ebikes are equipped with standard suspension components, they are not any different to a human propelled bike.

Given that the average full suspension ebike will be in the region of say 21 kilo, and a "normal" full suss bike will be say 13 kilo.

Is there scope for increasing the pressure settings for both the forks and rear shock?

When the same weight rider sits on either bike, the same pressure will yield the correct sag measurement.

But in practice, the ebike will have a greater mass hitting the same obstacle.

So, the sag may be correct in a static situation, but entirely different in the dynamic trail riding conditions?

Or am I overthinking this ?


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 8:00 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

8kg on the bike sounds like typical rider weight variation tome. Might be distributed a little differently, but not much
Unless you are planning to market bike specific suspension for a suitable premium?


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 8:03 pm
Posts: 2367
Free Member
 

You are over thinking it.

7kg difference, that's just the difference between a 12 stone rider or an 11 stone rider. (near enough)


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 8:04 pm
Posts: 17780
Full Member
 

You are over thinking it.

Is this why Fox are offering an Ebike specific 36 that's stiffer than a standard 36?


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 8:16 pm
Posts: 2367
Free Member
 

Go on, enlighten me.

How does the fork know the difference between a 21kg bike and a 79kg rider, or a 13kg bike and an 87kg rider?

Or could it be marketing bollocks?


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 8:32 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Umm, it's not an insignificant difference though.

In terms of weight, you could say the major manufacturers have a window of settings, but the difference here is the mass and inertia of the impacts.

I'm not proposing an answer here, it just strikes me that the impact of a bike that weighs about 7 kilo more, will have an impact on the way the suspension works.

So, sitting on the bike will give sag values, but once it is in the trail the force and impact will be greater due to the added inertia?

Dunno, is this correct?


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 9:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Or could it be marketing bollocks?

Not in mountain biking, I simply won't hear it!


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 9:18 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thinking about it a bit more, albeit with an alcohol infused condition, the manufacturer of the fork or shock, will take a rider weight and bike in their algorithm in the design of the fork.

Hence, the air settings are a compromise.

But these settings will be determined on a normal mountain bike.

But, for an ebike with full suss this will be outside of the normal parameters by quite a margin, given a normal(ish) rider weight and normal(ish) bike weight.

Similar in principle to how sram have developed a new gear system (EX1) for the extra torque available from the battery assist in terms of drive systems.

Speaking without any real suspension knowledge, perhaps a larger air volume space would be the answer?


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 9:28 pm
Posts: 1526
Full Member
 

Probably more scope for additional damping from the extra torque than any really need to increase the spring rate


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 9:31 pm
Posts: 44799
Full Member
 

The riders weight moves around and you use your arms and legs as additional suspension. Ebike the weight is dead weight. I guess that makes a bit of a difference but not a huge amount


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 9:39 pm
Posts: 17780
Full Member
 

How does the fork know the difference between a 21kg bike and a 79kg rider, or a 13kg bike and an 87kg rider?

It doesn't...
It's just stiffer and maybe a tad more weighty.

Here's the real shocker. Some people are putting the Ebike fork on a none Ebike. ๐Ÿ˜›
That must confuse it to ****.


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 9:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

o on, enlighten me.

How does the fork know the difference between a 21kg bike and a 79kg rider, or a 13kg bike and an 87kg rider?

Or could it be marketing bollocks?

doesn`t work like that though does it, if the average rider weight is 80kg then on average the ebike + rider is still heavier.

Its not like only people who are light ride ebikes, probably the opposite if we are honest.


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 9:45 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Umm, I'm not your typical ebike rider then.

I'm about 81 kilo, I ride because I have a bit of a strength issue, I wouldn't say all ebike riders are a bit heavier though.

I'm just more concerned about how the standard fork fits or operates on a heavier mass bike.

The impact on medium to large impacts must have a greater impact in terms of dynamics?

The compression / rebound control could be he answer here, but these settings are very rider dependent.

This is more of a conversation topic, than a defitive answer by the way.

I used to have a BMW R1100S, and can't help thinking that an anti dive shock with a single shock absorber might be the answer here. The weight penalty on an ebike is not really an issue.


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 10:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wouldn't say all ebike riders are a bit heavier though.

not all, some are average size weight but on average they are definitely on the larger end of the scale compared to an average of normal mtb riders. I spent the last few years selling them and that is just my own observation.


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 10:15 pm
Posts: 349
Free Member
 

As far as I know my ebike (specialized levo fsr), the shock comes with a tune that's geared more toward ebikes. It comes with the specialized autosag thing so it's just got whatever psi that deems right. Dunno about the fork, think they just say to shove a couple more psi in it - mine is just at what feels good. I'm ~67kg.


 
Posted : 28/01/2017 10:38 pm