Forum search & shortcuts

[Closed] Di2 XT

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah makes sense you need either or can use both. Cheers.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 10:29 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

how much of a difference in shifing is there?

Id be tempted with bad thumbs crashes have meant I'm happy on grip shift these days.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 10:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

IIRC the latest road groupsets (shimano) are now pretty much weight neutral. Veering towards electronic being lighter.

Same story with EPS and Etap.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 10:29 am
Posts: 8916
Full Member
 

As above and mentioned earlier, if I was still using a front shifter I'd be really excited by Di2 heading towards my price range. These days I'm so in love with 1X all I see is the hassle of charging and little benefit. The 11-46 cassette doesn't do anything a SRAM 10-42 hasn't covered already except add weight


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 10:32 am
Posts: 24446
Full Member
 

Anyway, my rear mech is knackered so need a new one. When is 11sp SLX actually out?


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 10:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also does anyone know the weight differnece between mechanical and electronic? I imagine electronic is heavier?

I thought this when XTR DI2 came out, but it's the same or lighter than mechanical overall. I would imagine the same is true of XT (but could be wrong).

XTR DI2 (2x) is therefore on my lottery XC race bike spec. Apparently the shifting is a bit better, but as others have said the real benefit comes from being able to run front mechs with one shifter.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 10:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What happens if your bike takes a dip in the canal...is all the electronics ****ed?
How waterproof is it?


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 1:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Very.

Cross bikes running Di2 get jet washed.
No problems.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 1:51 pm
Posts: 628
Free Member
 

Do the rear mechs auto trim like the fronts do...or have I made the whole auto trim thing up? If electronic keeps shifting spot on during the cruddy winter months then I'd be tempted by this, especially as I'm really bad at being bothered to fine tune my gears so they're always set up perfectly. 😳


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 3:11 pm
Posts: 10637
Full Member
 

I've been using Di2 on my commuter for (Alfine) for 18 months and 10000 miles. It's perfect. my previous mechanical Alfine 11 gave me nothing but trouble due to cable tension.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 3:14 pm
Posts: 2599
Free Member
 

It should in theory be possible to swap the wireless mech, battery and shifter pretty rapidly between bikes. All you need is a different chain with a quick link, and a QR method of attaching/removing the battery. Could save a fair bit of cash there.

I'll definitlety be getting XT Di2 when it's wireless. My 11-42 Sram cassette has all the range I need. The 11-46t might just be worth it for big days. I rarely spend time in 42 anyway.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 3:16 pm
Posts: 625
Full Member
 

Rocketdog it's June/July for new slx


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 3:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Going to be a long time before Di2 goes wireless IMO.

It should in theory be possible to swap the wireless mech, battery and shifter pretty rapidly between bikes.

You can swap those components pretty rapidly without going wireless, just unplug them from the Di2 wiring loom.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 3:33 pm
Posts: 12809
Free Member
 

Ah, not for me - I haven't really gotten over destroying 3x £100 derailleurs in a week yet (7 years and the mental scars haven't healed) so I won't be putting any £300 derailleurs in harms way, but mostly because my mechanical 1x11 XT system works utterly beautifully. I'm sue d12 is crisper still and all that, but it still won't completely stop the chain hoping off my narrow/wide now and again and that's my biggest issue at the moment.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 3:43 pm
Posts: 10637
Full Member
 

What you really want is two batteries and a single wireless system.

The seatpost battery with it's brain and wireless receiver/sender can be connected to the mechs (and later the rear disc brake). A smaller battery (inside the stem) with a similar brain and sender/receiver to power the shifters/display (and later the front disc brake) etc. these two are then paired. This means all cables are short and neat (front and rear) , large frame tubes don't need drilling for ANY routing (not even for hydraulics) just a small hole in the seat-tube for the front mech and in the chainstay for the rear. Mechs and shifters can be slim and neat and brakes can be self contained units. T'is the future.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 3:49 pm
Posts: 3837
Full Member
 

The rear mech is £225, so not cheap, but pretty good value compared to other mechanical options out there.

Thisisnotaspoon - 11-42 gaps are smaller as a percentage increase/decrease, and also more even than 10-42. The addition of 2x option with that range increases overall range while maintaining (rather than improving obviously) the neater ratio gaps. You've still got the 10-42 option if cadence management rather than ultimate range is more important to you.

2x (28/38 for example) with 11-40 is a 492% range
10-42 is 420% range, so a significantly smaller range, but with lumpier ratio jumps. An 11-42 cassette (with 28/38) would increase ratio jumps from the 24T sprocket upwards, but also increase range to 518%.
Either way gives you better range and closer available ratios than 1x with 10-42, and better chainlink through the range.

The fact that the synchro shift option allows you to ride it essentially as a 1x set up, means that to me, there is a point.

Also - the synchro shift is flexible - you chose the shift mapping (as well as shift speed, button function etc etc).


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 7:03 pm
Posts: 8846
Full Member
 

Di2 on my commuter for (Alfine)

Does Alfine Di2 use eTube? Can it be used with drop bar or fireboat shifters?


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 9:06 pm
Posts: 0
 

Yes Alfine uses the etube software, set mine the other day to do multiple shifts on prolonged holding off the shift levers. Been very impressed with the alfine di2. One bonus is you can use ultegra 11 with an xtr rear mech so great for cyclocross, so now a cheaper rear mech to use.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 9:11 pm
Posts: 10637
Full Member
 

ratherbeintobago - Member
Does Alfine Di2 use eTube? Can it be used with drop bar or fireboat shifters?

It does. Mines a right hodgepodge (of the highest caliber) consisting of R785 road shifters, XTR M9020 callipers, and a 36h Alfine 11 hub.

DI2 is the ONLY was to run Alfine 11 IMO.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 10:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So an Alfine rear hub like [url= https://www.rosebikes.co.uk/article/shimano-alfine-di2-sg-s705-gear-hub/aid:581819?channable=e8467.NTgxODE5&gclid=CJrVztbTkcwCFbYV0wodl40HeA ]this 11 speed one[/url], a Di2 shifter, junction box, battery, job done? That'd be quite nice.


 
Posted : 15/04/2016 11:09 pm
Posts: 10637
Full Member
 

You also need the motor unit for the hub and I also use a display for pimp and quick charging.


 
Posted : 16/04/2016 8:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can the new 11-46 cassette be used with existing xt 1x11 2016? I'm assuming the chain and teeth profile on the chainset remains the same so shouldn't be an issue..?

When's the cassette meant to be available?


 
Posted : 18/04/2016 4:58 pm
Posts: 41938
Free Member
 

Thisisnotaspoon - 11-42 gaps are smaller as a percentage increase/decrease, and also more even than 10-42. The addition of 2x option with that range increases overall range while maintaining (rather than improving obviously) the neater ratio gaps. You've still got the 10-42 option if cadence management rather than ultimate range is more important to you.

2x (28/38 for example) with 11-40 is a 492% range
10-42 is 420% range, so a significantly smaller range, but with lumpier ratio jumps. An 11-42 cassette (with 28/38) would increase ratio jumps from the 24T sprocket upwards, but also increase range to 518%.
Either way gives you better range and closer available ratios than 1x with 10-42, and better chainlink through the range.

My point was that a 22-42 bottom gear is pointless, there's barely enough momentum to balance in 22-32. Hence my point that shimano probably didn't state that you could go 2x with 11-42 because they assumed no one would ever want to. If you're going to set it up to auto/syncro shift the front mech then surely you'd stick with an 11-34 (or thereabouts) cassette and the biggest shiftable jump at the front (22-36 or so, same 14t difference as road bikes?). Giving a practical set of gears and small jumps.

11-34 and 22-36 gives 511%, almost the same range as your biggest example, with much closer gears.

In your example the lowest gear was 28-42, which is just a very heavy version of 22-34.


 
Posted : 18/04/2016 5:19 pm
Posts: 3837
Full Member
 

I'd agree 22x42 is a pointless ratio, but 22T isn't an option. It's 24/34, 26/36, 28/38.

Cassette options are 11-40, 11-42 or the 1x 11-46.

It uses the same cassettes and chainsets as mechanical XT (just as with all their other Di2 groups), and so it has a range increase in the cassette, and a range reduction at the front - gives a similar range as 11-34 22-36 as you say, but in mechanical guise it means that a front shift is closer to a rear shift in terms of ratio gain/loss, so a front shift doesn't require a recovery shift at the rear to achieve the ratio change you want, as you tend to find in typical 2x set ups due to the large difference in chainring tooth counts.
In Di2 guise, it makes less difference, as you'd let synchro take control. Either way it's better in real world use.

Cassette gaps on 11-34 10 spd and 11-40/42 11 spd are surprisingly close - first 7 sprockets are the same size.

My preference is 11-40 on a double, and 11-42 is fine for my riding on a single, but nice to have further options!


 
Posted : 18/04/2016 8:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think at the ripe old age of 28, I might be turning into a total neck-bearded retrogrouch...

Do we really want to pollute the beautiful mechanical purity of the bicycle with batteries and led displays and wifi?

Philosophically, I don't feel ok with Di2. I know I don't have to buy it, and I won't. But I worry that in 10, 15 years or whatever there won't be any good quality normal mechanical gear systems. For what it's worth, I ride a full sus 1x10 "enduro" bike, so it's not like I'm a single speed whiskey swilling sandal wearer. But still. Sorry for my grouchitude!


 
Posted : 18/04/2016 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In 10 - 15 years time you'll be reminiscing about how you were wrong about Di2 and how Di4 is completely unnecessary 🙂


 
Posted : 18/04/2016 9:12 pm
Posts: 3188
Full Member
 

i am new to di2 on the road bike , only had it 2 weeks , but it is great .

would definetly consider it for the mtb if i was going back to a double at the front .


 
Posted : 18/04/2016 9:17 pm
Page 2 / 2