Forum search & shortcuts

Dan Roan v Lance Ar...
 

[Closed] Dan Roan v Lance Armstrong Interview on BBC1 at 11:30pm (Sunday 1/2/15)

Posts: 5299
Free Member
 

I for one can't stand SAF. He may have been successful but he came across as being thoroughly dislikeable!


 
Posted : 02/02/2015 5:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They did but I would suggest that they didn't directly have the effect that LA did. You're right of course that the doctors and team managers had a major part to play but for me that's really where most of the blame lies rather than with the majority of riders themselves - not to excuse them but IMO they weren't the ones with the power. To that point, I'd happily see Riis, Vino and probably more to the point, the doctors and team managers of the time banned from team management.

Lance was an exception to that. He clearly had significant influence in a way that most riders didn't. That's why he deserves his lifetime ban.


 
Posted : 02/02/2015 5:15 pm
Posts: 1172
Free Member
 

AlexSimon - Member
Yes, you're missing the fact that it's Lance that wants to be back in the public eye and back competing.
If he just quietly went away with his remaining multi-millions it wouldn't be so bad.

That and the fact that when he was on the ropes, he came out dirtier than ever, with hate campaigns against the USADA prosecutors, threats and, because everyone already knew the truth at that point and were watching closely, he made his personality very very clear to everyone.


I see it the same way. He was the figurehead of that whole scene and ruthlessly lied and bullied people so deserves to be hung out to dry.
He is the one seeking to get back in the public eye so is opening himself to scrutiny.
The only way he would regain any credibility in my eyes would be to come clean and tell all like Tyler Hamilton, but even so I wouldn't want to see him hosting TV coverage like other ex-pros.


 
Posted : 02/02/2015 5:58 pm
Page 2 / 2