Forum menu
Cyclists who kill p...
 

Cyclists who kill pedestrians could face tougher sentences

Posts: 4097
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#12493889]

So article on the Beeb with Grant Shaps saying that cyclists do not face tough enough sentences when killing pedestrians.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-62444889

Am I missing something but doesn't manslaughter cover this off already? Also why aim for this particular scenario? Figure 3 on the page below shows a total of 0 pedestrians killed by cyclists and lots of cyclists killed.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-road-user-risk/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-road-user-risk-2020-data#other-road-users-killed-in-collisions-by-colliding-vehicle-type---numbers-and-rates

In fact you'll note it states, in relation to chart 4...

Very few other road users are killed in collisions with pedal cyclists or pedestrians (5 and 0 respectively in 2020).

Now this is only for 2020 but does seem as though Grant is at best attempting to pass a pointless law, at worst vilify cyclists.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 7:29 am
Posts: 9222
Free Member
 

Tories have no doubt decided or discovered that most cyclists don't vote Tory.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 7:38 am
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

And that a lot of tories (along with most other people) hate cyclists. Not many are going to be against the idea. They won't be interested in the data or how really, really insignificant it is they will still back the idea.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 7:43 am
Posts: 20986
 

He said it will "impress on cyclists the real harm they can cause when speed is combined with lack of care".

Expect laws regarding speed limits for bikes.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 7:52 am
Posts: 7751
Free Member
 

DM front page article opens with words 'killer cyclists..'
No, I don't read that excuse for a paper; daily front pages are part of my newsfeed.
It's clickbait; irresponsible drivel intended to appeal to those who are already prejudiced against cyclists and the hard of thinking.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 7:53 am
Posts: 20669
Full Member
 

On the very rare occasions cyclists kill pedestrians, they already tend to get far harsher penalties than drivers.

This is just more populist clickbait, the last desperate throes of the worst Government we've ever had.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 7:58 am
Posts: 9606
Free Member
 

Populist ****s.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 8:28 am
Posts: 9606
Free Member
 

Maybe an attempted distraction from

Rishi Sunak tells Tory members of his work diverting public funds from ‘deprived urban areas’

Tory leadership contender Rishi Sunak has told Conservative party members he had been working to divert funding from “deprived urban areas” towards more prosperous towns.

The former chancellor said he had started changing public funding formulas to ensure more prosperous towns receive “the funding they deserve”.

The New Statesman magazine, which obtained video revealing Mr Sunak’s remarks, said they were made to grassroots Tories in Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent, on July 29, as part of his campaigning for the Tory leadership.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 8:45 am
Posts: 4710
Free Member
 

Tories have no doubt decided or discovered that most cyclists don’t vote Tory.

That about sums it up. Play to their core, sod everyone else.

On the very rare occasions cyclists kill pedestrians, they already tend to get far harsher penalties than drivers.

This. If you want to kill someone then doing it using a car in an 'accident' is the easiest and the most penalty-free way of doing it.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 8:54 am
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

So long as car/lorry drivers who kill many cyclists every year with a weapon get equally suitable sentences -5-10 years in the jail. Prisons will soon be over loaded.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 8:55 am
Posts: 6642
Full Member
 

Have you read the FB comments on the recent highway code changes? The Karens/Tory voters are gonna love this.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 9:02 am
Posts: 13496
Full Member
 

That is a pathetically weak story and very poor journalism. Where was the challenge - how many cases in the last 10 years could Shapps cite a person (who was riding a bike at the time) who kills another person being given a sentence of 'only' two years where the judge would have prefered to give a longer one if possible?

This is presumably just a virtual reach around for your typical Daily Mail comment writer. Tory ****ing politicians and, even worse, tory ****ing voters that they are giving a leg trembler to.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 9:09 am
Posts: 4438
Full Member
 

From what I recall, pretty much every case of a cyclist causing a fatal accident thats come to trial has lead to them receiving a significant custodial sentence.

If the same level of judicial rigor was being applied to drivers I'd be fairly sanguine about it, but since so many of them get away with a slap on the wrist this does come across as pure red meat for the Daily Mail crowd and bugger all to do with any actual real world problems.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 9:24 am
 rsl1
Posts: 799
Free Member
 

It's ok guys just tell them you need your bike for work and you'll be on your way home with just a fine in no time


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 9:49 am
Posts: 35100
Full Member
 

desperate headline grab by man in fear of his job come September.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 9:50 am
Posts: 33213
Full Member
 

I'm quite happy to get equal punishment in order to get equal rights and respect.

The article maybe needed figures for the number of people killed by cyclists each year versus the number killed by drivers.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 9:52 am
Posts: 35100
Full Member
 

3 people killed by cyclists, 112 cyclists killed by drivers, last year alone. About 1850 drivers killed by other drivers every year.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 10:02 am
Posts: 4438
Full Member
 

So they are frustrated that cyclists 'only' get a max of 2 years in prison.

And yet, killing a cyclist while over the speed limit, on your phone, uninsured and stoned out of your tree only gets you 21 months.

https://road.cc/content/news/drug-driver-sentenced-21-months-killing-cyclist-295005

So yup, a terrible government delivering terrible policies to pander to the terrible misinformed prejudices of the most terrible people in the country in a desperate bid to distract from the fact they have no idea how to solve any actual problems facing us.

Great


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 10:07 am
 Bez
Posts: 7441
Full Member
 

That is a pathetically weak story and very poor journalism.

That depends whether you see journalism as:
(a) a process by which factual information is diligently discovered, impartially presented and rationally discussed; or
(b) a process by which media controllers push either their own political agenda or that of an invested party.

Anyway… Tory politicians being arseholes, the media dressing them up in sensational populism, and media consumers being bigoted bell ends? Plus ça change; I give it about 30 seconds until that state of affairs comes round again.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 10:56 am
Posts: 5171
Free Member
 

Or (c) a process in which a position is adopted which produces the best story.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 10:58 am
Posts: 2298
Free Member
 

It won't make any difference, It's just Shapps scrabbling for something that makes him look popular.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 11:27 am
Posts: 15461
Full Member
 

It's OK they're just in electioneering mode focused on the miserable fraction of the population that currently control their destiny's. Its merely a demonstration of aligned hatred, gesture politics "look we hate the same outlier groups that you do" (at least the ones they can still openly admit to)...

Considering the thread we had the other day an easy counterpoint to put to Grant would be; when will the government tackle phone use by drivers? Mobile use behind the wheel probably claims more lives and causes more injuries than bicycles ridden into Peds (?) and detection rates (anecdotally) are abysmal.

If transport safety is genuinely something they care about, there's some substantially bigger issues for them to tackle IMO, except of course my opinion isn't the one that matters currently...


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 11:33 am
Posts: 58
Free Member
 

Laura Laker wrote a well-researched article for The Guardian in 2018. It includes:

"Simply put, a 1,000kg car moving at 22mph will have 50kJ of energy; a 15kg bike with a 70kg rider at the same speed has less than one-tenth of that. Commuter cyclists tend to ride a lot slower, though, while most drivers travel faster. The likelihood of killing someone is far greater when driving a car than riding a bike."

Linky (may include a request for donation): Killer cyclists? Let’s not forget the real threat on our roads

I have checked the figures; they seem right to me.
Even if the cyclist was nailing it at 30mph, a 1000kg car at 22mph would still have seven times the energy. A 38 ton lorry at 22mph would have over two hundred.
1000kg is very light for a car these days. VW golfs are 1200 to 1600. Kia e-Niro is 1800 kg.

Harrison Jones wrote an article for the Guardian in 2018. It includes:

"In 2015, two pedestrians were killed and 96 seriously injured after being hit by bicycles. According to the Daily Telegraph, three pedestrians were killed by cyclists in 2016, with its statistics suggesting such collisions were increasing.

More than 100 cyclists are killed and 3,000 seriously injured on British roads each year, according to government statistics."

Linky (may include a request for donation): Death by dangerous cycling offence to be introduced – reports


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 11:44 am
Posts: 5839
Full Member
 

And yet, killing a cyclist while over the speed limit, on your phone, uninsured and stoned out of your tree only gets you 21 months.

Which will equate to 10.5 months lock up, still at least they hit him with a long driving ban before he’s allowed on the road.(not)

But still them hordes of death delivering cyclists hurtling around dispatching innocent pedestrians like ‘just eat’ for Death.

Does do my head in this shite attempted to be served up.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 11:49 am
Posts: 5839
Full Member
 

Ah I forgot to do my usual fun fact statistic that I like to do when we get into the threat of death by cyclist for perspective.

In 2021 there were 633 deaths due to choking not sure of the deaths caused by cyclist that year but your more likely to die due to that hobnob that you didn’t dunk enough at breakfast than by a furious cyclist.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 12:05 pm
Posts: 15461
Full Member
 

But still them hordes of death delivering cyclists hurtling around dispatching innocent pedestrians like ‘just eat’ for Death.

Funny you should mention just eat, I reckon the most likely cause of 2 wheeled death round our way are the deliverooist on Heath Robinson "e-bikes"; a Chinese hub motor, all the laptop batteries you can possibly gaffa tape to a pannier and a thumb throttle, they do not pedal but they can easily top 30 uphill (in our 20 limit area).
Essentially it's the old unregistered/regulated motorbike thing again, except they're delivering vital transfats to suburbia so the rozzers ignore them, that and privately owned e-scooters are increasingly all over the place...

Its probably not bicycle collision with Peds that they need to worry about, the number of twist'n'go electrically propelled dickheads is definitely on the increase. And they've really not bothered to enforce/police the crap rules they put in place there either...


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 12:07 pm
Posts: 7126
Full Member
 

It's things like this make me wonder about emigrating to the Denmark or the Netherlands and taking my income tax payments with me.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 12:28 pm
Posts: 2367
Free Member
 

It's fine. I'll just claim the sun was in my eyes, the pedestrian didn't pay tax or have a number plate and looked a bit foreign and the jury will let me off and probably buy me lunch.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 1:32 pm
Posts: 4004
Free Member
 

Red meat to appease their voter base. Nothing of substance to see here.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 3:20 pm
Posts: 33213
Full Member
 

So yup, a terrible government delivering terrible policies to pander to the terrible misinformed prejudices of the most terrible people in the country in a desperate bid to distract from the fact they have no idea how to solve any actual problems facing us.

That needs copying and pasting to all the political threads


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 3:21 pm
Posts: 1259
Free Member
 

Don't rise to the bait - agree with cyclists having equal consequences to drivers, and that's one less item for the bike bingo card.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 6:11 pm
Posts: 66118
Full Member
 

Government by bear baiting, hurrah.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 6:12 pm
Posts: 9621
Full Member
 

The elderly couple on our road asked me to pop into ASDA (a shop I don't like) and purchase a DM for them. On seeing the huge front page rant about cyclists going around murdering pedestrians, I was raging all the way back home.

A few of my relations detest people who cycle, this kind of written rubbish just fuels their fire and I'm nearer to having a heart attack.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 9:02 pm
Posts: 730
Free Member
 

The elderly couple on our road asked me to pop into ASDA (a shop I don’t like) and purchase a DM for them. On seeing the huge front page rant about cyclists going around murdering pedestrians, I was raging all the way back home.

A few of my relations detest people who cycle, this kind of written rubbish just fuels their fire and I’m nearer to having a heart attack.

It's hate speech and vitriol and really really needs to stop. When the great unwashed constantly read it they believe and emotionally attach to it


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 10:32 pm
Posts: 1736
Full Member
 

The elderly couple on our road asked me to pop into ASDA (a shop I don’t like) and purchase a DM for them.

I was asked to do that once, I had to stuff it into another paper to hide it in case anyone saw.


 
Posted : 06/08/2022 10:54 pm
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

Don’t rise to the bait – agree with cyclists having equal consequences to drivers, and that’s one less item for the bike bingo card.

Yeah, that was my thinking, too. The quaint old 'cycling furiously' thing is stupid and in need of updating.

Shapps is a moron but this seems like a sensible change wrapped up in some populist anti-cycling propaganda that most of his gammon fans will lap up today and forget about tomorrow.


 
Posted : 07/08/2022 12:59 am
Posts: 12378
Full Member
 

Obviously this is mostly just a bit of red meat to throw to conservative voters. However, there are plenty of spectacularly stupid cyclists who really do deserve to be prosecuted and e-bikes/electric motorbikes will only make that worse. I'm glad this guy wasn't killed, but he really does deserve to be prosecuted for his stupidity.

https://twitter.com/Instantregretes/status/1556149178593865728


 
Posted : 07/08/2022 9:15 am
Posts: 5300
Full Member
 

... agree with cyclists having equal consequences to drivers, and that’s one less item for the bike bingo card.

It's not the same at all though. All the legislation around driving exists because it's an inherently dangerous activity requiring the highest of standards to prevent many thousands of deaths. The same does not apply to riding a bike.

The narrative that drivers and cyclists should be treated equally doesn't make any practical sense. It only exists as a means to vilify a group of people. Supporting that narrative by accepting it, is detrimental in itself.


 
Posted : 07/08/2022 9:25 am
Posts: 9621
Full Member
 

After delivering the DM to the elderly neighbours (both know I cycle a lot), I made sure that they knew this was badly written. Journalism at its worst. They shyly said they only want the weekend edition because it contains The telly guide.


 
Posted : 07/08/2022 9:32 am
Posts: 5054
Free Member
 

“Simply put, a 1,000kg car moving at 22mph will have 50kJ of energy; a 15kg bike with a 70kg rider at the same speed has less than one-tenth of that. Commuter cyclists tend to ride a lot slower, though, while most drivers travel faster. The likelihood of killing someone is far greater when driving a car than riding a bike.”

Except most vehicles (including passengers etc) weigh far more than 1000kg.

And cows, we need to ban cows as they kill upwards of 5x the number of people cyclists do.


 
Posted : 07/08/2022 9:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This will give the Karens down the local woods another thing to screech at anyone daring to ride a bike there.

The same Karens that let their mutts run around of the lead shitting everywhere.

Tories appealing to intolerant arseholes. What’s new?


 
Posted : 07/08/2022 10:05 pm
Posts: 33213
Full Member
 

It’s hate speech and vitriol and really really needs to stop

I did a Teams presentation at work describing the abuse, threats and actual assaults I'd encountered while going about my normal daily activities and asked people what they thought it was for - they assumed it was racist or homophones. They were surprised it was because I was on a bike.

NB - in no way trying to claim that what we go through is on a par with racism and homophobia


 
Posted : 07/08/2022 10:13 pm
Posts: 6642
Full Member
 

I stopped bike commuting after 15years of the same route as i figured this government had failed to provide me with a safe environment to do so. The spite/bile and them Vs us culture war wore me down. The Facebook/Daily Mail cycle hate comments represent the average Brit I encountered daily.

I now sit in the same traffic I used to cycle past in an old polluting 2.0litre diesel and give a virtual shrug of the shoulders.


 
Posted : 07/08/2022 11:08 pm
Posts: 9621
Full Member
 

Reading about the 'new' highway code rules to help cyclists and pedestrians on face book is showing the worse of human nature
The hatred and vitriol spouted against people who cycle is astonishing.

Many years ago I used to cycle commute to work and the abuse I got from car drivers was outrageous, with threats on my life. I'm a small woman who weighs nothing. These were always from men and always when I wanted to turn right. Happy to work from home now.

I've always said that for 'one' day only, all cyclists should get off their bikes and drive, the roads would be solidly jammed.


 
Posted : 08/08/2022 10:17 am
Posts: 5054
Free Member
 

Many years ago I used to cycle commute to work and the abuse I got from car drivers was outrageous, with threats on my life. I’m a small woman who weighs nothing. These were always from men and always when I wanted to turn right. Happy to work from home now.

TBH I got the same for a couple of decades commuting in/around London, but I was a on a 1000cc motorbike - and 6'2" in bare feet, never mind full leathers and a crash helmet.

Tin tops just hate the ability of 2-wheelers to not get stuck in the same queues as them, don't take it 'personally'.


 
Posted : 08/08/2022 10:26 am
Page 1 / 3