Forum menu
CX vs 29er - what&#...
 

[Closed] CX vs 29er - what's the difference?

Posts: 7
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2806121]

Obviously flat vs drop bars and the op to have suspension, F and/or R but in essence, they both have big wheels and that's how they differ from yr standard mountain bike.

So for smooth-ish woodsy trails, is there really that much difference given a lot of people seem to be riding 29ers rigid?


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 953
Free Member
 

Well one's a cyclocross bike, the other's a mountain bike.....


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Geometry....like the difference between a dh bike and fs cross country bike.


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 12528
Full Member
 

they're both not monstercross, but for different reasons.


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 1:17 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12482
Full Member
 

I guess geometry and frame construction will also differ, I get overlap on my CX and never do on my MTB (26 not 29 though)


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

/\ Brilliant Ned.
Also they are very different types of fun ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 1:18 pm
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

The only difference between 29ers and 26ers is their wheel size. Rather than drop bars, geometry, skinnier tyres. Or can you not get beyond those outrageous wheels?


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 1:24 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

intended usage?


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 1:26 pm
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

There are exceptions to both your initial assumptions. Fundamentally I would say it's easier to say the only similarity is one of rim diameter, and that's pretty much where it ends.


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 2:08 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

What Sam says.


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 2:09 pm
Posts: 10978
Free Member
 

rim diameter

๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 31/05/2011 2:23 pm