Forum menu
Cranked Magazine
 

[Closed] Cranked Magazine

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jumping is a basic skill. I never mentioned pro level riders just basic bike handling skills.

The way you’ve extrapolated my point to Sam Hill and Loic Bruni is laughable – well it made me laugh!

That use of the possessive apostrophe is very clunky even if it is technically correct – 4/10 must try harder.

Well, using the possessive with gerunds features in the writing of almost all of the great writers of the Twentieth Century. But, then, what do they know, in comparison with your towering intellect?

Have you not flounced yet? Or is this an encore?

JP


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 10:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I’ve just bought my first issue, no 15. I like it and might buy it again, but it won’t replace my singletrack sub.


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 10:40 pm
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

Two different mags. I've never bothered with ST but I'm not the target market. Likewise Shredder, totally different again but similar ethos to Cranked, shows there is plenty of room in the world for quality print though.


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 10:44 pm
Posts: 13282
Free Member
 

https://flic.kr/p/R49Ux6


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shredder's good too. So was Sender but it's dead now.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 9:52 am
 biff
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I like Cranked.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 10:09 am
Posts: 5195
Full Member
 

It's quite a lot for 4 magazines, are they jammed full of content? (i.e. same as 12 mags but in 4)


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 10:34 am
 qtip
Posts: 900
Free Member
 

It is quite a lot for 4 magazines, but they are high quality print magazines. A lot of the content is photography, but it's great photography that inspires me to ride. The rest of the content is generally well written articles that appeal to a broad range of riders. I think an appreciation of all aspects of mountain biking is required to really get your money's worth from the magazine. The fairly minimal amount of advertising is refreshing, and the lack of bike reviews means that the articles stay current and you can go back to them months/years later and the majority are just as applicable as when they were written.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 10:42 am
Posts: 6316
Full Member
 

Does anyone actually read bike mags for the reviews anyway?
It's so subjective, that all you need to really know is if it fell apart during normal use!

I like ST for the nice photos and pieces like the courier bag article in the last issue.

The only reason I had an MBUK sub for a while was the free buffs and socks 😋


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 10:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It’s quite a lot for 4 magazines, are they jammed full of content? (i.e. same as 12 mags but in 4)

You won’t get 12 mags (worth reading) for £40 😀

But also:

- around 30,000 words in each issue. That’s half a short book
- minimum of 110 editorial pages per issue
- max 15% of pages given over to ads

The cover price is more than other mags but we’re aware we have to provide good value.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 11:50 am
Posts: 2135
Full Member
 

The 2 magazines I subscribe to are both expensive but well worth in terms of content. Sidetracked and Cranked. Who needs monthly mags full of the same stuff. I'm very happy with printed quarterlies with great photography and stories.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 12:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Eddiebaby - that’s a magnificent flounce. With memes that good I’ll probably hang around - they’ve got my £35 for the year anyway...

Backed to Cranked etc. The thing I like most about STW is the photography - the last two premier edition covers have been amazing. Sounds like Cranked take photography seriously too.

I’m definitely going to pop to WH Smith’s in the Arndale to grab a copy.

I think bike reviews are for places like YouTube not printed magazines. Videos are a much better way of judging a review in context IMO.

Guy Kesteven’s YouTube is brilliant - sounds like he’s left the world of print behind.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 12:23 pm
Posts: 3312
Free Member
 

Meaningless theatrical flounce.

Again.

Its like those people who post on facebook / insta / twitter etc to tell everyone that they are no longer going to be posting on facebook / insta / twitter etc.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 1:18 pm
Posts: 12524
Full Member
 

biff

I like Cranked.

I would hope you do!


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 1:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The mag (ST) has almost zero interesting content now, so just isn't worth buying. A real shame, as I used to enjoy it.

Did I read circulation was ~6000. Amazed it has continued as long as it has.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 1:48 pm
 Alex
Posts: 7681
Full Member
 

I subscribe to both. I write a column for Cranked and that's the only article I don't read! Like the depth, presentation and photography in Cranked. Always end up reading it all, whereas I tend to browse ST.

They are very different publications IMO. If you've not read cranked, give it a go, it's about the cost of a pint and a bag of crisps if you're in London!


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 2:39 pm
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

As I said on the thread on the story itself, the notion of a journalist’s having to be a pro level rider to justify being allowed to review a bike is laughable.

I do miss Marcel Wurst's bike reviews in Pro Cycling mag...


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 4:57 pm
Posts: 61
Free Member
 

Cranked is truly great. Get a copy and absorb the quality, you won't regret it!


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 6:52 pm
Page 2 / 2