Forum menu
Cotic Soul - 2005 f...
 

[Closed] Cotic Soul - 2005 frame fork travel?

Posts: 5
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3609584]

I just bought a 2005 model Soul and am going to get some new forks for it. Looking at Reba and was wondering if it can take 120mm? I know the newer ones can take more than that but pretty sure the older frames were limited to either 100mm or 120mm.

Thanks


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:12 am
Posts: 10743
Full Member
 

Nah, it's always been fine for 130.

I have a Mk 1 Soul and run it with Magura Menja 130, which is perfect for me.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:16 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

130mm max.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:17 am
Posts: 8199
Full Member
 

New ones are 140mm, older ones 130mm as above.

I've got 120mm rebas on my soul, its great with them :lol:.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:19 am
Posts: 10743
Full Member
 

I've just dug out an email from Cy where he recommended a Marzocchi 100 fork over a RS 100 fork for a Mk1 because "they're longer for the travel".

I'm just about to take said frame to the powdercoaters, and spent a few pleasant minutes chatting to Paul at Cotic yesterday, while ordering stickers, as he too rides a Mk1, and they use that in the design tests as a benchmark for any "improvements". He's always happy to go back to that one, as am I.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:23 am
Posts: 5
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thats brilliant, many thanks for the feedback.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 12:24 pm
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

I've just dug out an email from Cy where he recommended a Marzocchi 100 fork over a RS 100 fork for a Mk1 because "they're longer for the travel".

Cy also used to say on the Cotic website that he advised against the Marzocchi Z1 FR on the grounds that the a/c measurement was [u]too[/u] long for the travel. In fact, he used to advise against bolt-through forks in general.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 1:54 pm
Posts: 10743
Full Member
 

I was asking specifically about a 100mm fork. And if I recall, the issue with longer forks and watrranties has been about the too stiff long forks being able to overload the frame, not about the geometry.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 3:30 pm
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

the issue with longer forks and watrranties has been about the [b]too stiff long forks being able to overload the frame[/b], not about the geometry

The geometry was a factor, as in "long for the travel", but it's also a bit crap when you're relying on an assumed level of flex in someone else's component to take some of the loading off yours.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 10:50 pm