Forum menu
BFe or Alpine?
 

[Closed] BFe or Alpine?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1150522]

Anyone had/ridden both?

Currently got a BFe loaner from Cotic which i really rate but i also fancy the DB Alpine, is there much between them?

ta


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, what you gonna be using them for?


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

iv had a shot on the bfe and its really good fun, the evil is pretty cool too. havnt had a shot on a db alpine but the evil is a very similar bike. its a bit more do or die me thinks. http://www.evil-bikes.com/#/undefined/news_event/000000022/Sovereigns


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

riding around


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:32 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

riding around

456 or isnt it 'boutique' enough? 😉


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Probably better off with something cheaper or more xc based then, maybe an 'off the peg' specialized or similar?

But seriously, if your doing more dh type stuff Id say Alpine or if you want it for some jumps or a bit more xc then Id say BFe


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

it will be used for anything and everything and i've got a 456 summer which i don't like and i've had a normal 456.

Looking for something in 853, nothing to do with boutique but i'm looking for quality.


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:43 pm
 Rex
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

isn't the bfe dropping the 853 for next year?

i found the alpine had quite a tall bb...but that's probably an issue for most long-forked hardtails.

why didn't you get on with the summer 456?


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:47 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

i have an alpine i use for all day XC as well as all mountain epics and think its great.

i haven't had a chance to try a BFe though.


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hello daughter has/for sale a mk2 alpine, used it for riding everywhere and thought it was pretty sorted, with 140mm thors on she thought it was better than her coves or santa cruz chamelon, very direct she descibed it as being,


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I reckon the Alpine will be more similar to the SS than the BFe would be.

I had an Alpine, it was class for DH and ok for xc stuff but a bit short for me. Only downer was the highish BB, also the stays were quite long so nice and stable but not as much fun as my old dmr for larking about on.

The BFe feels a bit more nimble but the back end feels a fair bit stiffer, the Alpine was comfier. the BFe is maybe a touch steeper but hard to tell, the bb is noticeably lower and I like the shorter stays. Maybe not as solid on the downhills though but a bit better for jumps n that.

Dont know what else to add, that was dull. The Alpines paint job is more solid than the Cotics though


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thanks all, i'm thinking the BFe would be better (which is good, i don't think Cy would speak to me again if i gave him his bike back and then bought an Alpine!)

As for the SS i think it's too heavy and too slack, both of which i could live with but the problem is it ain't got no soul. (imho of course).


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just to warn you, I don't think that a BFe or Alpine will be anly lighter than a SS for the same size.


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeh it will


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:03 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hicksville surely it should be 50% of retail? 😕


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well this review says frame weight 5.4lbs: http://www.bikemagic.com/gear-news/on-one-456-summer-season/6366.html - although it doesn't say what size.

Compare that to 5.4lbs for a 16" BFe or ~5.5lbs for a DB Alpine.

Of course, I haven't actually weighed them myself.


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeh maybe your right, I always thought the SS was over 6lbs in weight


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

the BFe is considerably lighter than the SS and i assume the alpine will be too.


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hora sorry what a few weeks old mk2 alpine for 50% retail......sorry 🙄 Hora you must be thinking it is christmas.............or are you auditioning for morecambe and wise special????? 😉


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ah ok, you're saying that the completed bike build is lighter? Yah?


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I always thought that was generally what people went by, %50 of the RRP, minus %10 for each year old or something like that.

Thing is, if your buying 2nd hand you get no warrenty, so maybe most people would prefer to spend the extra £60 or whatever and get a warrenty? **** knows, seems daft selling a frame for £180 if you've only used it for a couple of weeks though


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ah needs must for travelling,...............she can extend her volunteering opportunity and then travel after so needs the cash


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 3:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just bought a BFe


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 4:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.bikemagic.com/gear-news/on-one-456-summer-season/6366.html ]On One SS[/url]
On One Summer 5.4 lbs

[url= http://www.dialledbikes.com/products/mtb/alpine.php ]DB Alpine[/url]
Alpine around 5.5 lbs

[url= http://www.cotic.co.uk/product/BFe ]Cotic Bfe[/url]
Bfe 5.4 lbs

Err, all the same weight I'm afraid, nowt wrong with wanting something that turns you on more though..


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 4:46 pm
Posts: 8857
Full Member
 

£125 for an SS? No brainer to me and I'm a die hard Alpine fan.

Oh, but Alpine's are nice and short for / like me, On-ones are lanky.


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 5:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup, my 456 SS is a bit longer than I'd like and the slacker head angle just makes it longer still, in the wheelbase.


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm suprised at that jobbyheid, i've gone for a Mk1 which is lighter than the current model but there can't be much in it.

When i strip the SS down i'll weight both frames.

I think you'd be daft to argue the SS isn't excellent vfm but i just found it too agricultural for me, i suppose you get what you pay for?


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 6:09 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Agree on On-ones being lanky. I'm trying a 16" next.


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

mines just on up on the classifieds!


 
Posted : 22/12/2009 6:19 pm