Forum menu
best non-padded box...
 

[Closed] best non-padded boxers for riding?

Posts: 1507
Free Member
Topic starter
 

nights drawing in, time to start utilising the lunch hours and make it up in the evening... need some boxers i can ride in but also wear under my trousers all morning for speedy superman carpark kit changes. hate sitting there in pads!!

i hear Saxx are meant to be good, and also Under Armour?


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 7:33 am
Posts: 1507
Free Member
Topic starter
 

baw bags


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 8:36 am
Posts: 91161
Free Member
 

They have to be boxers?

There are loads of underwear options from the people that make base layers and such. I have a great pair from REI, but they aren't boxers, they are briefs.


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 8:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Under Amour BoxerJock are awesome


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 9:03 am
Posts: 5195
Full Member
 

I haven't worn anything padded under my shorts for any form of MTB for ages now

For anything up to a day I'll generally just wear normal boxers

For anything over a day (bikepacking etc) I'll usually wear synthetic boxers that dry quicker than normal cotton boxers. My trips aren't longer than 3 days

I've been considering some merino boxers but figured they'd take ages to dry if they got wet in the rain

I wear lycra for riding on the road (commuting basically)


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 10:41 am
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

Was looking in decathlons website for this just yesterday they seem to have some good offers.

I usually just use normal boxers. Can't stand padded shorts unless on a really long road ride and even then don't like them.


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 10:43 am
Posts: 628
Free Member
 

Saxx are good, nifty little mesh thing to keep everything in place. Arcteryx merino ones also good, particularly so because they have some funky seam stitching. Spendy though.

https://www.snowandrock.com/p/arc-teryx-men-s-satoro-ar-boxers-A1944241.html?colour=103


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 10:54 am
Posts: 17388
Full Member
 

Anything that doesn't have a seam to chafe on long rides. Usually something in M&S


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 10:58 am
 a11y
Posts: 3931
Full Member
 

+1 on Under Armour BoxerJocks. Fairly synthetic/quick-drying. Various lengths available, think I went for medium leg length figuring that'd be more than long enough...


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 10:59 am
 mos
Posts: 1588
Full Member
 

This thread has confused me.
Cycling = cycling shorts but no boxers.
Not cycling = boxers but no cycling shorts.


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 11:03 am
Posts: 1507
Free Member
Topic starter
 

yeah, but dont need padded cycling shorts for an hour or so blast. just need good fitting, wicking boxers... im talking about wearing them under baggies btw


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 11:21 am
Posts: 1507
Free Member
Topic starter
 

2 pairs of the UA boxerjocks are on their way to me. Saxx just too expensive for an experiment... baw bags maybe next time.


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 11:26 am
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

Worn some of [url= https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00ARQUQGA/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o07_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 ]These[/url] for walking and some minor cycling forays. No seam, stretchy, long, cool, no chafing, no bunching up, hold up well. Wish had discovered years ago! Highly recommended.

*edit oops late to the boxers party


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 11:31 am
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

This thread has confused me.
Cycling = cycling shorts but no boxers.
Not cycling = boxers but no cycling shorts.

It can't be that hard to understand that not everyone wants to ware padded shorts for all rides, especially shorter rides of just a couple of hours.

I personally don't find padded shorts add any comfort unless out all day, > 5 hr.


 
Posted : 12/09/2017 11:58 am