Forum menu
Atherton's on ...
 

[Closed] Atherton's on GT...

 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No just looks substantial I.e heavier than it actually is


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 10:14 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

elliott-20 - Member

It won't win any awards on the looks front but that's not what's its about is it.

hora - Member

Imagine browsing through the cycle forums and coming across your looks rather than your ability being discussed negatively.


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 10:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sister=like
Bike=don't like


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 10:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

well yes i would of thought that is clear seen as how it's not me you are referring to.

it maters not anyway i asked you if there is any need for that sort of stuff but it would seem that you do need that sort of stuff so best of luck with it.

Stop being so soft, I was just speaking my mind!


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sanction 1.0 is likely to be the obvious choice of bike for the enduro events, very interested to see how Dan gets on with these style of races. Personally think he will do very well judging by the few he attempted at the tail end of last year.


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 10:58 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

like i said dude best of luck with yer mind.
anyway why do you care what i think stop being so soft.


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 11:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mustard - Will they be in Fox kit? - No longer with Animal, Beaumont is/was sponsored by them last year and the head on his shirt is the only clear logo in those shots - am i reading too much into it? Does anyone really care?

Yes you are reading too much into it and no one cares but the One Industries branding on Gee's and Rachel's shirts isn't exactly subtle!


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 11:45 pm
Posts: 7365
Free Member
 

So who's going to be on Commencal next season then?


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 11:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

anyway why do you care what i think

I don't


 
Posted : 10/01/2012 11:59 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 11/01/2012 12:00 am
Posts: 34531
Full Member
 

live from atherton HQ in california

gees new build...........

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 12:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GOPPING.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:03 am
Posts: 5387
Free Member
 

i prefer it in white - but it may be the (almost) white background thats camouflaging the rest of it....

i've never really like the i-drive, good concept back in the 90's but seems out dated now.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 8:25 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Well it's not my cup of tea either, but I'm sure they wouldn't have taken the deal if Gee didn't think he could go fast enough to win on it.

Someone needs to tell him you can get lower profile pedals than DXs now though.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 10:43 am
Posts: 9238
Free Member
 

Who knows. It seems like fast riders can go fast on most things (within reason) so maybe this was just GT throwing enough money at them to make them switch.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 11:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bleurgh!
They've rolled that turd in glitter haven't they?
He'll still be fast as **** though.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

it's not a good looking bike is it. lets hops it works well to make up for the looks.....


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They've rolled that turd in glitter haven't they?

Took the words right out of my mouth. You would have to pay me to ride it.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:25 pm
Posts: 2811
Full Member
 

is idrive still going? it was shit in the 90's, is it still shit now?


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:29 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

Someone needs to tell him you can get lower profile pedals than DXs now though.

Gee has used Crank Brothers Mallets for the last few seasons (not sure how long tbh).

I actually quite like it. However, all the reviews I've read of the Fury haven't been particularly complimentary. Having said that, I remember an article where a journo took Fairclough's bike for a spin and couldn't get on with it at all. I believe the issue was that the suspension was set up so firm that you had to ride at WC race pace to make it work.

I have a feeling Gee and Rachel will make it work somehow ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What's so bad about the idrive suspension?


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:41 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

What's so bad about the idrive suspension?

From what I've read it's not supposed to be the plushest of suspension designs. Yes, they pedal very well, but small bump compliance isn't supposed to be that good.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm sure that the geometry of the GT will be different to off the peg for the Atherton's, just as the Comm's were for them. The old Comm's were degrees slacker to be fair. Then they get custom tune suspension and black box???

Reviews of standard bikes don't mean that much when we're talking factory editions, do they? Bet their's will fly! Good luck to them, seems like they need it, especially Gee. Think Rach' will be on form this year though, save injury.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I looked at an idrive GT Force when I was looking for an FS. It was a toss up between that and the Pace 405 which got great reviews for its Freefloater suspension.


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:59 pm
Posts: 34531
Full Member
 

wow theres a lot of armchair dh pros on here!
im sure he'll have a good enough team to get the suspension to tune out what he doesnt like

as for the pedals, i reckon there only on there because the athertons are sponsored by the bigS and this is a sponsors pic

but most of the clipped in WC dhers ride mallets, whoever theyre sponsored by


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 1:59 pm
Posts: 6680
Free Member
 

but most of the clipped in WC dhers ride mallets, whoever theyre sponsored by

must cost crank brothers a fortune having to supply them with a new set after every race ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 2:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

think Tracey mosley is better looking ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 2:30 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

That'd be the best looking Fury ever, I reckon, if it weren't for the forks. White, white, white, tart's handbag, white.

robsoctane - Member

Then they get <snip> black box???

Not on Shimano and Fox they don't!


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 2:33 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

It's not pretty, but it does look pretty purposeful!


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 3:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

robsoctane - Member
Then they get <snip> black box???

Not on Shimano and Fox they don't!

Thanks for that - good point!

kimbers - Member
wow theres a lot of armchair dh pros on here!

That's probably because lots of us like to watch the races, read the hype and even form opinions! I'm not always right though, see just above. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 15/01/2012 3:39 pm
Posts: 1050
Full Member
 

think Tracey mosley is better looking

Is it only me or is anyone else always disappointed by the pics of Tracey in magazines - always from a funny angle and not quite showing her off - she is a lovely looking, red hot international athlete - but the pics never show it!!!

๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 16/01/2012 10:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have one of Marc Beaumont's old Furys, it came with off-set bushes and an angle set, so is slacked out to about 62 degrees; it's a lot better looking in my living room than any of those pictures look on my computer screen. It's very light too, my build is around the 37lbs mark, with mostly heavy components on it.

It's obviously a fast bike, regardless of what some reviews have said, Marc won a World Cup round on it and Mick Hannah hasn't exactly been slow on it either.


 
Posted : 16/01/2012 10:44 am
Page 2 / 2