Forum menu
That just made choosing between the Aeris 120 ad 145 difficult, I can't imagine that the weights will be much different.
There will be a weight difference due to the 145 handling a 160mm fork - but the bigger difference is geometry, with the 145 being 2 degrees slacker with a 160mm fork, and the feel of the extra travel.
Hmm, adjustable travel on the 29" then 110-130 please! 😆
2 models 20mm travel apart would work, just like the 650b options. And having specced it for them I think we can ask for a discount. 🙂
Then I wouldn't be able to choose!
Unless one were made from CF...
Yeah another vote for a 29" bike, I would love to support Bird. I'm currently on a xl nukeproof scout 290 with a 66 degree head angle.
Hmm, was looking at getting an Aeris 1.5 for the Mrs before Xmas...
whats the hole below the rear shock for?
What we need is a Zero TR 29, I need a winter bike now but I'm really enjoying the bigger wheels at the minute!
Old one looks nicer.
Guess the 2.5kg is plus shock?
What we need is a Zero TR 29,
That's what my money is on for their first big-wheel frame.
Definitely a shortage of 29er HT frames with sorted geometry.
whats the hole below the rear shock for?
I think you mean the brace that's joining the seatstays? Stiffer than just having separate stays meeting either side of the link that drives the shock.